Literature DB >> 29408741

A Swedish population-based evaluation of benign hysterectomy, comparing minimally invasive and abdominal surgery.

Nina K Billfeldt1, Christer Borgfeldt2, Håkan Lindkvist3, Jan-Henrik Stjerndahl4, Maud Ankardal5.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim was to evaluate surgical routes for benign hysterectomy in a Swedish population, including abdominal and minimally invasive surgery. STUDY
DESIGN: Prospectively collected data from the Swedish National GynOp Registry 2009-2015: 13 806 hysterectomy cases were included: abdominal (AH, n = 7485), vaginal (VH, n = 3767), conventional laparoscopic (LH, n = 1539) and robotically-assisted (RAH, n = 1015).
RESULTS: The VH group had the shortest operation time at 75 min, AH 97 min and RAH 104 min. LH was longest at 127 min (p < 0.005). The mean estimated blood loss was higher in the AH group (250 ml) compared to all minimally invasive surgery (MIS, 65-172 ml); p < 0.005). Conversion rates were 10% for LH, 4.8% for VH and 1.6% for RAH (p < 0.005). Hospitalization and patient-reported time to normal activities of daily living (ADL) were longer for AH compared to MIS (p < 0.005). Time to return to work was eight days longer in the AH group (35 days) compared with the MIS groups (p < 0.005). Complications were fewest in the VH group at 5.4% compared with AH 7.6% and RAH 8.7% (both p < 0.001), but did not significantly differ from the LH group at 6.6%. Overall patient satisfaction was reported to be 86-94% one year after surgery.
CONCLUSION: Women operated on for benign hysterectomy with minimally invasive methods in Sweden 2009-2015 had reduced length of hospitalization, as well as time to resuming normal ADL and return to work, compared to AH. Postoperative outcome measures were improved by minimally invasive methods and MIS should preferably be used.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Hysterectomy; Laparoscopy; Minimally invasive approach; Robotic; Surgical route

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29408741     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2018.01.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol        ISSN: 0301-2115            Impact factor:   2.435


  5 in total

1.  Racial/Ethnic Differences in the Risk of Surgical Complications and Posthysterectomy Hospitalization among Women Undergoing Hysterectomy for Benign Conditions.

Authors:  Lisa M Pollack; Jerry L Lowder; Matt Keller; Su-Hsin Chang; Sarah J Gehlert; Margaret A Olsen
Journal:  J Minim Invasive Gynecol       Date:  2021-01-01       Impact factor: 4.137

2.  Regional variation of hysterectomy for benign uterine diseases in Switzerland.

Authors:  Nina Stoller; Maria M Wertli; Tabea M Zaugg; Alan G Haynes; Arnaud Chiolero; Nicolas Rodondi; Radoslaw Panczak; Drahomir Aujesky
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-05-14       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Risk Factors for Impaired Patient-Reported Satisfaction and Increased Length of Hospital Stay Following Hysterectomy on Benign Indications in Premenopausal Women: a Study From the Swedish National Register for Gynecological Surgery.

Authors:  Ninnie Borendal Wodlin
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2019-10-23       Impact factor: 2.915

4.  Changes in route of hysterectomy in Norway since introduction of robotic approach.

Authors:  M L Johanson; M Lieng
Journal:  Facts Views Vis Obgyn       Date:  2021-03-31

5.  Healthcare and Indirect Cost of the Laparoscopic vs. Vaginal Approach in Benign Hysterectomy.

Authors:  María Ángeles Martínez-Maestre; Francisco Jódar-Sánchez; Ana María Calderón-Cabrera; Carmen González-Cejudo; José Manuel Silván-Alfaro; Lidia María Melero-Cortés
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2022 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 1.789

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.