Literature DB >> 29404850

MABAL: a Novel Deep-Learning Architecture for Machine-Assisted Bone Age Labeling.

Simukayi Mutasa1, Peter D Chang2, Carrie Ruzal-Shapiro2, Rama Ayyala2.   

Abstract

Bone age assessment (BAA) is a commonly performed diagnostic study in pediatric radiology to assess skeletal maturity. The most commonly utilized method for assessment of BAA is the Greulich and Pyle method (Pediatr Radiol 46.9:1269-1274, 2016; Arch Dis Child 81.2:172-173, 1999) atlas. The evaluation of BAA can be a tedious and time-consuming process for the radiologist. As such, several computer-assisted detection/diagnosis (CAD) methods have been proposed for automation of BAA. Classical CAD tools have traditionally relied on hard-coded algorithmic features for BAA which suffer from a variety of drawbacks. Recently, the advent and proliferation of convolutional neural networks (CNNs) has shown promise in a variety of medical imaging applications. There have been at least two published applications of using deep learning for evaluation of bone age (Med Image Anal 36:41-51, 2017; JDI 1-5, 2017). However, current implementations are limited by a combination of both architecture design and relatively small datasets. The purpose of this study is to demonstrate the benefits of a customized neural network algorithm carefully calibrated to the evaluation of bone age utilizing a relatively large institutional dataset. In doing so, this study will aim to show that advanced architectures can be successfully trained from scratch in the medical imaging domain and can generate results that outperform any existing proposed algorithm. The training data consisted of 10,289 images of different skeletal age examinations, 8909 from the hospital Picture Archiving and Communication System at our institution and 1383 from the public Digital Hand Atlas Database. The data was separated into four cohorts, one each for male and female children above the age of 8, and one each for male and female children below the age of 10. The testing set consisted of 20 radiographs of each 1-year-age cohort from 0 to 1 years to 14-15+ years, half male and half female. The testing set included left-hand radiographs done for bone age assessment, trauma evaluation without significant findings, and skeletal surveys. A 14 hidden layer-customized neural network was designed for this study. The network included several state of the art techniques including residual-style connections, inception layers, and spatial transformer layers. Data augmentation was applied to the network inputs to prevent overfitting. A linear regression output was utilized. Mean square error was used as the network loss function and mean absolute error (MAE) was utilized as the primary performance metric. MAE accuracies on the validation and test sets for young females were 0.654 and 0.561 respectively. For older females, validation and test accuracies were 0.662 and 0.497 respectively. For young males, validation and test accuracies were 0.649 and 0.585 respectively. Finally, for older males, validation and test set accuracies were 0.581 and 0.501 respectively. The female cohorts were trained for 900 epochs each and the male cohorts were trained for 600 epochs. An eightfold cross-validation set was employed for hyperparameter tuning. Test error was obtained after training on a full data set with the selected hyperparameters. Using our proposed customized neural network architecture on our large available data, we achieved an aggregate validation and test set mean absolute errors of 0.637 and 0.536 respectively. To date, this is the best published performance on utilizing deep learning for bone age assessment. Our results support our initial hypothesis that customized, purpose-built neural networks provide improved performance over networks derived from pre-trained imaging data sets. We build on that initial work by showing that the addition of state-of-the-art techniques such as residual connections and inception architecture further improves prediction accuracy. This is important because the current assumption for use of residual and/or inception architectures is that a large pre-trained network is required for successful implementation given the relatively small datasets in medical imaging. Instead we show that a small, customized architecture incorporating advanced CNN strategies can indeed be trained from scratch, yielding significant improvements in algorithm accuracy. It should be noted that for all four cohorts, testing error outperformed validation error. One reason for this is that our ground truth for our test set was obtained by averaging two pediatric radiologist reads compared to our training data for which only a single read was used. This suggests that despite relatively noisy training data, the algorithm could successfully model the variation between observers and generate estimates that are close to the expected ground truth.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Convolutional neural networks; Deep learning; Endocrinology; Machine learning; Pediatric radiology; Radiology

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29404850      PMCID: PMC6113150          DOI: 10.1007/s10278-018-0053-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Digit Imaging        ISSN: 0897-1889            Impact factor:   4.056


  13 in total

1.  Bone age assessment: a large scale comparison of the Greulich and Pyle, and Tanner and Whitehouse (TW2) methods.

Authors:  R K Bull; P D Edwards; P M Kemp; S Fry; I A Hughes
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 3.791

2.  Multi-scale Convolutional Neural Networks for Lung Nodule Classification.

Authors:  Wei Shen; Mu Zhou; Feng Yang; Caiyun Yang; Jie Tian
Journal:  Inf Process Med Imaging       Date:  2015

3.  Deep learning for automated skeletal bone age assessment in X-ray images.

Authors:  C Spampinato; S Palazzo; D Giordano; M Aldinucci; R Leonardi
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2016-10-29       Impact factor: 8.545

4.  Lung Pattern Classification for Interstitial Lung Diseases Using a Deep Convolutional Neural Network.

Authors:  Marios Anthimopoulos; Stergios Christodoulidis; Lukas Ebner; Andreas Christe; Stavroula Mougiakakou
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2016-02-29       Impact factor: 10.048

