Literature DB >> 29413284

Brainstem Injury in Pediatric Patients With Posterior Fossa Tumors Treated With Proton Beam Therapy and Associated Dosimetric Factors.

Michelle S Gentile1, Beow Y Yeap2, Harald Paganetti1, Claire P Goebel1, Dillon E Gaudet1, Sara L Gallotto1, Elizabeth A Weyman1, Michael L Morgan1, Shannon M MacDonald1, Drosoula Giantsoudi1, Judith Adams1, Nancy J Tarbell1, Hanne Kooy1, Torunn I Yock3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Proton radiation therapy is commonly used in young children with brain tumors for its potential to reduce late effects. However, some proton series report higher rates of brainstem injury (0%-16%) than most photon series (2.2%-8.6%). We report the incidence of brainstem injury and a risk factor analysis in pediatric patients with posterior fossa primary tumors treated with proton radiation therapy at our institution. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The study included 216 consecutive patients treated between 2000 and 2015. Dosimetry was available for all but 4 patients. Grade 2 to 5 late brainstem toxicity was assessed by the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0.
RESULTS: The histologies include medulloblastoma (n=154, 71.3%), ependymoma (n=56, 25.9%), and atypical teratoid rhabdoid tumor (n=6, 2.8%). The median age at irradiation was 6.6 years (range, 0.5-23.1 years); median dose, 54 gray relative biological effectiveness (Gy RBE) (range, 46.8-59.4 Gy RBE); and median follow-up period, 4.2 years (range, 0.1-15.3 years) among 198 survivors. Of the patients, 83.3% received chemotherapy; 70.4% achieved gross total resection. The crude rate of injury was 2.3% in all patients, 1.9% in those with medulloblastoma, 3.6% in those with ependymoma, and 0% in those with atypical teratoid rhabdoid tumor. The 5-year cumulative incidence of injury was 2.0% (95% confidence interval, 0.7%-4.8%). The median brainstem dose (minimum dose received by 50% of brainstem) in the whole cohort was 53.6 Gy RBE (range, 16.5-56.8 Gy RBE); maximum point dose within the brainstem (Dmax), 55.2 Gy RBE (range, 48.4-60.5 Gy RBE); and mean dose, 50.4 Gy RBE (range, 21.1-56.7 Gy RBE). In the 5 patients with injury, the median minimum dose received by 50% of the brainstem was 54.6 Gy RBE (range, 50.2-55.1 Gy RBE); Dmax, 56.2 Gy RBE (range, 55.0-57.1 Gy RBE); mean dose, 51.3 Gy RBE (range, 45.4-54.4 Gy RBE); and median volume of the brainstem receiving ≥55 Gy RBE (V55), 27.4% (range, 0%-59.4%). Of the 5 patients with injury, 4 had a brainstem Dmax in the highest quartile (≥55.8 Gy RBE, P = .016) and a V55 in the highest tertile (>6.0%) of the cohort distribution (P = .047). Of the 5 patients with injury, 3 were aged >6 years (age range, 4.1-22.8 years), and 4 of 5 patients received chemotherapy and achieved gross total resection.
CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of injury in pediatric patients with posterior fossa tumors is consistent with previous reports in the photon setting. Our data suggest that when Dmax and V55 are kept <55.8 Gy RBE and ≤6.0%, respectively, the 5-year rate of radiation brainstem injury would be <2%.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29413284     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2017.11.026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  11 in total

Review 1.  Proton therapy for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Olsi Gjyshi; Zhongxing Liao
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-08-20       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 2.  Mechanisms and Review of Clinical Evidence of Variations in Relative Biological Effectiveness in Proton Therapy.

Authors:  Harald Paganetti
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2021-08-15       Impact factor: 8.013

3.  Quantifying the risk and dosimetric variables of symptomatic brainstem injury after proton beam radiation in pediatric brain tumors.

Authors:  Rituraj Upadhyay; Kaiping Liao; David R Grosshans; Susan L McGovern; Mary Frances McAleer; Wafik Zaky; Murali M Chintagumpala; Anita Mahajan; Debra Nana Yeboa; Arnold C Paulino
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2022-09-01       Impact factor: 13.029

4.  No question: Proton therapy is safe.

Authors:  Daniel J Indelicato
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2022-09-01       Impact factor: 13.029

Review 5.  Proton therapy for brain tumours in the area of evidence-based medicine.

Authors:  Damien C Weber; Pei S Lim; Sebastien Tran; Marc Walser; Alessandra Bolsi; Ulrike Kliebsch; Jürgen Beer; Barbara Bachtiary; Tony Lomax; Alessia Pica
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-05-20       Impact factor: 3.039

6.  Spatial Agreement of Brainstem Dose Distributions Depending on Biological Model in Proton Therapy for Pediatric Brain Tumors.

Authors:  Lars Fredrik Fjæra; Daniel J Indelicato; Kristian S Ytre-Hauge; Ludvig P Muren; Yasmin Lassen-Ramshad; Laura Toussaint; Olav Dahl; Camilla H Stokkevåg
Journal:  Adv Radiat Oncol       Date:  2020-08-28

7.  Radiation Necrosis with Proton Therapy in a Patient with Aarskog-Scott Syndrome and Medulloblastoma.

Authors:  Vidya Puthenpura; Nicholas J DeNunzio; Xue Zeng; Drosoula Giantsoudi; Mariam Aboian; David Ebb; Kristopher T Kahle; Torunn I Yock; Asher M Marks
Journal:  Int J Part Ther       Date:  2021-07-29

8.  High LET-Like Radiation Tracks at the Distal Side of Accelerated Proton Bragg Peak.

Authors:  Dakota Horendeck; Kade D Walsh; Hirokazu Hirakawa; Akira Fujimori; Hisashi Kitamura; Takamitsu A Kato
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-06-10       Impact factor: 6.244

Review 9.  Modern Radiotherapy for Pediatric Brain Tumors.

Authors:  Nicholas J DeNunzio; Torunn I Yock
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2020-06-11       Impact factor: 6.639

Review 10.  Laser Interstitial Thermal Therapy for Posterior Fossa Lesions: A Systematic Review and Analysis of Multi-Institutional Outcomes.

Authors:  Mohammadmahdi Sabahi; Stephen J Bordes; Edinson Najera; Alireza M Mohammadi; Gene H Barnett; Badih Adada; Hamid Borghei-Razavi
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-17       Impact factor: 6.639

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.