Literature DB >> 29408643

Open cholecystectomy: Exposure and confidence of surgical trainees and new fellows.

Beth M Campbell1, Andreas L Lambrianides2, Joel M Dulhunty3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The laparoscopic approach to cholecystectomy has overtaken open procedures in terms of frequency, despite open procedures playing an important role in certain clinical situations. This study explored exposure and confidence of Australasian surgical trainees and new fellows in performing an open versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: An online survey was disseminated via the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons to senior general surgery trainees (years 3-5 of surgical training) and new fellows (fellowship within the previous 5 years). The survey included questions regarding level of experience and confidence in performing an open cholecystectomy and converting from a laparoscopic to an open approach.
RESULTS: A total of 135 participants responded; 58 (43%) were surgical trainees, 58 (43%) were fellows and 19 (14%) did not specify their level of training. Respondents who were involved in more than 20 open cholecystectomy procedures as an assistant or independent operator compared with those less exposed were more likely to feel confident to independently perform an elective open cholecystectomy (87.8% vs. 57.3%, P = 0.001), independently convert from a laparoscopic to open cholecystectomy (87.8% vs. 58.7%, P = 0.001) and independently perform an open cholecystectomy as a surgical consultant based on their level of exposure as a trainee (73.2% vs. 45.3%, P = 0.004).
CONCLUSION: This study suggests the need to ensure surgical trainees are exposed to sufficient open cholecystectomies to enable confidence and skill with performing these procedures when indicated. Greater recognition of the need for exposure during training, including meaningful simulation, may assist. Crown
Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Conversion to open surgery; Laparoscopy; Learning curve; Minimally invasive surgical procedures; Simulation training

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29408643     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2018.01.037

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Surg        ISSN: 1743-9159            Impact factor:   6.071


  3 in total

1.  Decline of open surgical experience for general surgery residents.

Authors:  Katherine Bingmer; Asya Ofshteyn; Sharon L Stein; Jeffrey M Marks; Emily Steinhagen
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-06-10       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Current Evidence for Minimally Invasive Surgery During the COVID-19 Pandemic and Risk Mitigation Strategies: A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Sami A Chadi; Keegan Guidolin; Antonio Caycedo-Marulanda; Abdu Sharkawy; Antonino Spinelli; Fayez A Quereshy; Allan Okrainec
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2020-05-20       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Ten-year Audit of Safe Bail-Out Alternatives to the Critical View of Safety in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Dimitrios K Manatakis; Dimitrios Papageorgiou; Maria-Ioanna Antonopoulou; Nikolaos Stamos; Christos Agalianos; Nikolaos Ivros; Demetrios Davides; Georgios Pechlivanides; Ioannis Kyriazanos
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 3.352

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.