Literature DB >> 29408496

Steroid Allergy: Clinical Features and the Importance of Excipient Testing in a Diagnostic Algorithm.

Philip H Li1, Annette Wagner2, Iason Thomas3, Timothy J Watts3, Ryszard Rutkowski4, Krzysztof Rutkowski3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: True corticosteroid (CS) allergy is rare. Instead, many patients may be allergic to excipients found in various CS preparations. Excipient testing is frequently overlooked. It might lead to unnecessary CS avoidance or dangerous re-exposure.
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the clinical characteristics and frequency of excipient allergy in patients with confirmed type I hypersensitivity to systemic CS preparations.
METHODS: Patients with a confirmed diagnosis of allergy (positive skin test or drug provocation test [DPT]) or tolerance (negative DPT to CS) over the past 10 years were studied. Patient characteristics, index CS, route of administration, clinical indications, symptoms of index reaction, and outcomes of CS/excipient allergy testing were analyzed.
RESULTS: Sixty-four patients underwent CS allergy testing. True CS allergy was confirmed in 9 of 64 (14%) patients. The majority (5/9, 56%) with positive skin tests or DPT were actually allergic to the excipients (2 to carboxymethylcellulose and 3 to polyethylene glycol) rather than the CS. Respiratory manifestations were significantly associated with confirmed allergy (odds ratio = 6.79 [95% confidence interval = 1.36-34.03], P = .02).
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with respiratory manifestations were significantly more likely to be truly allergic. CS allergies are rare and may be overdiagnosed without excipient testing. We suggest the use of Carmellose eye drops as a readily available source of carboxymethylcellulose for testing and propose a comprehensive diagnostic algorithm for suspected CS allergy.
Copyright © 2018 American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Allergy; Corticosteroid; Excipient; Hypersensitivity; Steroid

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29408496     DOI: 10.1016/j.jaip.2018.01.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract


  6 in total

1.  Delabeling Delayed Drug Hypersensitivity: How Far Can You Safely Go?

Authors:  Rannakoe J Lehloenya; Jonny G Peter; Ana Copascu; Jason A Trubiano; Elizabeth J Phillips
Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract       Date:  2020-10

Review 2.  Hidden Dangers: Recognizing Excipients as Potential Causes of Drug and Vaccine Hypersensitivity Reactions.

Authors:  Maria Luisa Caballero; Matthew S Krantz; Santiago Quirce; Elizabeth J Phillips; Cosby A Stone
Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract       Date:  2021-03-15

3.  Consensus Statements on the Approach to COVID-19 Vaccine Allergy Safety in Hong Kong.

Authors:  Valerie Chiang; Agnes S Y Leung; Elaine Y L Au; Marco H K Ho; Tak Hong Lee; Adrian Y Y Wu; Gary W K Wong; Philip H Li
Journal:  Front Allergy       Date:  2021-07-14

Review 4.  Multifaceted Actions of Succinate as a Signaling Transmitter Vary with Its Cellular Locations.

Authors:  Yuqi Guo; Sun Wook Cho; Deepak Saxena; Xin Li
Journal:  Endocrinol Metab (Seoul)       Date:  2020-03

Review 5.  Advances and novel developments in molecular allergology.

Authors:  Öykü Üzülmez; Tanja Kalic; Heimo Breiteneder
Journal:  Allergy       Date:  2020-09-22       Impact factor: 14.710

6.  Diagnosis and management of the drug hypersensitivity reactions in Coronavirus disease 19: An EAACI Position Paper.

Authors:  Aslı Gelincik; Knut Brockow; Gülfem E Çelik; Inmaculada Doña; Cristobalina Mayorga; Antonino Romano; Özge Soyer; Marina Atanaskovic-Markovic; Annick Barbaud; Maria Jose Torres
Journal:  Allergy       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 14.710

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.