Literature DB >> 29413244

Long-Term Outcomes in Patients With New Permanent Pacemaker Implantation Following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.

Chekrallah Chamandi1, Marco Barbanti2, Antonio Munoz-Garcia3, Azeem Latib4, Luis Nombela-Franco5, Enrique Gutiérrez-Ibanez6, Gabriela Veiga-Fernandez7, Asim N Cheema8, Ignacio Cruz-Gonzalez9, Vicenç Serra10, Corrado Tamburino2, Antonio Mangieri4, Antonio Colombo4, Pilar Jiménez-Quevedo5, Jaime Elizaga6, Gerard Laughlin6, Dae-Hyun Lee7, Bruno Garcia Del Blanco10, Tania Rodriguez-Gabella1, Josep-Ramon Marsal10, Mélanie Côté1, François Philippon1, Josep Rodés-Cabau11.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to evaluate the long-term clinical impact of permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR).
BACKGROUND: Conduction disturbances leading to PPI are common following TAVR. However, no data exist regarding the impact of PPI on long-term outcomes post-TAVR.
METHODS: This was a multicenter study including a total of 1,629 patients without prior PPI undergoing TAVR (balloon- and self-expandable valves in 45% and 55% of patients, respectively). Follow-up clinical, echocardiographic, and pacing data were obtained at a median of 4 years (interquartile range: 3 to 5 years) post-TAVR.
RESULTS: PPI was required in 322 (19.8%) patients within 30 days post-TAVR (26.9% and 10.9% in patients receiving self- and balloon-expandable CoreValve and Edwards systems, respectively). Up to 86% of patients with PPI exhibited pacing >1% of the time during follow-up (>40% pacing in 51% of patients). There were no differences between patients with and without PPI in total mortality (48.5% vs. 42.9%; adjusted hazard ratio [HR]: 1.15; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.95 to 1.39; p = 0.15) and cardiovascular mortality (14.9% vs. 15.5%, adjusted HR: 0.93; 95% CI: 0.66 to 1.30; p = 0.66) at follow-up. However, patients with PPI had higher rates of rehospitalization due to heart failure (22.4% vs. 16.1%; adjusted HR: 1.42; 95% CI: 1.06 to 1.89; p = 0.019), and the combined endpoint of mortality or heart failure rehospitalization (59.6% vs. 51.9%; adjusted HR: 1.25; 95% CI: 1.05 to 1.48; p = 0.011). PPI was associated with lesser improvement in LVEF over time (p = 0.051 for changes in LVEF between groups), particularly in patients with reduced LVEF before TAVR (p = 0.005 for changes in LVEF between groups).
CONCLUSIONS: The need for PPI post-TAVR was frequent and associated with an increased risk of heart failure rehospitalization and lack of LVEF improvement, but not mortality, after a median follow-up of 4 years. Most patients with new PPI post-TAVR exhibited some degree of pacing activity at follow-up.
Copyright © 2018 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  aortic stenosis; left ventricular ejection fraction; pacemaker; transcatheter aortic valve replacement

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29413244     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2017.10.032

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Interv        ISSN: 1936-8798            Impact factor:   11.195


  23 in total

Review 1.  The Lotus Valve System: an In-depth Review of the Technology.

Authors:  Matthew E Seigerman; Ashwin Nathan; Saif Anwaruddin
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2019-11-25       Impact factor: 2.931

2.  Dependence on permanent pacemakers inserted after transcatheter aortic valve implantation: predictive factors in a ten-year retrospective analysis: Rates and predictors of pacemaker dependence after TAVI.

Authors:  Lance Ng; Rajesh Nair; Faeez Ali; Sanjeevan Pasupati
Journal:  AsiaIntervention       Date:  2021-12

3.  Mid- to Long-Term Clinical and Echocardiographic Effects of Post-procedural Permanent Pacemaker Implantation After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Shun Xu; Enrui Zhang; Zhiyong Qian; Jinyu Sun; Fengwei Zou; Yao Wang; Xiaofeng Hou; Jiangang Zou
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-06-28

Review 4.  Sex Differences in Molecular Mechanisms of Cardiovascular Aging.

Authors:  Vanessa Dela Justina; Jéssica S G Miguez; Fernanda Priviero; Jennifer C Sullivan; Fernanda R Giachini; R Clinton Webb
Journal:  Front Aging       Date:  2021-09-10

5.  Predictors of conduction recovery after permanent pacemaker implantation following transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

Authors:  Derek Q Phan; Jesse Goitia; Ming-Sum Lee; Nigel Gupta; Vicken Aharonian; Prakash Mansukhani; Naing Moore; Somjot S Brar; Ray Zadegan
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2020-07-15       Impact factor: 1.900

6.  Impact of postprocedural permanent pacemaker implantation on clinical outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ziwei Xi; Tong Liu; Jing Liang; Yu-Jie Zhou; Wei Liu
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 2.895

7.  Metoprolol Improves Myocardial Remodeling and Cardiac Function in Patients with Permanent Pacemaker Implantation.

Authors:  Li Ye; Guofen Hu; Huamin Yu; Jindong Sun; Hong Yuan
Journal:  J Healthc Eng       Date:  2022-04-11       Impact factor: 3.822

8.  Prevalence, predictors, and prognosis of tricuspid regurgitation following permanent pacemaker implantation.

Authors:  Jiwon Seo; Dae-Young Kim; Iksung Cho; Geu-Ru Hong; Jong-Won Ha; Chi Young Shim
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-06-26       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  TAVI and Post Procedural Cardiac Conduction Abnormalities.

Authors:  Antonio Mangieri; Claudio Montalto; Matteo Pagnesi; Giuseppe Lanzillo; Ozan Demir; Luca Testa; Antonio Colombo; Azeem Latib
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2018-07-03

10.  Long-term Outcomes Associated With Permanent Pacemaker Implantation After Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement.

Authors:  Natalie Glaser; Michael Persson; Magnus Dalén; Ulrik Sartipy
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2021-07-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.