Literature DB >> 29405083

Cervical cancer - does the morphological subtype affect survival rates?

Marta Emmett1, Carolynn Gildea1, Andrew Nordin2, Lynn Hirschowitz3, Jason Poole1.   

Abstract

A retrospective population-based observational study using cancer registration data of women diagnosed with invasive cervical cancer between 2006 and 2010, in England, was carried out to explore how different morphological subtypes affect survival rates. Age-standardised net survival rates by morphological subtype are presented alongside with excess mortality modelling accounting for the impact of demographic, diagnostic and tumour factors. The three main morphological subtypes (squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), adenocarcinoma and adenosquamous carcinoma) have similar one-year net survival rates of approximately 85%. After adjusting for other important determinants of survival, there were no differences at five-years amongst the three main morphological subtypes, with unadjusted survival rates of 55-65%. As expected, women presenting with neuroendocrine tumours had a much poorer outcome than other epithelial cervical malignancies, with 1-year survival of up to 55%, five-year survival of 34% and excess mortality rates compared to SCC varying between 1.9 and 5.9. Impact Statement What is already known on this subject: This is the first study on survival by cervical cancer morphological subtype using national cancer data. What the results of this study add: This study uses excess mortality modelling to investigate the effects of the morphological subtypes whilst adjusting the other factors that affect cervical cancer survival such as stage, age and grade. What the implications are of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research: It is known that cervical neuroendocrine tumours have a poor prognosis and this is confirmed by this study. Squamous cell carcinomas (SCC), adenocarcinomas (AC) and adenosquamous carcinomas (ASC) have the highest net survival and when accounting for other factors there are no differences amongst these morphological subtypes in terms of survival.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cervical cancer; excess mortality; morphology; net survival

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29405083     DOI: 10.1080/01443615.2017.1379062

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol        ISSN: 0144-3615            Impact factor:   1.246


  4 in total

1.  To what extent do age, stage and treatment influence survival after invasive cervical cancer: a French population-based study.

Authors:  Zoéwendtalé Cyrille Compaoré; Elisabeth Monnet; Aurélie Gérazime; Florence Molinié; Anne-Valérie Guizard; Patricia Delafosse; Tienhan Sandrine Dabakuyo-Yonli; Gaëlle Coureau; Karima Hammas; Sandrine Plouvier; Simona Bara; Gautier Défossez; Bénédicte Lapôtre-Ledoux; Laetitia Daubisse-Marliac; Tania d'Almeida; Guy Launoy; Laura Mansi; Brigitte Trétarre; Anne-Sophie Woronoff
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2022-01-26       Impact factor: 2.506

2.  Poorer prognosis of ovarian squamous cell carcinoma than serous carcinoma: a propensity score matching analysis based on the SEER database.

Authors:  Cheng Zhang; Tai Ma
Journal:  J Ovarian Res       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 4.234

Review 3.  Anti-tumor activities of probiotics in cervical cancer.

Authors:  Moghaddaseh Jahanshahi; Parisa Maleki Dana; Bita Badehnoosh; Zatollah Asemi; Jamal Hallajzadeh; Mohammad Ali Mansournia; Bahman Yousefi; Bahram Moazzami; Shahla Chaichian
Journal:  J Ovarian Res       Date:  2020-06-11       Impact factor: 4.234

4.  Impact of neuroendocrine morphology on cancer outcomes and stage at diagnosis: a UK nationwide cohort study 2013-2015.

Authors:  Tracey S E Genus; Catherine Bouvier; Kwok F Wong; Rajaventhan Srirajaskanthan; Brian A Rous; Denis C Talbot; Juan W Valle; Mohid Khan; Neil Pearce; Mona Elshafie; Nicholas S Reed; Eileen Morgan; Andrew Deas; Ceri White; Dyfed Huws; John Ramage
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2019-10-25       Impact factor: 7.640

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.