Literature DB >> 29409049

Theory and practice of electron diffraction from single atoms and extended objects using an EMPAD.

Michael C Cao1, Yimo Han1, Zhen Chen1, Yi Jiang2, Kayla X Nguyen3, Emrah Turgut1, Gregory D Fuchs1,4, David A Muller1,4.   

Abstract

What does the diffraction pattern from a single atom look like? How does it differ from the scattering from long-range potential? With the development of new high-dynamic range pixel array detectors to measure the complete momentum distribution, these questions have immediate relevance for designing and understanding momentum-resolved imaging modes. We explore the asymptotic limits of long-range and short-range potentials. We use a simple quantum mechanical model to explain the general and asymptotic limits for the probability distribution in both real and reciprocal space. Features in the scattering potential much larger than the probe size cause the bright field (BF) disk to deflect uniformly, while features much smaller than the probe size, instead of a deflection, cause a redistribution of intensity within the BF disk. Because long-range and short-range features are encoded differently in the diffraction pattern, it is possible to separate their contributions in differential phase-contrast (DPC) or center-of-mass (CoM) imaging. The shape profiles for atomic resolution CoM imaging are dominated by the shape of the probe gradient and not the highly singular atomic potentials or their local fields. Instead, only the peak height shows an atomic number sensitivity, whose precise dependence is determined by the convergence angle. At lower convergence angles, the contrast oscillates with increasing atomic number, similar to BF imaging. The range of collection angles impacts DPC and CoM imaging differently, with CoM being more sensitive to the upper cutoff limit, while DPC is more sensitive to the lower cutoff.

Entities:  

Year:  2018        PMID: 29409049     DOI: 10.1093/jmicro/dfx123

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Microscopy (Oxf)        ISSN: 2050-5698            Impact factor:   1.571


  5 in total

1.  Spatial Mapping of Electrostatic Fields in 2D Heterostructures.

Authors:  Akshay A Murthy; Stephanie M Ribet; Teodor K Stanev; Pufan Liu; Kenji Watanabe; Takashi Taniguchi; Nathaniel P Stern; Roberto Dos Reis; Vinayak P Dravid
Journal:  Nano Lett       Date:  2021-08-27       Impact factor: 12.262

2.  Measuring and directing charge transfer in heterogenous catalysts.

Authors:  Michael J Zachman; Victor Fung; Felipe Polo-Garzon; Shaohong Cao; Jisue Moon; Zhennan Huang; De-En Jiang; Zili Wu; Miaofang Chi
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-06-06       Impact factor: 17.694

3.  Direct visualization of anionic electrons in an electride reveals inhomogeneities.

Authors:  Qiang Zheng; Tianli Feng; Jordan A Hachtel; Ryo Ishikawa; Yongqiang Cheng; Luke Daemen; Jie Xing; Juan Carlos Idrobo; Jiaqiang Yan; Naoya Shibata; Yuichi Ikuhara; Brian C Sales; Sokrates T Pantelides; Miaofang Chi
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2021-04-07       Impact factor: 14.136

4.  Sub-Ångstrom electric field measurements on a universal detector in a scanning transmission electron microscope.

Authors:  Jordan A Hachtel; Juan Carlos Idrobo; Miaofang Chi
Journal:  Adv Struct Chem Imaging       Date:  2018-08-24

5.  Mixed-state electron ptychography enables sub-angstrom resolution imaging with picometer precision at low dose.

Authors:  Zhen Chen; Michal Odstrcil; Yi Jiang; Yimo Han; Ming-Hui Chiu; Lain-Jong Li; David A Muller
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2020-06-12       Impact factor: 14.919

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.