Literature DB >> 29410163

Management of Low-Risk Pulmonary Embolism Patients Without Hospitalization: The Low-Risk Pulmonary Embolism Prospective Management Study.

Joseph R Bledsoe1, Scott C Woller2, Scott M Stevens2, Valerie Aston3, Rich Patten4, Todd Allen5, Benjamin D Horne6, Lydia Dong7, James Lloyd8, Greg Snow9, Troy Madsen10, C Gregory Elliott11.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The efficacy and safety of managing patients with low-risk pulmonary embolism (PE) without hospitalization requires objective data from US medical centers. We sought to determine the 90-day composite rate of recurrent symptomatic VTE, major bleeding events, and all-cause mortality among consecutive patients diagnosed with acute low-risk PE managed without inpatient hospitalization; and to measure patient satisfaction.
METHODS: We performed a prospective cohort single-arm management study conducted from January 2013 to October 2016 in five EDs. We enrolled 200 consecutive adults diagnosed with objectively confirmed acute PE and assessed to have a low risk for mortality using the Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index (PESI) score (< 86), echocardiography, and whole-leg compression ultrasound (CUS). The primary intervention was observation in the ED or hospital (observation status) for > 12 to < 24 h, followed by outpatient management with Food and Drug Administration-approved therapeutic anticoagulation. Patients were excluded for a PESI ≥ 86, echocardiographic signs of right heart strain, DVT proximal to the popliteal vein, hypoxia, hypotension, hepatic or renal failure, contraindication to therapeutic anticoagulation, or another condition requiring hospital admission. The primary outcome was 90-day composite rate of all-cause mortality, recurrent symptomatic VTE, and major bleeding.
RESULTS: The composite outcome occurred in one of 200 patients (90-day composite rate = 0.5%; 95% CI, 0.02%-2.36%). No patient suffered recurrent VTE or died during the 90-day follow-up period. A major bleed occurred in one patient. Patients indicated a high level of satisfaction with their care.
CONCLUSIONS: Treatment of carefully selected patients with acute PE and low risk by PESI < 86, echocardiography, and CUS without inpatient hospitalization is safe and acceptable to patients. Results must be viewed with caution because of the small sample size relative to the end point and the generalizability surrounding availability of emergent echocardiography. TRIAL REGISTRY: ClinicalTrials.gov; No.: NCT02355548; URL: www.clinicaltrials.gov.
Copyright © 2018 American College of Chest Physicians. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  outpatient PE; pulmonary embolism

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29410163     DOI: 10.1016/j.chest.2018.01.035

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chest        ISSN: 0012-3692            Impact factor:   9.410


  18 in total

Review 1.  Systems-based hematology: highlighting successes and next steps.

Authors:  Jori E May; Patrick C Irelan; Kailee Boedeker; Emily Cahill; Steven Fein; David A Garcia; Lisa K Hicks; Janice Lawson; Ming Y Lim; Colleen T Morton; Anita Rajasekhar; Satish Shanbhag; Marc S Zumberg; Robert M Plovnick; Nathan T Connell
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2020-09-22

2.  Temporal Trends in the Practice Pattern for Venous Thromboembolism in Japan: Insight From JROAD-DPC.

Authors:  Yugo Yamashita; Takeshi Morimoto; Yusuke Yoshikawa; Hidenori Yaku; Yoko Sumita; Michikazu Nakai; Koh Ono; Takeshi Kimura
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2020-01-10       Impact factor: 5.501

3.  Challenges in Managing Isolated Subsegmental Pulmonary Embolism.

Authors:  David R Vinson; Dayna J Isaacs; Etsehiwot Taye; Mahesh J Balasubramanian
Journal:  Perm J       Date:  2021-12-03

Review 4.  Outpatient versus inpatient treatment for acute pulmonary embolism.

Authors:  Hugo Hb Yoo; Vania Santos Nunes-Nogueira; Paulo J Fortes Villas Boas; Cathryn Broderick
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2022-05-05

5.  Outpatient versus inpatient treatment for acute pulmonary embolism.

Authors:  Hugo Hb Yoo; Vania Santos Nunes-Nogueira; Paulo J Fortes Villas Boas; Cathryn Broderick
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-03-06

6.  A Computerized Method for Measuring Computed Tomography Pulmonary Angiography Yield in the Emergency Department: Validation Study.

Authors:  Safiya Richardson; Philip Solomon; Alexander O'Connell; Sundas Khan; Jonathan Gong; Alex Makhnevich; Guang Qiu; Meng Zhang; Thomas McGinn
Journal:  JMIR Med Inform       Date:  2018-10-25

7.  Emergency Department Patient Satisfaction with Treatment of Low-risk Pulmonary Embolism.

Authors:  Laura E Simon; Hilary R Iskin; Ridhima Vemula; Jie Huang; Adina S Rauchwerger; Mary E Reed; Dustin W Ballard; David R Vinson
Journal:  West J Emerg Med       Date:  2018-10-18

8.  Comprehensive Outpatient Management of Low-Risk Pulmonary Embolism: Can Primary Care Do This? A Narrative Review.

Authors:  David R Vinson; Drahomir Aujesky; Geert-Jan Geersing; Pierre-Marie Roy
Journal:  Perm J       Date:  2020-03-13

9.  Outpatient Management of Patients Following Diagnosis of Acute Pulmonary Embolism.

Authors:  Lauren M Westafer; Meng-Shiou Shieh; Penelope S Pekow; Mihaela S Stefan; Peter K Lindenauer
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2020-12-19       Impact factor: 3.451

10.  Monotherapy Anticoagulation to Expedite Home Treatment of Patients Diagnosed With Venous Thromboembolism in the Emergency Department: A Pragmatic Effectiveness Trial.

Authors:  Jeffrey A Kline; David H Adler; Naomi Alanis; Joseph R Bledsoe; Daniel M Courtney; James P d'Etienne; Deborah B Diercks; John S Garrett; Alan E Jones; David C Mackenzie; Troy Madsen; Andrew J Matuskowitz; Bryn E Mumma; Kristen E Nordenholz; Justine Pagenhardt; Michael S Runyon; William B Stubblefield; Christopher B Willoughby
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes       Date:  2021-06-21
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.