Ilhan Alcelik1, Zubair M Saeed2, Ben A Haughton3, Rizwan Shahid4, John C Alcelik5, Craig Brogden6, Adam Budgen7. 1. Department of Orthopaedics, York Hospital, Wigginton Road, York YO31 8HE, United Kingdom. Electronic address: ialcelik67@gmail.com. 2. Department of Orthopaedics, York Hospital, Wigginton Road, York YO31 8HE, United Kingdom. Electronic address: zubair.saeed@doctors.org.uk. 3. Department of Orthopaedics, York Hospital, Wigginton Road, York YO31 8HE, United Kingdom. Electronic address: b.a.haughton@gmail.com. 4. Department of Orthopaedics, York Hospital, Wigginton Road, York YO31 8HE, United Kingdom. Electronic address: rizwanshahid@gmail.com. 5. Year 12, All Saints RC School, Mill Mount Lane, York YO24 1BJ, United Kingdom. Electronic address: jalcelik@gmail.com. 6. Department of Orthopaedics, York Hospital, Wigginton Road, York YO31 8HE, United Kingdom. Electronic address: brogden@ntlworld.com. 7. Department of Orthopaedics, York Hospital, Wigginton Road, York YO31 8HE, United Kingdom. Electronic address: adam.budgen@btinternet.com.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Open Achilles tendon repairs (OATR) are associated with high complication rates. Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) techniques like the Achillon Achilles tendon repair (AATR) were developed to reduce this. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare OATR with AATR. METHODS: We performed an extensive literature search including all studies that compared the two techniques. Outcomes assessed included overall complication rate, re-rupture rate, sural nerve injury, wound length, The American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Scores (AOFAS) scores and return to sports. RESULTS: Eight studies were suitable for inclusion totalling 210 patients in the AATR group vs 233 patients in the OATR group. Total complication rates were significantly reduced in the Achillon patients with odd ratio of 0.14 (CI 95%, 0.08-0.27, P<0.00001) in favour. There were no significant differences in re-rupture rate, sural nerve injury, return to sports and AOFAS scores following repair between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: AATR has fewer overall complications compared with OATR. It should be considered as an alternative to open surgical repair.
BACKGROUND: Open Achilles tendon repairs (OATR) are associated with high complication rates. Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) techniques like the Achillon Achilles tendon repair (AATR) were developed to reduce this. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare OATR with AATR. METHODS: We performed an extensive literature search including all studies that compared the two techniques. Outcomes assessed included overall complication rate, re-rupture rate, sural nerve injury, wound length, The American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Scores (AOFAS) scores and return to sports. RESULTS: Eight studies were suitable for inclusion totalling 210 patients in the AATR group vs 233 patients in the OATR group. Total complication rates were significantly reduced in the Achillon patients with odd ratio of 0.14 (CI 95%, 0.08-0.27, P<0.00001) in favour. There were no significant differences in re-rupture rate, sural nerve injury, return to sports and AOFAS scores following repair between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: AATR has fewer overall complications compared with OATR. It should be considered as an alternative to open surgical repair.