Literature DB >> 29411206

The toxicity of a mixture of two antiseptics, triclosan and triclocarban, on reproduction and growth of the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans.

Anna Katharina Vingskes1, Nicole Spann2.   

Abstract

Many widely used healthcare products contain antiseptics, whose persistence in aquatic environments, soils, and sediments leads to the contamination of ecosystems and adversely affects wildlife. Recently, the impact not only of high but also low doses of contaminants and mixtures of several chemicals has become a focus of concern. In this study, toxicity tests of the antiseptics triclosan (TCS) and triclocarban (TCC) were performed in an aquatic test medium using the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Nominal concentrations of TCS and TCC were tested in separate single-substance toxicity tests (96-h-exposure), focussing on growth and reproduction endpoints. Median effective concentrations (EC50s) from the single-substance tests were subsequently used to set up five different ratios of TCS:TCC mixtures leading to the same toxicity. Six dilutions of each mixture ratio were tested for effon reproduction of C. elegans. In the single-substance tests, TCC was about 30 times more toxic than TCS when considering effects on growth and concerning reproduction, TCC was about 50 times more toxic than TCS. For both substances, the toxic effect on reproduction was more pronounced than the one on growth. Low doses of TCS (1-10 µmol L-1) stimulated reproduction by up to 301% compared to the control, which might be due to endocrine disruption or other stress-related compensation responses (hormesis). Neither antiseptic stimulated growth. In the mixtures, increasing amounts of TCC inhibited the stimulatory effects of TCS on reproduction. In addition, the interactions of TCS and TCC were antagonistic, such that mixtures displayed lower toxicity than would have been expected when TCS and TCC mixtures adhered to the principle of concentration addition.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aquatic invertebrates; Dose-response modelling; Ecotoxicology; Endocrine disruption; Hormesis

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29411206     DOI: 10.1007/s10646-018-1905-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecotoxicology        ISSN: 0963-9292            Impact factor:   2.823


  53 in total

1.  Toward a unified approach to dose-response modeling in ecotoxicology.

Authors:  Christian Ritz
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 3.742

2.  Improved empirical models describing hormesis.

Authors:  Nina Cedergreen; Christian Ritz; Jens Carl Streibig
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 3.742

3.  Endocrine-related genes are altered by antibacterial agent triclosan in Chironomus riparius aquatic larvae.

Authors:  Pedro Martínez-Paz; Mónica Morales; Josune Urien; Gloria Morcillo; José Luis Martínez-Guitarte
Journal:  Ecotoxicol Environ Saf       Date:  2017-03-08       Impact factor: 6.291

4.  Steroid/thyroid hormone receptor genes in Caenorhabditis elegans.

Authors:  Z Kostrouch; M Kostrouchova; J E Rall
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1995-01-03       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  A high-throughput method for assessing chemical toxicity using a Caenorhabditis elegans reproduction assay.

Authors:  Windy A Boyd; Sandra J McBride; Julie R Rice; Daniel W Snyder; Jonathan H Freedman
Journal:  Toxicol Appl Pharmacol       Date:  2010-03-04       Impact factor: 4.219

6.  Predicted no effect concentration (PNEC) for triclosan to terrestrial species (invertebrates and plants).

Authors:  Mónica J B Amorim; Eva Oliveira; Amadeu M V M Soares; Janeck J Scott-Fordsmand
Journal:  Environ Int       Date:  2010-03-15       Impact factor: 9.621

7.  Chronic effects of triclocarban in the amphipod Gammarus locusta: Behavioural and biochemical impairment.

Authors:  Susana Barros; Rosa Montes; José Benito Quintana; Rosario Rodil; Jorge M A Oliveira; Miguel M Santos; Teresa Neuparth
Journal:  Ecotoxicol Environ Saf       Date:  2016-10-15       Impact factor: 6.291

8.  Terrestrial ecotoxicological effects of the antimicrobial agent triclosan.

Authors:  Feng Liu; Guang-Guo Ying; Li-Hua Yang; Qi-Xing Zhou
Journal:  Ecotoxicol Environ Saf       Date:  2008-08-15       Impact factor: 6.291

9.  Environmental Exposure of Aquatic and Terrestrial Biota to Triclosan and Triclocarban.

Authors:  Talia E Chalew; Rolf U Halden
Journal:  J Am Water Works Assoc       Date:  2009

10.  On the need and speed of regulating triclosan and triclocarban in the United States.

Authors:  Rolf U Halden
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2014-03-14       Impact factor: 9.028

View more
  1 in total

1.  Non-Ionic Surfactants Antagonize Toxicity of Potential Phenolic Endocrine-Disrupting Chemicals, Including Triclosan in Caenorhabditis elegans.

Authors:  Mohammad A Alfhili; Dong Suk Yoon; Taki A Faten; Jocelyn A Francis; Dong Seok Cha; Baohong Zhang; Xiaoping Pan; Myon-Hee Lee
Journal:  Mol Cells       Date:  2018-11-14       Impact factor: 5.034

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.