Literature DB >> 29415287

Residual adenoma after cold snare polypectomy for small colorectal adenomas: a prospective clinical study.

Daisuke Maruoka1,2, Makoto Arai1,3, Naoki Akizue1,3, Kentaro Ishikawa1, Shingo Kasamatsu1, Takashi Taida1, Hideaki Ishigami1, Kenichiro Okimoto1,3, Keiko Saito1, Tomoaki Matsumura1, Tomoo Nakagawa1, Tatsuro Katsuno1, Naoya Kato1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic resection of all colonic adenomas prevents the occurrence of colon cancer and death. The European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Clinical Guideline recommends resection of all polyps predicted to be adenomas and cold snare polypectomy (CSP) for removal of adenomas ≤ 9 mm on the basis of safety; however, it also states that this recommendation lacks adequate evidence of efficacy. The residual adenoma rate after resection is an important indicator of efficacy, but there have been no reports showing this prospectively. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the residual adenoma rate after CSP of small colonic polyps.
METHODS: Between March 2015 and April 2017, patients who were endoscopically diagnosed with colorectal adenomas < 9 mm underwent CSP, the site being marked with endoscopic clips. Patients with pathologically confirmed adenomas underwent follow-up colonoscopy 3 weeks after CSP and any post-CSP scars were biopsied. The primary endpoint was the presence of pathological residual adenoma 3 weeks after CSP.
RESULTS: Overall, 126 lesions in 39 patients were removed and 125 (99.2 %) were resected en bloc using CSP. Pathologically, 111 lesions (88.1 %) were confirmed as adenomas (4.2 ± 1.5 mm), with 36 of these (32.4 %) determined to be R0 resections. No complications were observed. All 37 patients with pathologically confirmed adenomas underwent follow-up colonoscopy, and 102 of 111 scars were detected in 33 patients. One pathological residual adenoma (0.98 %, 95 % confidence interval 0.02 % - 5.3 %) was identified.
CONCLUSIONS: CSP appears to be an effective treatment for diminutive and small colorectal adenomas, with a low residual adenoma rate. © Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29415287     DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-124869

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Endoscopy        ISSN: 0013-726X            Impact factor:   10.093


  8 in total

1.  Usefulness of cold polypectomy under linked color imaging.

Authors:  Takuto Suzuki; Yoshiyasu Kitagawa; Rino Nankinzan; Taketo Yamaguchi
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2020-01-08

2.  Dye-based chromoendoscopy following polypectomy reduces incomplete polyp resection.

Authors:  Neil R O'Morain; Mohd I Syafiq; Ammar Shahin; Barbara Ryan; Stephen Crowther; Deirdre McNamara
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2020-01-08

3.  Efficacy of specimen pasting after cold snare polypectomy for pathological evaluation of horizontal margins.

Authors:  Takuya Ikeda; Tetsuya Yoshizaki; Takaaki Eguchi; Hiroshi Kinugasa; Akihiko Okada
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2022-05-13

4.  Underwater endoscopic mucosal resection of adenomas and colorectal serrated lesions: a prospective clinical study.

Authors:  Pedro Bothrel Nogueira; Walton Albuquerque; Ricardo Castejon Nascimento; Bruna Santos Marianelli; Frederico Fonseca Campos; Rodrigo Albuquerque Carreiro; Renata Figueiredo Rocha; Roberto Motta Pereira; Vitor Nunes Arantes
Journal:  Ann Gastroenterol       Date:  2021-04-03

5.  Risk of delayed bleeding before and after implementation of cold snare polypectomy in a screening colonoscopy setting.

Authors:  Li-Chun Chang; Chia-Tung Shun; Wen-Feng Hsu; Chia-Hong Tu; Chieh-Chang Chen; Ming-Shiang Wu; Han-Mo Chiu
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2019-01-30

6.  Complications of cold versus hot snare polypectomy of 10-20 mm polyps: A retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Shara N Ket; Dileep Mangira; Allysia Ng; Douglas Tjandra; Ja H Koo; Richard La Nauze; Andrew Metz; Alan Moss; Gregor Brown
Journal:  JGH Open       Date:  2019-08-18

7.  Safety and efficacy of cold snare polypectomy for small colorectal polyps: A prospective randomized control trial and one-year follow-up study.

Authors:  Takahiro Ito; Keitaro Takahashi; Hiroki Tanabe; Keisuke Sato; Mitsuru Goto; Tomonobu Sato; Kazuyuki Tanaka; Tatsuya Utsumi; Akihiro Fujinaga; Toru Kawamoto; Nobuyuki Yanagawa; Kentaro Moriichi; Mikihiro Fujiya; Toshikatsu Okumura
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2021-06-11       Impact factor: 1.889

8.  Real-world local recurrence rate after cold polypectomy in colorectal polyps less than 10 mm using propensity score matching.

Authors:  Masashi Saito; Takeshi Yamamura; Masanao Nakamura; Keiko Maeda; Tsunaki Sawada; Eri Ishikawa; Yasuyuki Mizutani; Takuya Ishikawa; Naomi Kakushima; Kazuhiro Furukawa; Eizaburo Ohno; Hiroki Kawashima; Masatoshi Ishigami; Mitsuhiro Fujishiro
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2021-12-21       Impact factor: 5.742

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.