Literature DB >> 29407863

Biomechanics of a cemented short stem: Standard vs. line-to-line cementation techniques. A biomechanical in-vitro study involving six osteoporotic pairs of human cadaver femurs.

Karl Philipp Kutzner1, Tobias Freitag2, Ralf Bieger3, Heiko Reichel4, Joachim Pfeil5, Anita Ignatius6, Lutz Dürselen7.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Short-stem total hip arthroplasty (THA) potentially offers advantages compared to conventional THA, including sparing bone and soft tissue and being a facilitated and less traumatic implantation. However, the indication is limited to patients with sufficient bone quality. Cemented short-stem THA might provide an alternative to conventional cemented THA. To date, no cemented short stem is available on the market.
METHODS: In the present in vitro study, primary stability of a new cemented short stem was evaluated, comparing standard (undersized stem) versus line-to-line (same-sized stem) cementing techniques, using six pairs of human cadaver femurs. Primary stability, including reversible micromotion and irreversible migration, was assessed in a dynamic material-testing machine. Fracture load was tested and fracture pattern analyzed.
FINDINGS: Both cementation techniques (standard vs. line-to-line) displayed comparable results with respect to primary stability without any statistical differences (micromotion: 17.5 μm vs. 9.6 μm (p = 0.063); migration: 9.5 μm vs. 38.2 μm (p = 0.188)). Regarding fracture load, again, no difference was observed (3670 N vs. 3687 N (p = 0.063)). In all cases, proximal fractures of Vancouver type B3 occurred.
INTERPRETATION: The present in vitro study demonstrates that the line-to-line cementation technique, which is favourable regarding the philosophy of short stem THA, can be further pursued in the course of the development of a cemented short stem. Further investigations should address how well the cemented short stem compares to well-established cemented straight-stem designs.
Copyright © 2018 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomechanics; Cement-mantle thickness; Cemented total hip arthroplasty; French paradox; Micromotion; Migration; Optimys; Primary stability; Short stem

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29407863     DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2018.01.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)        ISSN: 0268-0033            Impact factor:   2.063


  2 in total

1.  Fourteen-year experience with short cemented stems in total hip replacement.

Authors:  Nicola Santori; Francesco Falez; Domenico Potestio; Francesco Saverio Santori
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-11-08       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Biomechanics of a cemented short stem: a comparative in vitro study regarding primary stability and maximum fracture load.

Authors:  Tobias Freitag; Karl Philipp Kutzner; Ralf Bieger; Heiko Reichel; Anita Ignatius; Lutz Dürselen
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2021-03-23       Impact factor: 3.067

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.