S Aubret1, L Merlini2, M Fessy3, J-L Besse3. 1. Service de chirurgie orthopédique et traumatologique, centre hospitalier Lyon-Sud, hospices Civils de Lyon, 69495 Pierre-Bénite cedex, France; Service de chirurgie orthopédique et traumatologique, université Clermont Auvergne, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, 63000 Clermont-Ferrand, France. Electronic address: sylvain.aubret@chu-clermontferrand.fr. 2. Service de chirurgie orthopédique et traumatologique, centre hospitalier Lyon-Sud, hospices Civils de Lyon, 69495 Pierre-Bénite cedex, France. 3. Laboratoire de biomécanique et mécanique des Chocs, IFSTTAR, LBMC UMR-T 9406, université Lyon 1, 69675 Bron cedex, France; Service de chirurgie orthopédique et traumatologique, centre hospitalier Lyon-Sud, hospices Civils de Lyon, 69495 Pierre-Bénite cedex, France.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: One of the reasons for revision of total ankle replacement (TAR) implants is loosening due to subchondral cysts. Reconstruction and fusion of the ankle is often the first choice for revision procedures due to the large bone defects, which are typically filled with autograft and/or allograft. Filling the defect with a trabecular metal tantalum implant is a potential alternative given the biomechanical properties of this component. HYPOTHESIS: Using tantalum as a spacer provides primary stability and contributes to fusion of the ankle joint after removal of failed TAR implants. METHODS: Eleven patients underwent arthrodesis an average of 6.9 years after TAR. The mean height of the bone defect was 32mm. It was filled with a specially designed quadrangular implant (Trabecular Metal™, Zimmer/Biomet) combined with an iliac crest graft. Ten patients underwent tibio-talo-calcaneal (TTC) arthrodesis fixed with an angled retrograde nail and one patient underwent talocrural arthrodesis fixed with two plates (anterolateral and anteromedial). The clinical, functional (AOFAS and SF36 scores) and radiological (plain X-rays and CT scan) outcomes were determined. RESULTS: At a mean follow-up of 19.3 months, the mean total AOFAS score was 56 (21-78) and the mean SF36 score was 60.5 (19-84). One patient was lost to follow-up and four patients still had pain. The tantalum implant was integrated in six patients. Five patients achieved fusion of the subtalar joint and 8 achieved fusion of the talocrural joint. Three patients required surgical revision. DISCUSSION: Our hypothesis was not confirmed. The clinical outcomes after more than 1 year of follow-up are disappointing, as was the large number of nonunion cases and the lack of tantalum integration. These technical failures can be explained by insufficient construct stability and/or insufficient implant porosity. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV (retrospective cohort study).
INTRODUCTION: One of the reasons for revision of total ankle replacement (TAR) implants is loosening due to subchondral cysts. Reconstruction and fusion of the ankle is often the first choice for revision procedures due to the large bone defects, which are typically filled with autograft and/or allograft. Filling the defect with a trabecular metal tantalum implant is a potential alternative given the biomechanical properties of this component. HYPOTHESIS: Using tantalum as a spacer provides primary stability and contributes to fusion of the ankle joint after removal of failed TAR implants. METHODS: Eleven patients underwent arthrodesis an average of 6.9 years after TAR. The mean height of the bone defect was 32mm. It was filled with a specially designed quadrangular implant (Trabecular Metal™, Zimmer/Biomet) combined with an iliac crest graft. Ten patients underwent tibio-talo-calcaneal (TTC) arthrodesis fixed with an angled retrograde nail and one patient underwent talocrural arthrodesis fixed with two plates (anterolateral and anteromedial). The clinical, functional (AOFAS and SF36 scores) and radiological (plain X-rays and CT scan) outcomes were determined. RESULTS: At a mean follow-up of 19.3 months, the mean total AOFAS score was 56 (21-78) and the mean SF36 score was 60.5 (19-84). One patient was lost to follow-up and four patients still had pain. The tantalum implant was integrated in six patients. Five patients achieved fusion of the subtalar joint and 8 achieved fusion of the talocrural joint. Three patients required surgical revision. DISCUSSION: Our hypothesis was not confirmed. The clinical outcomes after more than 1 year of follow-up are disappointing, as was the large number of nonunion cases and the lack of tantalum integration. These technical failures can be explained by insufficient construct stability and/or insufficient implant porosity. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV (retrospective cohort study).