Florian J Fintelmann1, Fabian M Troschel2, Julia Mario2, Yves R Chretien2, Sheila J Knoll3, Ashok Muniappan3, Henning A Gaissert3. 1. Department of Radiology, Division of Thoracic Imaging and Intervention, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts. Electronic address: fintelmann@mgh.harvard.edu. 2. Department of Radiology, Division of Thoracic Imaging and Intervention, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts. 3. Department of Surgery, Division of Thoracic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Assessment of risk associated with lung cancer resection is primarily based on evaluation of cardiopulmonary function and remains imprecise. We investigated the relationship between thoracic muscle and early outcomes after lobectomy. METHODS: Cross-sectional area of skeletal muscle was measured at the level of the fifth thoracic vertebra on computed tomography in 135 consecutive patients before lobectomy for lung cancer. Patients were stratified into low and high muscle groups using the sex-specific muscle median. Primary outcome was a composite of any postoperative complication as per The Society of Thoracic Surgeons General Thoracic Surgical Database. Secondary outcomes included postoperative respiratory complications, postoperative intensive care unit admission, hospital length of stay, and hospital readmission within 30 days of hospital discharge. The χ2 test, adjusted multivariable regression analysis, and likelihood ratio test were performed. RESULTS: Patients with low muscle were significantly more likely to have any postoperative complication and respiratory postoperative complications. Although postoperative intensive care unit admission was similar for low muscle and high muscle groups, low muscle patients had longer hospital length of stay and a higher rate of hospital readmission. Adjusted multivariable regression revealed the independent association of thoracic muscle with all outcomes. The likelihood ratio test suggested that thoracic muscle adds predictive capability to information captured by preoperative pulmonary function testing. CONCLUSIONS: Low thoracic muscle is independently associated with increased postoperative complications and health care utilization among patients undergoing lobectomy for lung cancer. Evaluation of thoracic muscle may enhance risk prediction models.
BACKGROUND: Assessment of risk associated with lung cancer resection is primarily based on evaluation of cardiopulmonary function and remains imprecise. We investigated the relationship between thoracic muscle and early outcomes after lobectomy. METHODS: Cross-sectional area of skeletal muscle was measured at the level of the fifth thoracic vertebra on computed tomography in 135 consecutive patients before lobectomy for lung cancer. Patients were stratified into low and high muscle groups using the sex-specific muscle median. Primary outcome was a composite of any postoperative complication as per The Society of Thoracic Surgeons General Thoracic Surgical Database. Secondary outcomes included postoperative respiratory complications, postoperative intensive care unit admission, hospital length of stay, and hospital readmission within 30 days of hospital discharge. The χ2 test, adjusted multivariable regression analysis, and likelihood ratio test were performed. RESULTS:Patients with low muscle were significantly more likely to have any postoperative complication and respiratory postoperative complications. Although postoperative intensive care unit admission was similar for low muscle and high muscle groups, low muscle patients had longer hospital length of stay and a higher rate of hospital readmission. Adjusted multivariable regression revealed the independent association of thoracic muscle with all outcomes. The likelihood ratio test suggested that thoracic muscle adds predictive capability to information captured by preoperative pulmonary function testing. CONCLUSIONS: Low thoracic muscle is independently associated with increased postoperative complications and health care utilization among patients undergoing lobectomy for lung cancer. Evaluation of thoracic muscle may enhance risk prediction models.
Authors: Fabian M Troschel; Qianna Jin; Florian Eichhorn; Thomas Muley; Till D Best; Konstantin S Leppelmann; Chi-Fu Jeffrey Yang; Amelie S Troschel; Hauke Winter; Claus P Heußel; Henning A Gaissert; Florian J Fintelmann Journal: Cancer Med Date: 2021-08-19 Impact factor: 4.452
Authors: J Koehler; Y Boirie; L Bensid; B Pereira; N Ghelis; C Dupuis; A Tournadre; L Boyer; L Cassagnes Journal: Clin Nutr Date: 2022-01-30 Impact factor: 7.324
Authors: Stefania Rizzo; Francesco Petrella; Claudia Bardoni; Lorenzo Bramati; Andrea Cara; Shehab Mohamed; Davide Radice; Giorgio Raia; Filippo Del Grande; Lorenzo Spaggiari Journal: Front Oncol Date: 2022-03-15 Impact factor: 6.244
Authors: Balázs Poros; Andrea Sabine Becker-Pennrich; Bastian Sabel; Hans Joachim Stemmler; Dietmar Wassilowsky; Thomas Weig; Ludwig Christian Hinske; Bernhard Zwissler; Jens Ricke; Dominik J Hoechter Journal: Obes Med Date: 2021-07-03
Authors: Chiara Giraudo; Giovanni Librizzi; Giulia Fichera; Raffaella Motta; Elisabetta Balestro; Fiorella Calabrese; Giovanni Carretta; Anna Maria Cattelan; Paolo Navalesi; Michela Pelloso; Mario Plebani; Federico Rea; Roberto Vettor; Andrea Vianello; Roberto Stramare Journal: PLoS One Date: 2021-06-17 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Oliver Guido Verhoek; Lisa Jungblut; Olivia Lauk; Christian Blüthgen; Isabelle Opitz; Thomas Frauenfelder; Katharina Martini Journal: Diagnostics (Basel) Date: 2022-01-03
Authors: Sung Woo Moon; Song Yee Kim; Ji Soo Choi; Ah Young Leem; Su Hwan Lee; Moo Suk Park; Young Sam Kim; Kyung Soo Chung Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2021-12-06 Impact factor: 4.379