Literature DB >> 29409224

Arthroscopic versus open ankle arthrodesis.

Jonathan Quayle1, Roozbeh Shafafy2, Muhammad Asim Khan3, Koushik Ghosh2, Anthony Sakellariou2, Nikos Gougoulias2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: It is thought that arthroscopic ankle fusion offers improved outcomes over open fusion in terms of functional outcomes, time to fusion, length of stay and fewer complications. However, there are doubts about whether correction of established severe deformity can be achieved using the arthroscopic approach.
METHODS: A retrospective review of medical records and radiographs at our hospital identified consecutive tibio-talar ankle fusions between April 2009 and March 2014 with minimum 1 year follow up. Records were scrutinised for type of arthrodesis, demographics, length of stay (LOS), time to fusion (TTF), pre- and postoperative deformity, complications and unplanned procedures. Significant factors in the complication group were then compared, using multivariate binary logistic backward stepwise regression to see if any factors were predictive.
RESULTS: There were 29 open and 50 arthroscopic ankle fusions (2 converted to open). Mean LOS was 1.93 versus 2.52 days (p=0.590). TTF was shorter after arthroscopic fusion 196d versus 146d (p=0.083). Severe deformity (>10°) was correctable to within 5° of neutral in the majority of cases (97% versus 96%, p=0.903). Union occurred in 83% versus 98% (p=0.0134). The open arthrodesis group had 9 (31%) complications (1 death-PE, 1 SPN injury, 5 non-unions, 1 delayed union and 1 wound infection) and 6 (25%) screw removals. The arthroscopic arthrodesis group had 4 (8%) complications (1 non-union, 1 reactivation of osteomyelitis and subsequent BKA, 1 wound infection, 1 delayed union) with 11 (24%) screw removals. After multi-variant regression analysis of all ankle fusions, low BMI was shown to be associated with complications (p=0.064).
CONCLUSIONS: Open arthrodesis was associated with a higher rate of complications and a lower rate of fusion. However, there was no significant difference in terms of LOS and ability to correct deformity compared to arthroscopic arthrodesis. Overall, low BMI was also associated with more complications.
Copyright © 2017 European Foot and Ankle Society. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ankle; Arthrodesis; Arthroscopic; Open

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29409224     DOI: 10.1016/j.fas.2017.01.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Foot Ankle Surg        ISSN: 1268-7731            Impact factor:   2.705


  14 in total

1.  Arthroscopic ankle fusion to manage sequel of loss of lateral malleoli in compound crushed ankle injury.

Authors:  Sudarsan Behera; Bishnu Prasad Patro; Sudhanshu Sekhar Das; Saroj Kumar Patra
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2018-12-14

2.  The need for a paradigm shift in the rehabilitation of elective foot and ankle reconstructive surgery patients? An annotation.

Authors:  Amirah Essop-Adam; Linzy Houchen-Wolloff; Raju Vaishya; Jitendra Mangwani
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2020-04-08

3.  Patient and Surgical Factors Affecting Fusion Rates After Arthroscopic and Open Ankle Fusion: A Review of a High-Risk Cohort.

Authors:  Ashish B Shah; William Davis; Zachary L Littlefield; Sean Young; Bradley Alexander; Nicholas A Andrews; Ankit Khurana; Benjamin Cage; Tanvee Sinha; Gerald McGwin; Ashish Shah
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2022-04-25       Impact factor: 1.033

Review 4.  Role of Arthroscopy in Various Ankle Disorders.

Authors:  Rajiv Shah; Vidya Sagar Bandikalla
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2021-02-12       Impact factor: 1.251

Review 5.  [Open or arthroscopic arthrodesis of the ankle joint : Which is better?]

Authors:  Tomas Buchhorn; Hans Polzer; Dominik Szymski
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2022-01-23       Impact factor: 1.000

6.  Open versus arthroscopic ankle arthrodesis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Tsz Ngai Mok; Qiyu He; Soundarya Panneerselavam; Huajun Wang; Huige Hou; Xiaofei Zheng; Jinghua Pan; Jieruo Li
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2020-05-24       Impact factor: 2.359

7.  Re-arthrodesis after primary ankle fusion: 134/1,716 cases from the Swedish Ankle Registry.

Authors:  Anders Henricson; Lars Jehpsson; Åke Carlsson; Björn E Rosengren
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2018-06-27       Impact factor: 3.717

8.  Initial stability and stress distribution of ankle arthroscopic arthrodesis with three kinds of 2-screw configuration fixation: a finite element analysis.

Authors:  Min Zhu; Cheng-Song Yuan; Zhong-Min Jin; Yun-Jiao Wang; You-Xing Shi; Zhi-Jin Yang; Kanglai Tang
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2018-10-20       Impact factor: 2.359

9.  Pedobarographic analysis of body weight distribution on the lower limbs and balance after ankle arthrodesis with Ilizarov fixation and internal fixation.

Authors:  Piotr Morasiewicz; Grzegorz Konieczny; Maciej Dejnek; Leszek Morasiewicz; Wiktor Urbański; Mirosław Kulej; Szymon Łukasz Dragan; Szymon Feliks Dragan; Łukasz Pawik
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2018-11-26       Impact factor: 2.819

10.  Finite element analysis of the initial stability of arthroscopic ankle arthrodesis with three-screw fixation: posteromedial versus posterolateral home-run screw.

Authors:  Sen Wang; Jian Yu; Xin Ma; Dahang Zhao; Xiang Geng; Jiazhang Huang; Xu Wang
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2020-07-10       Impact factor: 2.359

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.