Literature DB >> 29407892

The impact of myocardial bridge on coronary artery spasm and long-term clinical outcomes in patients without significant atherosclerotic stenosis.

Purumeh Nam1, Byoung Geol Choi2, Se Yeon Choi2, Jae Kyeong Byun2, Ahmed Mashaly3, Yoonjee Park3, Won Young Jang3, Woohyeun Kim3, Jah Yeon Choi3, Eun Jin Park3, Jin Oh Na3, Cheol Ung Choi3, Hong Euy Lim3, Eung Ju Kim3, Chang Gyu Park3, Hong Seog Seo3, Dong Joo Oh3, Seung-Woon Rha4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Myocardial bridge (MB) and coronary artery spasm (CAS) can induce a sustained chest pain, acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and even sudden cardiac death. The aim of this study is to evaluate the relationship between MB and CAS and its impact on long-term clinical outcomes.
METHODS: A total of 812 patients with MB without significant coronary artery disease (CAD), who underwent acetylcholine (ACH) provocation test, were enrolled. Significant CAS was defined as ≥70% temporary narrowing by ACH test, and MB was defined as the characteristic phasic systolic compression of the coronary artery with a decrease of more than 30% in diameter on the angiogram after intracoronary nitroglycerin infusion. To adjust baseline confounders, logistic regression analysis was performed. The primary endpoint was incidence of CAS, and secondary endpoints were major adverse cardiac events (MACE) and recurrent angina requiring repeat coronary angiography (CAG) at 5 years.
RESULTS: MB is closely implicated in a high incidence of CAS, spontaneous spasm, ischemic ECG change and chest pain during ACH provocation test. In addition, MB of various severity and reference vessel size was substantially implicated in CAS incidence, and severe MB was a strong risk factor of CAS. MB patients with CAS were shown to have a higher rate of recurrent angina compared with MB patients without CAS, up to a 5-year follow-up. However, there were no differences regarding the incidence of MACE.
CONCLUSIONS: Severe MB was associated with high incidence of CAS, and MB patients with CAS were likely to have a higher incidence of recurrent angina. Intensive medical therapy and close clinical follow-up are needed for better clinical outcomes in MB patients with CAS.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acetylcholine; Coronary artery spasm; Myocardial bridge

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29407892     DOI: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2018.01.026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Atherosclerosis        ISSN: 0021-9150            Impact factor:   5.162


  11 in total

Review 1.  Coronary Arterial Function and Disease in Women With No Obstructive Coronary Arteries.

Authors:  Harmony R Reynolds; C Noel Bairey Merz; Colin Berry; Rohit Samuel; Jacqueline Saw; Nathaniel R Smilowitz; Ana Carolina do A H de Souza; Robert Sykes; Viviany R Taqueti; Janet Wei
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  2022-02-17       Impact factor: 17.367

2.  Prognostic impact of nitrate therapy in patients with myocardial bridge and coexisting coronary artery spasm.

Authors:  Ji Bak Kim; Byoung Geol Choi; Seung-Woon Rha
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2022-09-13       Impact factor: 1.814

Review 3.  [CT Imaging Findings in Non-Atherosclerotic Coronary Artery Disease].

Authors:  Jongmin Park; Byunggeon Park; Eun-Ju Kang; Jongmin Lee
Journal:  Taehan Yongsang Uihakhoe Chi       Date:  2022-01-21

4.  Coronary spasm: It's common, but it's still unsolved.

Authors:  Hiroki Teragawa; Chikage Oshita; Tomohiro Ueda
Journal:  World J Cardiol       Date:  2018-11-26

Review 5.  The Myocardial Bridge: Potential Influences on the Coronary Artery Vasculature.

Authors:  Hiroki Teragawa; Chikage Oshita; Tomohiro Ueda
Journal:  Clin Med Insights Cardiol       Date:  2019-05-01

6.  A comprehensive clinical diagnostic score system for prediction of coronary artery spasm in patients with acute chest pain.

Authors:  Yaowang Lin; Haiyan Qin; Ruimian Chen; Qiyun Liu; Huadong Liu; Shaohong Dong
Journal:  Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc       Date:  2019-02-23

7.  Association of Major Adverse Cardiac Events up to 5 Years in Patients With Chest Pain Without Significant Coronary Artery Disease in the Korean Population.

Authors:  Byoung Geol Choi; Seung-Woon Rha; Seong Gyu Yoon; Cheol Ung Choi; Min Woo Lee; Suhng Wook Kim
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2019-06-12       Impact factor: 5.501

8.  Myocardial bridge-related coronary heart disease: Independent influencing factors and their predicting value.

Authors:  Dong-Hui Zhao; Qian Fan; Jun-Xia Ning; Xin Wang; Jia-Yu Tian
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2019-08-06       Impact factor: 1.337

9.  The Significance of Recognizing Myocardial Bridge in the Coronary Spasm Diagnosis in Myocardial Infarction with Nonobstructive Coronary Arteries.

Authors:  Hiroki Teragawa; Chikage Oshita; Tomohiro Ueda
Journal:  Intern Med       Date:  2019-09-03       Impact factor: 1.271

10.  Impact of Myocardial Bridge on Life-Threatening Ventricular Arrhythmia in Patients With Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator.

Authors:  Kozo Okada; Kiyoshi Hibi; Yutaka Ogino; Nobuhiko Maejima; Shinnosuke Kikuchi; Hidekuni Kirigaya; Jin Kirigaya; Ryosuke Sato; Hidefumi Nakahashi; Yugo Minamimoto; Yuichiro Kimura; Eiichi Akiyama; Yasushi Matsuzawa; Noriaki Iwahashi; Masami Kosuge; Toshiaki Ebina; Kouichi Tamura; Kazuo Kimura
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2020-10-23       Impact factor: 5.501

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.