Literature DB >> 29408828

Clinical Features, Antibiotic Susceptibility Profile, and Outcomes of Infectious Keratitis Caused by Stenotrophomonas maltophilia.

Sotiria Palioura1, Allister Gibbons1, Darlene Miller1, Terrence P OʼBrien1, Eduardo C Alfonso1, Oriel Spierer1,2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, an uncommon cause of infectious keratitis, is difficult to treat because of its resistance to multiple antibiotics. The purpose of this study is to describe the clinical features, antibiotic susceptibility profile, and outcomes of S. maltophilia keratitis.
METHODS: A retrospective review of records from 1987 to 2016 identified 26 eyes of 26 patients who were treated at the Bascom Palmer Eye Institute for an S. maltophilia corneal ulcer. Clinical data were analyzed as to predisposing factors, clinical presentation, antibiotic susceptibility, treatment selection, and clinical outcomes.
RESULTS: Median age at presentation was 65 years (range, 16-98). Twelve patients were using topical corticosteroids, 8 patients had a history of penetrating keratoplasty, and 9 were contact lens wearers. All patients received topical antibiotics, 2 required therapeutic penetrating keratoplasty, and 1 was enucleated. At presentation, 57.7% (15/26) of the patients had visual acuity of 20/400 or worse. At the final visit, only 30.4% (7/23) of the patients had visual acuity worse than 20/400, whereas 65.2% (15/23) of the patients had 20/100 or better. Almost all isolates (25/26, 96.2%) were susceptible to fluoroquinolones and 77.3% (17/22) of them to polymyxin B/trimethoprim. Only 33.3% (5/15) of the tested isolates were susceptible to aminoglycosides and 58.3% (7/12) to cephalosporins.
CONCLUSIONS: Infectious keratitis due to S. maltophilia presents a treatment challenge because of its resistance to aminoglycosides and cephalosporins, which are typically used for empiric broad-spectrum gram-negative coverage as fortified solutions. Fluoroquinolones and polymyxin B/trimethoprim should be considered instead in cases of S. maltophilia infection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29408828      PMCID: PMC5806132          DOI: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000001486

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cornea        ISSN: 0277-3740            Impact factor:   2.651


  41 in total

1.  Antimicrobial susceptibilities of a worldwide collection of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia isolates tested against tigecycline and agents commonly used for S. maltophilia infections.

Authors:  David J Farrell; Helio S Sader; Ronald N Jones
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2010-04-05       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Emerging importance of multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter species and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia as pathogens in seriously ill patients: geographic patterns, epidemiological features, and trends in the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program (1997-1999).

Authors:  A C Gales; R N Jones; K R Forward; J Liñares; H S Sader; J Verhoef
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2001-05-15       Impact factor: 9.079

3.  Antimicrobial susceptibility of Gram-negative organisms isolated from patients hospitalised with pneumonia in US and European hospitals: results from the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program, 2009-2012.

Authors:  Helio S Sader; David J Farrell; Robert K Flamm; Ronald N Jones
Journal:  Int J Antimicrob Agents       Date:  2014-02-07       Impact factor: 5.283

Review 4.  Stenotrophomonas maltophilia: an emerging global opportunistic pathogen.

Authors:  Joanna S Brooke
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 26.132

5.  In vitro activity of plazomicin against 5,015 gram-negative and gram-positive clinical isolates obtained from patients in canadian hospitals as part of the CANWARD study, 2011-2012.

Authors:  A Walkty; H Adam; M Baxter; A Denisuik; P Lagacé-Wiens; J A Karlowsky; D J Hoban; G G Zhanel
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2014-02-18       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  Non-susceptibility trends among Pseudomonas aeruginosa and other non-fermentative Gram-negative bacteria from bacteraemias in the UK and Ireland, 2001-06.

Authors:  David M Livermore; Russell Hope; Geraldine Brick; Mark Lillie; Rosy Reynolds
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 5.790

7.  Co-infection of the human cornea with Stenotrophomonas maltophilia and Aspergillus fumigatus.

Authors:  Beom-Jin Cho; Geun-Jang Lee; Seung-Yeun Ha; Yiel-Hea Seo; Hungwon Tchah
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 2.651

Review 8.  Attributable mortality of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia infections: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Matthew E Falagas; Antonia C Kastoris; Evridiki K Vouloumanou; Petros I Rafailidis; Anastasios M Kapaskelis; George Dimopoulos
Journal:  Future Microbiol       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 3.165

9.  Identification and susceptibility to multipurpose disinfectant solutions of bacteria isolated from contact lens storage cases of patients with corneal infiltrative events.

Authors:  Simon Kilvington; Joseph Shovlin; Marina Nikolic
Journal:  Cont Lens Anterior Eye       Date:  2013-03-01       Impact factor: 3.077

10.  Global assessment of the antimicrobial activity of polymyxin B against 54 731 clinical isolates of Gram-negative bacilli: report from the SENTRY antimicrobial surveillance programme (2001-2004).

Authors:  A C Gales; R N Jones; H S Sader
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Infect       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 8.067

View more
  2 in total

1.  Advances in the Microbiology of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia.

Authors:  Joanna S Brooke
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2021-05-26       Impact factor: 50.129

2.  Characteristics of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia infection in children in Sichuan, China, from 2010 to 2017.

Authors:  Lili Wang; Wei Zhou; Yang Cao; Chunsong Yang; Hanmin Liu; Ting Chen; Lina Chen
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 1.817

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.