Anna Lowe1, Chris Littlewood2, Sionnadh McLean3. 1. Centre for Health and Social Care Research, Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield, S10-2BP, UK. Electronic address: a.lowe@shu.ac.uk. 2. Arthritis Research UK Primary Care Centre, Research Institute for Primary Care and Health Sciences and Keele Clinical Trials Unit, David Weatherall Building, Keele University, Staffordshire, ST5 5BG, UK. Electronic address: https://twitter.com/PhysioChris. 3. Centre for Health and Social Care Research, Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield, S10-2BP, UK. Electronic address: https://twitter.com/SionnadhMcLean.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Physical inactivity is a major public health issue and healthcare professionals are encouraged to promote physical activity during routine patient contacts in order to reduce non-communicable diseases and enhance individuals' quality of life. Little is known about physical activity promotion in physiotherapy practice in the UK. The aim of this study was to better understand physiotherapists' experience of physical activity promotion in clinical practice. DESIGN: A qualitative study was undertaken comprising 12 telephone interviews with participants using a quota sampling approach. The qualitative data was analysed using a thematic analysis approach and written up according to COREQ guidelines. FINDINGS: Four themes were identified (1) Current physiotherapy practice (2) Barriers to, and facilitators of physical activity promotion, (3) Exercise or physical activity? and (4) Functional restoration versus general wellbeing. CONCLUSIONS: Physiotherapists use routine clinical contacts to discuss physical activity. However, brief interventions are not consistently used and no common framework to guide physical activity promotion was identified. Approaches appear to be inconsistent and informal and focus largely on short-term restoration of function rather than health promotion. There is scope to improve practice in line with current guidance to maximise potential impact on inactivity.
OBJECTIVE: Physical inactivity is a major public health issue and healthcare professionals are encouraged to promote physical activity during routine patient contacts in order to reduce non-communicable diseases and enhance individuals' quality of life. Little is known about physical activity promotion in physiotherapy practice in the UK. The aim of this study was to better understand physiotherapists' experience of physical activity promotion in clinical practice. DESIGN: A qualitative study was undertaken comprising 12 telephone interviews with participants using a quota sampling approach. The qualitative data was analysed using a thematic analysis approach and written up according to COREQ guidelines. FINDINGS: Four themes were identified (1) Current physiotherapy practice (2) Barriers to, and facilitators of physical activity promotion, (3) Exercise or physical activity? and (4) Functional restoration versus general wellbeing. CONCLUSIONS: Physiotherapists use routine clinical contacts to discuss physical activity. However, brief interventions are not consistently used and no common framework to guide physical activity promotion was identified. Approaches appear to be inconsistent and informal and focus largely on short-term restoration of function rather than health promotion. There is scope to improve practice in line with current guidance to maximise potential impact on inactivity.
Authors: Benjamin E Smith; Fiona Moffatt; Paul Hendrick; Marcus Bateman; James Selfe; Michael Skovdal Rathleff; Toby O Smith; Phillipa Logan Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2019-06-03 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Kerry West; Kate Purcell; Abby Haynes; Jennifer Taylor; Leanne Hassett; Catherine Sherrington Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-03-14 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Caroline Aubry; Corina Nüesch; Oliver Fiebig; Thomas M Stoll; Markus Köhler; Alain Barth; Annegret Mündermann Journal: N Am Spine Soc J Date: 2021-10-26
Authors: Dane Vishnubala; Adil Iqbal; Katherine Marino; Steven Whatmough; Ruth Barker; David Salman; Peter Bazira; Gabrielle Finn; Andy Pringle; Camilla Nykjaer Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-09-23 Impact factor: 4.614