Context: Pain education is a fundamental part of a holistic approach to athlete injury management. Objective: To investigate the effect of pain neuroscience education (PNE) on sports therapy and rehabilitation students (1) knowledge of persistent pain, (2) attitudes toward athletes with persistent pain, and (3) clinical recommendations for athletes with persistent pain. Design: Parallel groups, single-blind randomized control trial. Setting: A university in the United Kingdom. Participants: Sixty-one undergraduate and postgraduate sports therapy and rehabilitation students. Interventions: The PNE session (intervention group) provided detailed information on the neuroscience of persistent pain, the modulating role of psychosocial factors on pain biology, and how this information could be used to inform clinical practice. The red flags (control group) session provided information on screeningpatients with persistent pain for serious/sinister pathologies. Each education session lasted 70 minutes. Outcome measures: (1) Knowledge-the Revised Pain Neurophysiology Questionnaire; (2) Attitudes-the Health Care Pain Attitudes and Impairment Relationship Scale; and (3) Clinical recommendations-an athlete case vignette. Results: Posteducation, the PNE group had a greater increase in pain neuroscience knowledge (mean difference 3.2; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 2.1 to 4.3; P < .01) and improved attitudes (mean difference -10.1; 95% CI, -16.6 to -3.6; P < .01). In addition, students in the PNE group were more likely to make appropriate clinical recommendations (odds ratio [OR]; 95% CI) regarding return-to-work (OR = 6.1; 95% CI, 1.1 to 32.3; P = .03), exercise (OR = 10.7; 95% CI, 2.6 to 43.7; P ≤ 01), and bed rest (OR = 4.3; 95% CI, 1.5 to 12.8; P = 01). Conclusion: A brief PNE session can, in the immediate term, increase sports therapy and rehabilitation students' knowledge of pain neuroscience, improve attitudes toward athletes with pain, and shift their clinical recommendations in line with current guidelines. Such changes could lead to enhanced rehabilitation for athletes with persistent pain.
RCT Entities:
Context:Pain education is a fundamental part of a holistic approach to athlete injury management. Objective: To investigate the effect of pain neuroscience education (PNE) on sports therapy and rehabilitation students (1) knowledge of persistent pain, (2) attitudes toward athletes with persistent pain, and (3) clinical recommendations for athletes with persistent pain. Design: Parallel groups, single-blind randomized control trial. Setting: A university in the United Kingdom. Participants: Sixty-one undergraduate and postgraduate sports therapy and rehabilitation students. Interventions: The PNE session (intervention group) provided detailed information on the neuroscience of persistent pain, the modulating role of psychosocial factors on pain biology, and how this information could be used to inform clinical practice. The red flags (control group) session provided information on screening patients with persistent pain for serious/sinister pathologies. Each education session lasted 70 minutes. Outcome measures: (1) Knowledge-the Revised Pain Neurophysiology Questionnaire; (2) Attitudes-the Health Care Pain Attitudes and Impairment Relationship Scale; and (3) Clinical recommendations-an athlete case vignette. Results: Posteducation, the PNE group had a greater increase in pain neuroscience knowledge (mean difference 3.2; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 2.1 to 4.3; P < .01) and improved attitudes (mean difference -10.1; 95% CI, -16.6 to -3.6; P < .01). In addition, students in the PNE group were more likely to make appropriate clinical recommendations (odds ratio [OR]; 95% CI) regarding return-to-work (OR = 6.1; 95% CI, 1.1 to 32.3; P = .03), exercise (OR = 10.7; 95% CI, 2.6 to 43.7; P ≤ 01), and bed rest (OR = 4.3; 95% CI, 1.5 to 12.8; P = 01). Conclusion: A brief PNE session can, in the immediate term, increase sports therapy and rehabilitation students' knowledge of pain neuroscience, improve attitudes toward athletes with pain, and shift their clinical recommendations in line with current guidelines. Such changes could lead to enhanced rehabilitation for athletes with persistent pain.
Entities:
Keywords:
athletic-therapy; chronic pain; low back pain
Authors: Jagjit Mankelow; Cormac G Ryan; Paul C Taylor; Maire-Brid Casey; Jenni Naisby; Kate Thompson; Joseph G McVeigh; Chris Seenan; Kay Cooper; Paul Hendrick; Donna Brown; William Gibson; Mervyn Travers; Norelee Kennedy; Cliona O'Riordan; Denis Martin Journal: BMC Med Educ Date: 2022-07-15 Impact factor: 3.263
Authors: Richard King; Victoria Robinson; Helene L Elliott-Button; James A Watson; Cormac G Ryan; Denis J Martin Journal: Pain Res Manag Date: 2018-09-12 Impact factor: 3.037