| Literature DB >> 29411351 |
Fabrizio Spada1, Tanya M Barnes1, Kerryn A Greive1.
Abstract
Derivatives of hydrocortisone, such as mometasone furoate, a (2') furoate-17 ester with chlorine substitutions at positions 9 and 21, have been designed to improve efficacy and reduce the incidence of adverse effects. An extensive literature search of MEDLINE, Embase and other databases was conducted to review the safety and efficacy of various formulations of topical mometasone furoate. Mometasone furoate exhibits high potency with greater anti-inflammatory activity and a longer duration of action than betamethasone. In clinical trials, mometasone furoate shows comparable or significantly better efficacy, depending on the comparator, in all indications studied in both adults and children. It is well tolerated with only transient, mild to moderate local adverse effects. It is characterised by low systemic availability due to its high lipophilicity, low percutaneous absorption and rapid hepatic biotransformation, and consequently has no significant effect on the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis. The molecular biotransformation of mometasone furoate in the skin results in a lower affinity with dermal cells than epidermal cells, which contributes to its low atrophogenicity. Sensitisation to mometasone furoate is low. Overall, mometasone furoate is a highly efficacious potent corticosteroid with a low risk of both local and systemic adverse effects.Entities:
Keywords: corticosteroid; eczema; mometasone furoate; psoriasis; seborrhoeic dermatitis
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29411351 PMCID: PMC6099284 DOI: 10.1111/ajd.12762
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Australas J Dermatol ISSN: 0004-8380 Impact factor: 2.875
Classification of the potency of commonly used topical corticosteroid preparations available in Australia. Adapted from Carlos and colleagues4
| Formulations available | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ointment | Cream | Lotion | Other | |
| Super potent (class 1 USA, class 1 UK) | ||||
| Betamethasone dipropionate 0.05% in optimised vehicle |
|
| ||
| Clobetasol propionate 0.05% | Shampoo | |||
| High potency (class 2/3 USA, class II UK) | ||||
| Betamethasone dipropionate 0.05% |
| |||
| Betamethasone valerate 0.1% |
|
| ||
| Mometasone furoate 0.1% |
|
|
| Hydrogel |
| Moderate potency (class 4/5 USA, class III UK) | ||||
| Betamethasone dipropionate 0.05% |
|
| ||
| Betamethasone valerate 0.02–0.05% |
|
| ||
| Triamcinolone acetonide 0.02% |
|
| ||
| Methylprednisolone aceponate 0.1% |
|
|
| |
| Clobetasone 0.05% |
| |||
| Desonide 0.05% |
| |||
| Low potency (class 6/7 USA, class IV UK) | ||||
| Hydrocortisone 0.5–1% |
| Spray | ||
| Hydrocortisone acetate 0.5–1% |
|
| ||
Figure 1Changes in hydrocortisone leading to the formation of mometasone furoate. Cl, chlorine.
