Literature DB >> 29408772

Cervical spine surgery for tandem spinal stenosis: The impact on low back pain.

Matthew D Alvin1, Vincent J Alentado2, Daniel Lubelski3, Edward C Benzel4, Thomas E Mroz5.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Retrospective Cohort.
OBJECTIVE: Tandem spinal stenosis (TSS) can present similarly to cervical myelopathy, but often has a worse prognosis. Few studies have investigated outcomes and compared treatment approaches for patients with TSS. We sought to determine the impact of cervical spine surgery on cervical and lumbar spine symptoms in patients with symptomatic tandem spinal stenosis. PATIENTS
METHODS: 84 patients with TSS were identified over 5 years. 48 underwent cervical spine surgery alone, 20 underwent both cervical and lumbar spine surgery, and 16 received conservative treatment alone (conservative cohort). Quality of life (QOL) measures included the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for arm, neck, and back pain, and EuroQOL-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D). QOL data were acquired at baseline (pre-operative) and 1 year postoperatively via an institutional prospectively collected database.
RESULTS: Both surgical cohorts showed significant (p < 0.01) pre- to postoperative improvement for VAS neck and arm scores at 1-year post-op and significantly (p < 0.01) greater improvements than the conservative cohort. In addition, the cohort undergoing cervical spine surgery alone experienced significant improvement in the EQ-5D score whereas those undergoing both cervical and lumbar spine surgery did not.
CONCLUSIONS: Cervical spine surgery with or without follow-up lumbar spine surgery significantly improves neck pain in patients with TSS. In contrast, cervical spine surgery in these patients does not improve lumbar symptoms. Lumbar surgery also did not improve low back pain or quality of life. Future prospective studies are necessary to examine the impact of lumbar decompression alone on cervical spine symptoms in patients with TSS.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cervical fusion; Lumbar fusion; Tandem spinal stenosis

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29408772     DOI: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2018.01.024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Neurol Neurosurg        ISSN: 0303-8467            Impact factor:   1.876


  5 in total

1.  Simultaneous or Staged Decompressions for Patients with Tandem Spinal Stenosis.

Authors:  Wei-Zong Sun; Xu Yan; Ya-Lin Yang; Hong Song; Zi-Wei Xia; Shi-Chang Yang; Fu-Lin Chen; Wen-Hui Li; Zi-Qi Yu; Bin Liu; Yu-Xin Liu; Kai Wang; Liang Zhang
Journal:  Orthop Surg       Date:  2021-05-04       Impact factor: 2.071

2.  Simultaneous or staged operation for tandem spinal stenosis: surgical strategy and efficacy comparison.

Authors:  Junming Cao; Xianda Gao; Yipeng Yang; Tao Lei; Yong Shen; Linfeng Wang; Zheng Tian
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2021-03-24       Impact factor: 2.359

3.  Extent and characteristic of relationships in canal dimension and canal body ratio between cervical and lumbar spine.

Authors:  Jung-Hee Lee; Kyung-Chung Kang; Ki-Tack Kim; Yong-Chan Kim; Tae-Soo Chang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-09-16       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 4.  Current understanding of tandem spinal stenosis: epidemiology, diagnosis, and surgical strategy.

Authors:  Qiushi Bai; Yuanyi Wang; Jiliang Zhai; Jigong Wu; Yan Zhang; Yu Zhao
Journal:  EFORT Open Rev       Date:  2022-08-04

5.  Best cutoff score of cervical-pedicle thickness as a morphological parameter for predicting cervical central stenosis.

Authors:  Jungho Choi; Hyung-Bok Park; Taeha Lim; Shin Wook Yi; Sooho Lee; Sukhee Park; SoYoon Park; Jungmin Yi; Young Uk Kim
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2022-08-19       Impact factor: 1.817

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.