| Literature DB >> 29404201 |
Nikolett Csizmár1, Sándor Mihók1, András Jávor1, Szilvia Kusza1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The Hungarian draft is a horse breed with a recent mixed ancestry created in the 1920s by crossing local mares with draught horses imported from France and Belgium. The interest in its conservation and characterization has increased over the last few years. The aim of this work is to contribute to the characterization of the endangered Hungarian heavy draft horse populations in order to obtain useful information to implement conservation strategies for these genetic stocks.Entities:
Keywords: D-loop region; Equus caballus; Genetic diversity; Hungarian draft horse; mtDNA
Year: 2018 PMID: 29404201 PMCID: PMC5797449 DOI: 10.7717/peerj.4198
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PeerJ ISSN: 2167-8359 Impact factor: 2.984
Figure 1A maximum likelihood tree representing the phylogenetic relationships among 285 partial mtDNA D-loop horse sequences, including haplotypes of the Hungarian draft horses and the reference sequence X79547 (Xu & Arnason, 1994).
The phylogenetic tree was based on the Tamura-Nei model of evolution with gamma distribution of rates and 1,000 bootstrap replicates (Tamura & Nei, 1993). Different colors represent major haplogroups according to the following: A1 (light purple), A2 (dark blue), A5 (brown), A6 (light blue), B1 (yellow), B2 (turquoise), C1 (dark green), C2 (red), D2 (mustard yellow), D3 (dark purple), E (black), F1 (grey), F2 (light green), G (orange). The red square represents the reference sequence.
Figure 2Reduced-Median-Joining network depicting relationships between horse haplotypes.
Included are sequences of the 285 Hungarian draft individuals analysed in this study, plus sequences of European breeds available in the Genbank database. Sectors are proportional to the frequency of each haplotype. Branch lengths are not proportional to the mutational steps, the unmarked places means one, while others marked near branches. In the following order, acronyms, breed names, and sample sizes-indicated by ‘()’-were as follows: MH, Hungarian draft, our samples (number of samples: 285); Rin, Rhineland Heavy draft (25); Nori, Noriker (10); Tat, Turkoman Akhal Teke (19); Ital, Italian heavy draught (27); Bre, Breton (58); Arb, Arabian (10); Fin, Finn horse (2); PP, Polish primitiv (3); HC, Hucul (10); Zem, Zemaitukai heavy type (7); Shi, Shire (10); Vlad, Vladimir draught horse (21); Cly, Clydesdale (17); Irn, Iranian (14); Tra, Trakehner (4); Csp, Caspian Pony (5); Ph, Polish heavy (3); Mrn, Maremmano (15); Pos, Posavina (20); Akt, Akhal teke (16); Shet, Shetland pony (12); Pur, Pura Raza Espanola (17); Hhv, Croatian heavy draft (11); Mur, Murinsulaner (8); Fell, Fell (2); Ic, Icelandic Horse (2); Nf, Norwegian Fjord (2); Rom, Romanian draft horse (1); Per, Percheron (3); Lhd, Lithuanian heavy drought (3); Old, Oldenburg (1); And, Andalusian (2); Sil, Silesian (1); Ital, Italian (3); Sc, Scottish Highland (2); Be, Belgian (13); Tho, Thoroughbred horse (1); Aph, American Paint horse (1); Han, Hanovarian (3); Wiel, Wielkopolski (3); Syr, Syrian (5); Gia, Giara horse (2); His, Holstein (2); Prze, Przewalskii (3); Got, Gotland (3); Sf, Suffolk Punch (1); West, Westfalian (1); Chin, Chincoteague pony (1); Cle, Cleveland bay horse (11); Sad, Saddlebred (1); Ex, Exmoor pony (1).
Figure 3Graphic representation of pairwise FST values for all population comparisons.
Significance level = 0.05. Graphic representation of different population relationships as described by FST computed between pairs of populations based on mtDNA datasets all of 212 base pairs. Shading reflects degree of divergence and corresponds to FST values indicated in legend (right).