Effect of topical mometasone furoate 0.1% ointment and cream on serum cortisol levels and its potential to cause skin atrophy
| Reference | Trial design | Treatment | Duration | Patients treated (evaluated) ( | Comparator potency | Safety ( | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Effect on serum cortisol levels | |||||||
| Higashi and colleagues | nb | MF 0.1% ung 10 g/day (20 h/day) oc | 5 days | 5 (5) | NA | No effect on serum cortisol levels | |
| Bressinck and colleagues | r, db, pg | MF 0.1% ung 15 g od | 3 weeks | 24 (24) | Slight change in plasma cortisol level from baseline for both MF and HYD, which was NS from each other; MF ≡ HYD | ||
| HYD 1.0% ung 15 g od | 24 (24) | Low | |||||
| Kecskés and colleagues | r, db | MF 0.1% ung 30 g od (22 h/day), 60% body oc | 5 days | 11 (11) | Both MF and MPA decreased serum cortisol levels to a similar extent; MF ≡ MPA | ||
| MPA 0.1% ung 30 g od (22 h/day), 60% body oc | 10 (10) | Moderate | |||||
| Visscher and colleagues | r, o, co | MF 0.1% cr 16 g/day (11 h/day) oc | 5 days | 12 (12) | Moderate | Both MF and HYDB produced significant suppression of plasma cortisol concentrations during treatment, however complete recovery of the adrenal function took place once treatment ceased; MF > HYDB | |
| HYDB 0.1% cr 16 g/day (11 h/day) oc | 12 (12) | ||||||
| Effect on the skin | |||||||
| Brasch in Prakash | o | MF 0.1% cr od | 52 weeks | 6 | NA | No clinical or histological signs of skin atrophy seen | |
| Katz and colleagues | bpc | MF 0.1% ung od | 6 weeks | 51 (51) | MF: mild skin thinning (1), moderate telangiectasia (1) | ||
| HYD 1.0% ung od | 51 (51) | Low | HYD: mild skin thinning (1); MF ≡ HYD | ||||
| Kerscher and colleagues | r, db | MF 0.1% ung od | 6 weeks | 12 | All treatments reduced skin thickness over 6 weeks, however this reduction was NS compared to baseline; PRD ≡ MF ≥ HYD ≡ V | ||
| HYD 1.0% ung bid | 12 | Low | |||||
| PRD 0.25% ung bid | 12 | Moderate | |||||
| V | 12 | NA | |||||
| Hoffmann and colleagues | r, db, ic | MF cr 200 mg od oc | 3 weeks | 10 (10) | NS changes in skin thickness as determined by ultrasound for all groups | ||
| HYD 0.1% cr 200 mg od oc | Low | ||||||
| MPA cr 200 mg od oc | Moderate | No signs of skin atrophy for all groups; MF ≡ MPA ≡ HYD ≡ V | |||||
| V (MF, MPA concentration unknown) | NA | ||||||
| Kecskés and colleagues | r, db, ic | MF 0.1% ung 3 × /week oc | 6 weeks | 20 (20) | MF: pronounced skin atrophy (10), moderate skin atrophy (8), slight skin atrophy (2), very pronounced telangiectasia (5), pronounced telangiectasia (12), moderate telangiectasia (2), slight telangiectasia (1) | ||
| MPA 0.1% ung 3×/week oc | 20 (20) | Moderate | MPA: slight skin atrophy (15), no skin atrophy (5), moderate telangiectasia (3), slight telangiectasia (13), no telangiectasia (4) | ||||
| V | 20 (20) | NA | V: slight skin atrophy (3), telangiectasia (0); MF > MPA | ||||
| Korting and colleagues | r, db | MF 0.1% ung bid | 6 weeks | 24 (22) | MF: skin thickness reduced by 17%; skin atrophy (2); telangiectasia (2) | ||
| BMV 0.1% ung bid | 24 (23) | High | BMV: skin thickness reduced by 24%; skin atrophy (2); telangiectasia (2) | ||||
| PRD 0.25% ung bid | 24 (23) | Moderate | PRD: skin thickness reduced by 13%; skin atrophy (0); telangiectasia (0) | ||||
| V | 24 (23) | NA | V: skin atrophy (0); telangiectasia (0); BMV > MF > PRD > V | ||||
| Koivukangas and colleagues | o, db | MF 0.1% cr od | 1 weeks | 15 (15) | No detectable effect on skin thickness was seen; MF ≡ BMV | ||
| BMV 0.1% cr bid | High | ||||||
| V | NA | No difference between MF and BMV in their ability to reduce collagen synthesis | |||||
Patients with psoriasis. bid, twice daily; BMV, betamethasone valerate; bpc, bilateral paired comparison; co, cross‐over; cr, cream; db, double blind; HYD, hydrocortisone; HYDB, hydrocortisone butyrate; ic, intra‐individual comparison; MF, mometasone furoate; MPA, methylprednisolone aceponate; NA, not applicable; nb, nonblind; NS, not significant; o, open label; oc, with occlusion; od, once daily; pg, parallel group; PRD, prednicarbate; r, randomised; ung, ointment; V, vehicle.