Literature DB >> 29405206

The potential of 3D printing in urological research and patient care.

Marc Colaco1, Daniel A Igel2, Anthony Atala1,3.   

Abstract

3D printing is an evolving technology that enables the creation of unique organic and inorganic structures with high precision. In urology, the technology has demonstrated potential uses in both patient and clinician education as well as in clinical practice. The four major techniques used for 3D printing are inkjet printing, extrusion printing, laser sintering, and stereolithography. Each of these techniques can be applied to the production of models for education and surgical planning, prosthetic construction, and tissue bioengineering. Bioengineering is potentially the most important application of 3D printing, as the ability to produce functional organic constructs might, in the future, enable urologists to replicate and replace abnormal tissues with neo-organs, improving patient survival and quality of life.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29405206     DOI: 10.1038/nrurol.2018.6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Rev Urol        ISSN: 1759-4812            Impact factor:   14.432


  45 in total

1.  Viability and electrophysiology of neural cell structures generated by the inkjet printing method.

Authors:  Tao Xu; Cassie A Gregory; Peter Molnar; Xiaofeng Cui; Sahil Jalota; Sarit B Bhaduri; Thomas Boland
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2006-03-03       Impact factor: 12.479

2.  Effects of dispensing pressure and nozzle diameter on cell survival from solid freeform fabrication-based direct cell writing.

Authors:  Robert Chang; Jae Nam; Wei Sun
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 3.845

3.  Directed three-dimensional patterning of self-assembled peptide fibrils.

Authors:  Valentina Dinca; Emmanouil Kasotakis; Julien Catherine; Areti Mourka; Anthi Ranella; Aleksandr Ovsianikov; Boris N Chichkov; Maria Farsari; Anna Mitraki; Costas Fotakis
Journal:  Nano Lett       Date:  2007-12-23       Impact factor: 11.189

4.  3D bioprinting of tissues and organs.

Authors:  Sean V Murphy; Anthony Atala
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 54.908

5.  Computer-aided manufacture of individual endoprostheses. Preliminary communication.

Authors:  G Aldinger; A Fischer; B Kurtz
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  1983

6.  Individualized Physical 3-dimensional Kidney Tumor Models Constructed From 3-dimensional Printers Result in Improved Trainee Anatomic Understanding.

Authors:  Margaret Knoedler; Allison H Feibus; Andrew Lange; Michael M Maddox; Elisa Ledet; Raju Thomas; Jonathan L Silberstein
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 2.649

7.  3D bioprinting of urethra with PCL/PLCL blend and dual autologous cells in fibrin hydrogel: An in vitro evaluation of biomimetic mechanical property and cell growth environment.

Authors:  Kaile Zhang; Qiang Fu; James Yoo; Xiangxian Chen; Prafulla Chandra; Xiumei Mo; Lujie Song; Anthony Atala; Weixin Zhao
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2016-12-08       Impact factor: 8.947

8.  Use of rapid prototyping in prosthetic auricular restoration.

Authors:  Gursel Turgut; Bulent Sacak; Kazim Kiran; Lutfu Bas
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 1.046

9.  Three-dimensional printing surgical instruments: are we there yet?

Authors:  Timothy M Rankin; Nicholas A Giovinco; Daniel J Cucher; George Watts; Bonnie Hurwitz; David G Armstrong
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2014-02-19       Impact factor: 2.192

10.  Possibilities of Preoperative Medical Models Made by 3D Printing or Additive Manufacturing.

Authors:  Mika Salmi
Journal:  J Med Eng       Date:  2016-06-28
View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  [Imaging in individualized uro-oncology].

Authors:  J Bründl; J Breyer; M Burger
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 2.  Three-Dimensional Physical Model in Urologic Cancer.

Authors:  Yu Xie; Guanlin Wu; Yu Liang; Gang Fan
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-05-25

Review 3.  Towards clinical application of tissue engineering for erectile penile regeneration.

Authors:  Tom W Andrew; Muholan Kanapathy; Log Murugesan; Asif Muneer; Deepak Kalaskar; Anthony Atala
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2019-10-24       Impact factor: 14.432

4.  Three-dimensional printing versus conventional machining in the creation of a meatal urethral dilator: development and mechanical testing.

Authors:  Michael Y Chen; Jacob Skewes; Ryan Daley; Maria A Woodruff; Nicholas J Rukin
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 2.819

Review 5.  Review of the effect of 3D medical printing and virtual reality on urology training with ‘MedTRain3DModsim’ Erasmus + European Union Project

Authors:  İlkan Tatar; Emre Huri; İlker Selçuk; Young Lee Moon; Alberto Paoluzzi; Andreas Skolarikos
Journal:  Turk J Med Sci       Date:  2019-10-24       Impact factor: 0.973

6.  3D printing in orthopaedic surgery: a scoping review of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Ronald Man Yeung Wong; Pui Yan Wong; Chaoran Liu; Yik Lok Chung; Kwok Chuen Wong; Chi Yin Tso; Simon Kwoon-Ho Chow; Wing-Hoi Cheung; Patrick Shu-Hang Yung; Chun Sing Chui; Sheung Wai Law
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2021-12       Impact factor: 5.853

Review 7.  Anatomical Engineering and 3D Printing for Surgery and Medical Devices: International Review and Future Exponential Innovations.

Authors:  José Cornejo; Jorge A Cornejo-Aguilar; Mariela Vargas; Carlos G Helguero; Rafhael Milanezi de Andrade; Sebastian Torres-Montoya; Javier Asensio-Salazar; Alvaro Rivero Calle; Jaime Martínez Santos; Aaron Damon; Alfredo Quiñones-Hinojosa; Miguel D Quintero-Consuegra; Juan Pablo Umaña; Sebastian Gallo-Bernal; Manolo Briceño; Paolo Tripodi; Raul Sebastian; Paul Perales-Villarroel; Gabriel De la Cruz-Ku; Travis Mckenzie; Victor Sebastian Arruarana; Jiakai Ji; Laura Zuluaga; Daniela A Haehn; Albit Paoli; Jordan C Villa; Roxana Martinez; Cristians Gonzalez; Rafael J Grossmann; Gabriel Escalona; Ilaria Cinelli; Thais Russomano
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2022-03-24       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 8.  Trinity of Three-Dimensional (3D) Scaffold, Vibration, and 3D Printing on Cell Culture Application: A Systematic Review and Indicating Future Direction.

Authors:  Haobo Yuan; Ke Xing; Hung-Yao Hsu
Journal:  Bioengineering (Basel)       Date:  2018-07-23
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.