N C S Terblanche1, C Middleton2, D L Choi-Lundberg3, M Skinner4. 1. Department of Anaesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, Royal Hobart Hospital, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia; School of Medicine, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia; Menzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia. Electronic address: nico.terblanche@ths.tas.gov.au. 2. Department of Gastroenterology, Royal Hobart Hospital, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia. 3. School of Medicine, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia. 4. Department of Anaesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, Royal Hobart Hospital, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia; School of Medicine, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Significant cardiorespiratory events are frequent in patients undergoing gastrointestinal endoscopy. Central to the occurrence of respiratory events is an unsecured airway. This study sought to determine the efficacy of a new laryngeal mask airway, the LMA®GastroTM Airway (Teleflex Medical, Athlone, Ireland), in patients undergoing upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. New design features include a dedicated channel for oesophageal intubation and separate channel with terminal cuff for lung ventilation. METHODS: In a prospective, open label, observational study, 292 ASA physical status classification 1 and 2 patients at low risk of pulmonary aspiration undergoing upper gastrointestinal endoscopy received i.v. propofol anaesthesia and standardized insertion of the LMA®GastroTM Airway. Endoscopy outcomes included insertion success, first attempt success, and ease of endoscope insertion. LMA®GastroTM Airway outcomes included insertion success, first attempt success, ease of insertion, lowest oxygen saturation, airway compromise, laryngospasm, bloodstained device, and sore throat. RESULTS: Per protocol analysis (n=290), the endoscopy success rate amongst the cohort with successful LMA®GastroTM Airway insertion was 99% [95% confidence interval (CI): 98, 100]. LMA®GastroTM Airway insertion success rate (n=292) was 99% (95% CI: 98, 100). For endoscopy and LMA®GastroTM Airway insertion success, the lower limit of the 95% CIs was at least 98%, indicating LMA®GastroTM Airway efficacy. Median (inter-quartile range) lowest intraoperative oxygen saturation was 98% (98, 99). Only one serious adverse event occurred (re-admission for sore throat and inability to tolerate fluids) and was reported to the Tasmanian Health and Medical Human Research Ethics Committee. CONCLUSIONS: The LMA®GastroTM Airway appears effective for clinical use in upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ACTRN12616001464459.
BACKGROUND: Significant cardiorespiratory events are frequent in patients undergoing gastrointestinal endoscopy. Central to the occurrence of respiratory events is an unsecured airway. This study sought to determine the efficacy of a new laryngeal mask airway, the LMA®GastroTM Airway (Teleflex Medical, Athlone, Ireland), in patients undergoing upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. New design features include a dedicated channel for oesophageal intubation and separate channel with terminal cuff for lung ventilation. METHODS: In a prospective, open label, observational study, 292 ASA physical status classification 1 and 2 patients at low risk of pulmonary aspiration undergoing upper gastrointestinal endoscopy received i.v. propofol anaesthesia and standardized insertion of the LMA®GastroTM Airway. Endoscopy outcomes included insertion success, first attempt success, and ease of endoscope insertion. LMA®GastroTM Airway outcomes included insertion success, first attempt success, ease of insertion, lowest oxygen saturation, airway compromise, laryngospasm, bloodstained device, and sore throat. RESULTS: Per protocol analysis (n=290), the endoscopy success rate amongst the cohort with successful LMA®GastroTM Airway insertion was 99% [95% confidence interval (CI): 98, 100]. LMA®GastroTM Airway insertion success rate (n=292) was 99% (95% CI: 98, 100). For endoscopy and LMA®GastroTM Airway insertion success, the lower limit of the 95% CIs was at least 98%, indicating LMA®GastroTM Airway efficacy. Median (inter-quartile range) lowest intraoperative oxygen saturation was 98% (98, 99). Only one serious adverse event occurred (re-admission for sore throat and inability to tolerate fluids) and was reported to the Tasmanian Health and Medical Human Research Ethics Committee. CONCLUSIONS: The LMA®GastroTM Airway appears effective for clinical use in upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ACTRN12616001464459.
Authors: Mohammed Hakim; Jason Bryant; Renata Miketic; Kent Williams; Steven H Erdman; Shabana Z Shafy; Stephani S Kim; Joseph D Tobias Journal: Med Devices (Auckl) Date: 2020-09-21
Authors: Andre Tran; Venkatesan Thiruvenkatarajan; Medhat Wahba; John Currie; Anand Rajbhoj; Roelof van Wijk; Edward Teo; Mark Lorenzetti; Guy Ludbrook Journal: BMC Anesthesiol Date: 2020-05-13 Impact factor: 2.217
Authors: V Thiruvenkatarajan; M Lorenzetti; A Chung; C K Wong; J Currie; M Wahba; R M Van Wijk; M W Skinner; M Sorbello Journal: Dig Dis Sci Date: 2020-07-25 Impact factor: 3.199
Authors: André A J Van Zundert; Chandra M Kumar; Tom C R V Van Zundert; Stephen P Gatt; Jaideep J Pandit Journal: J Clin Monit Comput Date: 2020-06-15 Impact factor: 2.502