L Brazionis1, A Jenkins1,2, A Keech2, C Ryan2, A Brown3, J Boffa4, S Bursell2,5. 1. Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia. 2. National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia Clinical Trials Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia. 3. SAHMRI, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia. 4. Central Australian Aboriginal Congress, Alice Springs, Australia. 5. Telehealth Research Unit, University of Hawaii, HI, USA.
Abstract
AIM: To determine diabetic retinopathy prevalence and severity among remote Indigenous Australians. METHODS: A cross-sectional diabetic retinopathy screening study of Indigenous adults with Type 2 diabetes was conducted by locally trained non-ophthalmic retinal imagers in a remote Aboriginal community-controlled primary healthcare clinic in Central Australia and certified non-ophthalmic graders in a retinal grading centre in Melbourne, Australia. The main outcome measure was prevalence of any diabetic retinopathy and sight-threatening diabetic retinopathy. RESULTS: Among 301 participants (33% male), gradable image rates were 78.7% (n = 237) for diabetic retinopathy and 83.1% (n = 250) for diabetic macular oedema, and 77.7% (n = 234) were gradable for both diabetic retinopathy and diabetic macular oedema. For the gradable subset, the median (range) age was 48 (19-86) years and known diabetes duration 9.0 (0-24) years. The prevalence of diabetic retinopathy was 47% (n = 110) and for diabetic macular oedema it was 14.4% (n = 36). In the fully gradable imaging studies, sight-threatening diabetic retinopathy prevalence was 16.2% (n = 38): 14.1% (n = 33) for clinically significant macular oedema, 1.3% (n = 3) for proliferative diabetic retinopathy and 0.9% (n = 2) for both. Sight-threatening diabetic retinopathy had been treated in 78% of detected cases. CONCLUSIONS: A novel telemedicine diabetic retinopathy screening service detected a higher prevalence of 'any' diabetic retinopathy and sight-threatening diabetic retinopathy in a remote primary care setting than reported in earlier surveys among Indigenous and non-Indigenous populations. Whether the observed high prevalence of diabetic retinopathy was attributable to greater detection, increasing diabetic retinopathy prevalence, local factors, or a combination of these requires further investigation and, potentially, specific primary care guidelines for diabetic retinopathy management in remote Australia. Clinical Trials registration number: Australia and New Zealand Clinical Trials Register (ANZCTR): ACTRN 12616000370404.
AIM: To determine diabetic retinopathy prevalence and severity among remote Indigenous Australians. METHODS: A cross-sectional diabetic retinopathy screening study of Indigenous adults with Type 2 diabetes was conducted by locally trained non-ophthalmic retinal imagers in a remote Aboriginal community-controlled primary healthcare clinic in Central Australia and certified non-ophthalmic graders in a retinal grading centre in Melbourne, Australia. The main outcome measure was prevalence of any diabetic retinopathy and sight-threatening diabetic retinopathy. RESULTS: Among 301 participants (33% male), gradable image rates were 78.7% (n = 237) for diabetic retinopathy and 83.1% (n = 250) for diabetic macular oedema, and 77.7% (n = 234) were gradable for both diabetic retinopathy and diabetic macular oedema. For the gradable subset, the median (range) age was 48 (19-86) years and known diabetes duration 9.0 (0-24) years. The prevalence of diabetic retinopathy was 47% (n = 110) and for diabetic macular oedema it was 14.4% (n = 36). In the fully gradable imaging studies, sight-threatening diabetic retinopathy prevalence was 16.2% (n = 38): 14.1% (n = 33) for clinically significant macular oedema, 1.3% (n = 3) for proliferative diabetic retinopathy and 0.9% (n = 2) for both. Sight-threatening diabetic retinopathy had been treated in 78% of detected cases. CONCLUSIONS: A novel telemedicine diabetic retinopathy screening service detected a higher prevalence of 'any' diabetic retinopathy and sight-threatening diabetic retinopathy in a remote primary care setting than reported in earlier surveys among Indigenous and non-Indigenous populations. Whether the observed high prevalence of diabetic retinopathy was attributable to greater detection, increasing diabetic retinopathy prevalence, local factors, or a combination of these requires further investigation and, potentially, specific primary care guidelines for diabetic retinopathy management in remote Australia. Clinical Trials registration number: Australia and New Zealand Clinical Trials Register (ANZCTR): ACTRN 12616000370404.
Authors: Hannah Beks; Marley J Binder; Constance Kourbelis; Geraldine Ewing; James Charles; Yin Paradies; Robyn A Clark; Vincent L Versace Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2019-08-14 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Helen Burn; Lisa Hamm; Joanna Black; Anthea Burnett; Matire Harwood; Matthew J Burton; Jennifer R Evans; Jacqueline Ramke Journal: BMJ Glob Health Date: 2021-03
Authors: Penny Allen; Belinda Jessup; Santosh Khanal; Victoria Baker-Smith; Kehinde Obamiro; Tony Barnett Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-11-29 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Kehinde Obamiro; Belinda Jessup; Penny Allen; Victoria Baker-Smith; Santosh Khanal; Tony Barnett Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-07-14 Impact factor: 4.614
Authors: Laima Brazionis; Anthony Keech; Christopher Ryan; Alex Brown; David O'Neal; John Boffa; Sven-Erik Bursell; Alicia Jenkins Journal: BMJ Open Ophthalmol Date: 2021-07-01