Literature DB >> 29406835

Pragmatically Applied Cervical and Thoracic Nonthrust Manipulation Versus Thrust Manipulation for Patients With Mechanical Neck Pain: A Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial.

David Griswold, Ken Learman, Morey J Kolber, Bryan O'Halloran, Joshua A Cleland.   

Abstract

Study Design Randomized clinical trial. Background The comparative effectiveness between nonthrust manipulation (NTM) and thrust manipulation (TM) for mechanical neck pain has been investigated, with inconsistent results. Objective To compare the clinical effectiveness of concordant cervical and thoracic NTM and TM for patients with mechanical neck pain. Methods The Neck Disability Index (NDI) was the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes included the Patient-Specific Functional Scale (PSFS), numeric pain-rating scale (NPRS), deep cervical flexion endurance (DCF), global rating of change (GROC), number of visits, and duration of care. The covariate was clinical equipoise for intervention. Outcomes were collected at baseline, visit 2, and discharge. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either NTM or TM directed at the cervical and thoracic spines. Techniques and dosages were selected pragmatically and applied to the most symptomatic level. Two-way mixed-model analyses of covariance were used to assess clinical outcomes at 3 time points. Analyses of covariance were used to assess between-group differences for the GROC, number of visits, and duration of care at discharge. Results One hundred three patients were included in the analyses (NTM, n = 55 and TM, n = 48). The between-group analyses revealed no differences in outcomes on the NDI (P = .67), PSFS (P = .26), NPRS (P = .25), DCF (P = .98), GROC (P = .77), number of visits (P = .21), and duration of care (P = .61) for patients with mechanical neck pain who received either NTM or TM. Conclusion NTM and TM produce equivalent outcomes for patients with mechanical neck pain. The trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02619500). Level of Evidence Therapy, level 1b. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2018;48(3):137-145. Epub 6 Feb 2018. doi:10.2519/jospt.2018.7738.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cervical spine; manual therapy; neck pain; nonthrust; thoracic spine; thrust manipulation

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29406835     DOI: 10.2519/jospt.2018.7738

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther        ISSN: 0190-6011            Impact factor:   4.751


  8 in total

1.  The effect of spinal manipulative therapy on heart rate variability and pain in patients with chronic neck pain: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Anders Galaasen Bakken; Iben Axén; Andreas Eklund; Søren O'Neill
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2019-10-12       Impact factor: 2.279

Review 2.  The Effect of High Velocity Low Amplitude Cervical Manipulations on the Musculoskeletal System: Literature Review.

Authors:  Andrea Giacalone; Massimiliano Febbi; Fabrizio Magnifica; Enzo Ruberti
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2020-04-15

Review 3.  Visceral Origin: An Underestimated Source of Neck Pain. A Systematic Scoping Review.

Authors:  Ángel Oliva-Pascual-Vaca; Carlos González-González; Jesús Oliva-Pascual-Vaca; Fernando Piña-Pozo; Alejandro Ferragut-Garcías; Juan Carlos Fernández-Domínguez; Alberto Marcos Heredia-Rizo
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2019-11-12

4.  Pragmatic trials of pain therapies: a systematic review of methods.

Authors:  David Hohenschurz-Schmidt; Bethea A Kleykamp; Jerry Draper-Rodi; Jan Vollert; Jessica Chan; McKenzie Ferguson; Ewan McNicol; Jules Phalip; Scott R Evans; Dennis C Turk; Robert H Dworkin; Andrew S C Rice
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2022-01-01       Impact factor: 6.961

Review 5.  Clinical Effectiveness and Efficacy of Chiropractic Spinal Manipulation for Spine Pain.

Authors:  Carlos Gevers-Montoro; Benjamin Provencher; Martin Descarreaux; Arantxa Ortega de Mues; Mathieu Piché
Journal:  Front Pain Res (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-10-25

6.  Approaches to cervical spine mobilization for neck pain: a pilot randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Claire Lagoutaris; Justin Sullivan; Michelle Hancock; Andrew M Leaver
Journal:  Chiropr Man Therap       Date:  2020-11-18

7.  Immediate effects of cervicothoracic junction mobilization versus thoracic manipulation on the range of motion and pain in mechanical neck pain with cervicothoracic junction dysfunction: a pilot randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Shriya Joshi; Ganesh Balthillaya; Y V Raghava Neelapala
Journal:  Chiropr Man Therap       Date:  2020-08-07

8.  Clinical outcomes of maitland mobilization in patients with Myofascial Chronic Neck Pain: A randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Maryam Shabbir; Naveed Arshad; Anam Naz; Nadia Saleem
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2021 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.088

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.