| Literature DB >> 29410503 |
Fernando Blanco1, Ana Rosa Gómez Cano2,3, Juan L Cantalapiedra4, M Soledad Domingo5,6, Laura Domingo5,7,8, Iris Menéndez5,8, Lawrence J Flynn9, Manuel Hernández Fernández5,8.
Abstract
The study of how long-term changes affect metacommunities is a relevant topic, that involves the evaluation of connections among biological assemblages across different spatio-temporal scales, in order to fully understand links between global changes and macroevolutionary patterns. We applied multivariate statistical analyses and diversity tests using a large data matrix of rodent fossil sites in order to analyse long-term faunal changes. Late Miocene rodent faunas from southwestern Europe were classified into metacommunities, presumably sharing ecological affinities, which followed temporal and environmental non-random assembly and disassembly patterns. Metacommunity dynamics of these faunas were driven by environmental changes associated with temperature variability, but there was also some influence from the aridity shifts described for this region during the late Miocene. Additionally, while variations in the structure of rodent assemblages were directly influenced by global climatic changes in the southern province, the northern sites showed a pattern of climatic influence mediated by diversity-dependent processes.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29410503 PMCID: PMC5802738 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-20900-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Rodent metacommunities cluster for the Iberoccitanian region during the latest middle Miocene to the Mio-Pliocene boundary. Metacommunities A, B, C and D are represented with different colours. Euclidean distance between nodes is shown at the bottom of the cluster and the coefficient of cophenetic correlation is shown at the top. Abbreviations for fossil sites as in Supplementary Table 1.
Figure 2Geographical and temporal replacement of rodent metacommunities in the Iberoccitanian Region from the latest middle Miocene to the Mio-Pliocene boundary. Each map represents one million of years, except the ones in the extremes of the temporal gradient. The colours of the different fossil sites correspond to the colours assigned to each metacommunity in Fig. 1. The arrows correspond the Vallesian Crisis (VC) and Messinian Salinity Crisis (MSC). Dotted line separate the northern and southern province. Figure created with Adobe Illustrator CS6 version 16.0.0.
Nestedness analyses for complete Iberoccitanian late Miocene rodent assemblages (Total). and for each faunal component (FC) in southern (left) and northern (right) provinces.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| South | 20.456 | 31.756 | <0.001 | North | 22.990 | 37.946 | <0.001 |
| FC I | 1.915 | 20.85 | <0.001 | FC I | — | — | — |
| FC II | 17.335 | 30.255 | 0.004 | FC II | 12.569 | 28.062 | <0.001 |
| FC III | 32.298 | 43.200 | 0.005 | FC III | 15.449 | 34.199 | 0.001 |
| FC IV | 7.054 | 26.157 | <0.001 | FC IV | — | — | — |
| FC V | 6.243 | 25.558 | <0.001 | FC V | 6.022 | 28.544 | <0.001 |
| FC VI | 9.999 | 34.77 | <0.001 | FC VI | 7.535 | 25.931 | 0.003 |
T, matrix temperature; RT, Random T, mean matrix temperature for 10000 randomly shuffled matrices; p, probability values based on the comparison between T and its distribution for 10000 randomly shuffled matrices.
Figure 3Changes in taxonomical diversity (above). Measured by Shannon index, for Iberoccitanian late Miocene rodent assemblages from the northern (blue, 27 fossil sites) and southern (orange, 90 fossil sites) provinces, compared with benthic foraminifera δ18O values (below) from Zachos et al.[33]. To visualize trends throughout the late Miocene, we applied a local regression fitting (LOESS) to diversity indexes. The smoothing parameter (λ) controls the balance between the goodness of fit of the model. Shaded areas represent the 95% confidence interval of the LOESS fit. The grey boxes represent the Vallesian Crisis (VC) and Messinian Salinity Crisis (MSC).
Figure 4Changes in the proportions of rodent families in the Iberoccitanian Region (southern province, left; northern province, right) across the latest middle Miocene to the Mio-Pliocene boundary.
Correlation between the taxonomical diversity, as measured by Shannon (H’) index with the isotopic value and nestedness ranking of the Iberoccitanian late Miocene rodent assemblages from the southern (S) and northern (N) provinces.
| δ18O | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| σ |
| σ |
| n | ||
| H' | N | 0,467 | 0,014 | −0,610 | <0,001 | 27 |
| S | 0,167 | 0,115 | −0,044 | 0,681 | 90 | |
σ Spearman correlation coefficient.
Correlation between proportion of species richness (%S), nestedness ranking and the isotopic value of the Iberoccitanian late Miocene rodent assemblages from the southern (left) and northern (right) provinces, for all the species (total) and for those included in each faunal component (FC).
| δ18O South | δ18O North | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| σ |
| n | σ |
| n | ||||
| NEST | Total | 0,258 | 0,014 | 90 | NEST | Total | −0,188 | 0,347 | 27 |
| FC I | −0,196 | 0,182 | 48 | FC I | — | — | — | ||
| FC II | 0,179 | 0,230 | 47 | FC II | −0,016 | 0,942 | 22 | ||
| FC III | 0,327 | 0,002 | 85 | FC III | −0,491 | 0,015 | 24 | ||
| FC IV | −0,384 | 0,013 | 41 | FC IV | — | — | — | ||
| FC V | 0,488 | 0,001 | 40 | FC V | 0,387 | 0,068 | 23 | ||
| FC VI | 0,533 | <0,001 | 39 | FC VI | 0,460 | 0,098 | 14 | ||
| %S | FC I | 0,291 | 0,045 | 48 | %S | FC I | −0,800 | 0,200 | 4 |
| FC II | −0,074 | 0,621 | 47 | FC II | 0,300 | 0,165 | 23 | ||
| FC III | 0,188 | 0,084 | 85 | FC III | 0,488 | 0,015 | 24 | ||
| FC IV | 0,297 | 0,059 | 41 | FC IV | — | — | 2 | ||
| FC V | −0,490 | 0,001 | 40 | FC V | −0,420 | 0,036 | 23 | ||
| FC VI | −0,817 | <0,001 | 39 | FC VI | −0,610 | 0,021 | 14 | ||
σ Spearman correlation coefficient. NEST, Nestedness correlation for total (S and N) and for theFCs
Figure 5Changes in the ecological structure of each metacommunity (A–D). According to the time series of faunal components percentage values (%FC), which represent percentages of species in each component (for colours representing each FC, see the legend at the bottom of the figure). Values for southern fossil sites (right) and northern fossil sites (left) are shown separately. See supplementary material for an in-deep explanation of this figure.