Literature DB >> 29404116

Can a Computer-Based Prescription of Free Medication Increase Smoking Cessation Rates Efficiently?

Banu Salepci1, Ali Fidan1, Benan Çağlayan1, Elif Torun Parmaksız1, Nesrin Kıral1, Sevda Şener Cömert1, Gülten Aktin Güngör1, Egehan Salepci2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: In 2011, in the context of a research project, bupropion and varenicline were distributed to smoking cessation clinics by the Ministry of Health of Turkey to be prescribed free of charge by a computer-based system. In the present study, we compared smoking cessation rates between patients who were prescribed free medications during the period of the project and those who had to pay for their medication.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Six hundred four patients who applied during the project period were given either bupropion or varenicline, which were prescribed using an algorithm-based computer system. Three hundred sixteen patients who applied after that period were prescribed medicines deemed appropriate by the attending physician but had to pay for the medication on their own. Follow-up visits were arranged for one year. Carbon monoxide (CO) levels in the expired air were used as indicators of cessation.
RESULTS: A total of 537 patients began treatment, of which 438 (81.6%) applied during the first period (group 1) and 99 (18.4%) applied during the second period (group 2). The mean age and concomitant disease presence were higher in the second-period patients (p< 0.05). Advanced age, comorbidities, pathological findings in spirometry, and chest X-ray were also higher in those who paid for the cost of their treatment (p= 0.009, 0.001, 0.006, 0.001, respectively). Smoking cessation rates were found to be 14.8% and 27.3% after six months (p= 0.008) and 10.7% and 18.2% after one year (p= 0.059), respectively, for group 1 and group 2. Age, dependence score, cigarettes smoked (as pack-years), and percentage of patients who paid for the treatment were found to be significantly higher (p< 0.001, 0.021, 0.018, 0.001, respectively) for those who quit smoking at the end of six months. For the patients who quit smoking at the end of one year, age was found to be significantly higher (p= 0.008), and the number of males was higher, although the difference was not statistically significant (p= 0.05). When logistic regression analysis was applied, age, dependence score, and paid treatment were found to be independent variables (p= 0.002, 0.008, 0.012, respectively) for those who quit smoking at the end of six months. Only age was found to be an independent variable for those who quit smoking at the end of one year (p= 0.029).
CONCLUSION: More smokers could receive treatment by the distribution of free drugs. However, quitting rates at the end of six months were higher when patients had to pay for their treatment. On the other hand, quitting rates at the end of one year were not affected by whether the treatment was paid for or free of charge. The most important factor increasing quitting rates at the end of six months and one year was found to be advanced age.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Smoking cessation; smoking cessation policies; treatment efficiency

Year:  2015        PMID: 29404116      PMCID: PMC5792108          DOI: 10.5578/ttj.17.1.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Turk Thorac J        ISSN: 2148-7197


  21 in total

1.  State medicaid coverage for tobacco-dependence treatments--United States, 1998 and 2000.

Authors: 
Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep       Date:  2001-11-09       Impact factor: 17.586

2.  A harmful aid to stopping smoking.

Authors:  E Groman; G Bernhard; D Blauensteiner; U Kunze
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1999-02-06       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 3.  Supporting smoking cessation.

Authors:  Nicholas A Zwar; Colin P Mendelsohn; Robyn L Richmond
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2014-01-14

Review 4.  Priorities among effective clinical preventive services: results of a systematic review and analysis.

Authors:  Michael V Maciosek; Ashley B Coffield; Nichol M Edwards; Thomas J Flottemesch; Michael J Goodman; Leif I Solberg
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 5.043

5.  Australian smokers increasingly use help to quit, but number of attempts remains stable: findings from the International Tobacco Control Study 2002-09.

Authors:  Jae Cooper; Ron Borland; Hua-Hie Yong
Journal:  Aust N Z J Public Health       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 2.939

Review 6.  Healthcare financing systems for increasing the use of tobacco dependence treatment.

Authors:  J Kaper; E J Wagena; J L Severens; C P Van Schayck
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2005-01-25

7.  A combination of exhaled carbon monoxide (CO) measurement and the Fagerström Test for Nicotine Dependence (FTND) is recommended to complete information on smoking rates in population-based surveys.

Authors:  E Groman; P Bayer
Journal:  Soz Praventivmed       Date:  2000

Review 8.  A clinical practice guideline for treating tobacco use and dependence: A US Public Health Service report. The Tobacco Use and Dependence Clinical Practice Guideline Panel, Staff, and Consortium Representatives.

Authors: 
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2000-06-28       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 9.  Cost effectiveness analysis of smoking cessation interventions.

Authors:  James Shearer; Marian Shanahan
Journal:  Aust N Z J Public Health       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 2.939

10.  State medicaid coverage for tobacco-dependence treatments--United States, 1994-2002.

Authors: 
Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep       Date:  2004-01-30       Impact factor: 17.586

View more
  3 in total

1.  Providing Free Access to Smoking Cessation Medications: Does It Have an Impact on the Treatment Adherence and Success of Smoking Cessation?

Authors:  Olesya Aksel; Nevin Küçüktepe; Zafer Yaslıca; Okay Başak
Journal:  Turk Thorac J       Date:  2021-05

2.  Comparative assessment of outcomes of smoking cessation therapies and role of free medications in successful long-term abstinence.

Authors:  Bengu Saylan; Seyma Baslilar; Zafer Kartaloglu
Journal:  Tob Induc Dis       Date:  2021-06-15       Impact factor: 2.600

3.  How does reimbursement status affect smoking cessation interventions? A real-life experience from the Eastern Black Sea region of Turkey.

Authors:  Dilek Karadoğan; Özgür Önal; Yalçın Kanbay
Journal:  Tob Induc Dis       Date:  2019-01-22       Impact factor: 2.600

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.