5.  Large scale deep learning for computer aided detection of mammographic lesions.

Authors:  Thijs Kooi; Geert Litjens; Bram van Ginneken; Albert Gubern-Mérida; Clara I Sánchez; Ritse Mann; Ard den Heeten; Nico Karssemeijer
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2016-08-02       Impact factor: 8.545

6.  A multi-resolution approach for spinal metastasis detection using deep Siamese neural networks.

Authors:  Juan Wang; Zhiyuan Fang; Ning Lang; Huishu Yuan; Min-Ying Su; Pierre Baldi
Journal:  Comput Biol Med       Date:  2017-03-27       Impact factor: 4.589

7.  Bone age assessment practices in infants and older children among Society for Pediatric Radiology members.

Authors:  Micheál A Breen; Andy Tsai; Aymeric Stamm; Paul K Kleinman
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2016-05-12

8.  Digital hand atlas and web-based bone age assessment: system design and implementation.

Authors:  F Cao; H K Huang; E Pietka; V Gilsanz
Journal:  Comput Med Imaging Graph       Date:  2000 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.790

9.  Validation and reference values of automated bone age determination for four ethnicities.

Authors:  Hans Henrik Thodberg; Lars Sävendahl
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2010-08-06       Impact factor: 3.173

10.  Bone age in children of diverse ethnicity.

Authors:  F K Ontell; M Ivanovic; D S Ablin; T W Barlow
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 3.959

View more
  13 in total

1.  Forensic age estimation for pelvic X-ray images using deep learning.

Authors:  Yuan Li; Zhizhong Huang; Xiaoai Dong; Weibo Liang; Hui Xue; Lin Zhang; Yi Zhang; Zhenhua Deng
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-11-06       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Bone age determination using only the index finger: a novel approach using a convolutional neural network compared with human radiologists.

Authors:  Nakul E Reddy; Jesse C Rayan; Ananth V Annapragada; Nadia F Mahmood; Alan E Scheslinger; Wei Zhang; J Herman Kan
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2019-12-20

3.  Development of a multi-stage model for intelligent and quantitative appraising of skeletal maturity using cervical vertebras cone-beam CT images of Chinese girls.

Authors:  Lizhe Xie; Wen Tang; Iman Izadikhah; Zhenqi Zhao; Yang Zhao; Hu Li; Bin Yan
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2022-01-04       Impact factor: 2.924

Review 4.  Data Science for Child Health.

Authors:  Tellen D Bennett; Tiffany J Callahan; James A Feinstein; Debashis Ghosh; Saquib A Lakhani; Michael C Spaeder; Stanley J Szefler; Michael G Kahn
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  2019-01-25       Impact factor: 4.406

5.  DeepLiverNet: a deep transfer learning model for classifying liver stiffness using clinical and T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging data in children and young adults.

Authors:  Hailong Li; Lili He; Jonathan A Dudley; Thomas C Maloney; Elanchezhian Somasundaram; Samuel L Brady; Nehal A Parikh; Jonathan R Dillman
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2020-10-13

Review 6.  Artificial intelligence in paediatric radiology: Future opportunities.

Authors:  Natasha Davendralingam; Neil J Sebire; Owen J Arthurs; Susan C Shelmerdine
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2020-09-17       Impact factor: 3.039

7.  Rethinking Greulich and Pyle: A Deep Learning Approach to Pediatric Bone Age Assessment Using Pediatric Trauma Hand Radiographs.

Authors:  Ian Pan; Grayson L Baird; Simukayi Mutasa; Derek Merck; Carrie Ruzal-Shapiro; David W Swenson; Rama S Ayyala
Journal:  Radiol Artif Intell       Date:  2020-07-29

8.  Intelligent Bone Age Assessment: An Automated System to Detect a Bone Growth Problem Using Convolutional Neural Networks with Attention Mechanism.

Authors:  Mohd Asyraf Zulkifley; Nur Ayuni Mohamed; Siti Raihanah Abdani; Nor Azwan Mohamed Kamari; Asraf Mohamed Moubark; Ahmad Asrul Ibrahim
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-24

9.  A Novel Shorthand Approach to Knee Bone Age Using MRI: A Validation and Reliability Study.

Authors:  Blake C Meza; Scott M LaValva; Julien T Aoyama; Christopher J DeFrancesco; Brendan M Striano; James L Carey; Jie C Nguyen; Theodore J Ganley
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2021-08-11

10.  The RSNA Pediatric Bone Age Machine Learning Challenge.

Authors:  Safwan S Halabi; Luciano M Prevedello; Jayashree Kalpathy-Cramer; Artem B Mamonov; Alexander Bilbily; Mark Cicero; Ian Pan; Lucas Araújo Pereira; Rafael Teixeira Sousa; Nitamar Abdala; Felipe Campos Kitamura; Hans H Thodberg; Leon Chen; George Shih; Katherine Andriole; Marc D Kohli; Bradley J Erickson; Adam E Flanders
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2018-11-27       Impact factor: 29.146

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.