Macrothelypteris torresiana is a fern species belonging to family Thelypteridaceae. The present study was conducted to evaluate hepatoprotective potential of ethanol extract from M. torresiana aerial parts (EEMTAP) and detect the polyphenolic compounds present in the extract using high performance thin layer chromatography (HPTLC). Hepatoprotective potential of EEMTAP were tested at doses of 300 and 600 mg/kg, per os (p.o.), on Wistar albino rats. The extract and silymarin treated animal groups showed significant decrease in activities of different biochemical parameters like serum glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase (SGOT), serum glutamate-pyruvate transaminase (SGPT), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), which were elevated by carbon tetrachloride (CCl4) intoxication. The levels of total bilirubin and total protein alongwith the liver weight were also restored to normalcy by EEMTAP and silymarin treatment. After CCl4 administration the level of hepatic antioxidant enzymes such as Glutathione (GSH) and Catalase (CAT) were decreased whereas the level of hepatic lipid peroxidation (LPO) was elevated. The level of these hepatic antioxidant enzymes were also brought to normalcy by EEMTAP and silymarin treatment. Histological studies supported the biochemical findings and treatment with EEMTAP at doses 300 and 600 mg/kg, p.o. was found to be effective in restoring CCl4-induced hepatotoxicity in rats. A simple HPTLC analysis was conducted for the detection of polyphenolic compounds in EEMTAP, and the result revealed the presence of caffeic acid as phenolic acid and quercetin as flavonoid. The proposed HPTLC method is simple, concise and provides a good resolution of caffeic acid and quercetin from other constituents present in EEMTAP.
Macrothelypteris torresiana is a fern species belonging to family Thelypteridaceae. The present study was conducted to evaluate hepatoprotective potential of ethanol extract from M. torresiana aerial parts (EEMTAP) and detect the polyphenolic compounds present in the extract using high performance thin layer chromatography (HPTLC). Hepatoprotective potential of EEMTAP were tested at doses of 300 and 600 mg/kg, per os (p.o.), on Wistar albino rats. The extract and silymarin treated animal groups showed significant decrease in activities of different biochemical parameters like serum glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase (SGOT), serum glutamate-pyruvate transaminase (SGPT), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), which were elevated by carbon tetrachloride (CCl4) intoxication. The levels of total bilirubin and total protein alongwith the liver weight were also restored to normalcy by EEMTAP and silymarin treatment. After CCl4 administration the level of hepatic antioxidant enzymes such as Glutathione (GSH) and Catalase (CAT) were decreased whereas the level of hepatic lipid peroxidation (LPO) was elevated. The level of these hepatic antioxidant enzymes were also brought to normalcy by EEMTAP and silymarin treatment. Histological studies supported the biochemical findings and treatment with EEMTAP at doses 300 and 600 mg/kg, p.o. was found to be effective in restoring CCl4-induced hepatotoxicity in rats. A simple HPTLC analysis was conducted for the detection of polyphenolic compounds in EEMTAP, and the result revealed the presence of caffeic acid as phenolic acid and quercetin as flavonoid. The proposed HPTLC method is simple, concise and provides a good resolution of caffeic acid and quercetin from other constituents present in EEMTAP.
Macrothelypteris torresiana (Gaudich.), syn. Lastrea torresiana Moore (family: Thelypteridaceae) is a species of fern which is native to tropical and subtropical region of the world. It is a robust fern with a short creeping rhizome [1], [2]. In traditional medicine M. torresiana leaves and roots have a wide range of reputed medicinal applications. The aerial parts are used for treatment of fever, pain, granulation, healing and reducing odour in chronic skin ulcer and inflammation by the tribes of Pakistan, India and China [3]. It is also used in Chinese folk medicine for the treatment of edema for patients suffering from kidney problems [4]. Only few pharmacological properties have been reported from this plant such as renoprotective potential via ameliorating oxidative stress and proinflammatory activities [4], in vitro and in vivo antitumor activities [5], wound healing properties [3], analgesic, antipyretic and anti-inflammation activities [6]. Few phyto-constituents are reported from this fern species such as 5,7-dihydroxy-2-(1,2-isopropyldioxy-4-oxocyclohex-5-enyl)-chromen-4-one, a novel flavonoid isolated from the root [7], 2-(cis-1,2-dihydroxy-4-oxo-cyclohex-5-enyl)−5,7-dihydroxy-chromone, 2-(trans-1,4-dihydroxy-cyclohexyl)−5,7-dihydroxy-chromone, protoapigenin, apigenin, kaempferol and quercetin [8]. An analytical technique for the simultaneous determination of phytochemical constituents was developed by Xiong et al. [9] using liquid chromatographic method with ultra-violet detector and successfully quatified the presence of protoapigenone, protoapigenin 4′-O-β-D-glucoside, apigenin 4′-O-β-D-glucoside, and apigenin.Tissue damage is caused by excessive production of free radicles [10]. Liver is known to be the major organ involved in the detoxification of xenobiotics, and is thus the main target of tissue injury produced by these chemicals and their metabolites. Reactive oxygen species produce deleterious effect on membrane lipids of the cellular components thereby producing peroxidation of lipids which leads to cell death [11]. Liver is also responsible for regulating homeostasis in the body and is involved with almost all the biochemical pathways related to growth, nutrient supply, maintaining immunity and reproduction [12]. Hence prevention of hepatotoxic damage is of great concern. Phenolic acids and flavonoids possesses diverse biological activities including antioxidant and hepatoprotective properties. Recently it has been considered that polyphenolic compounds are great antioxidants and proved to be more effective than Vitamin C, E and Carotenoids [13]. Several flavonoids such as catechin, apigenin, quercetin, naringenin, rutin, and venoruton are also reported to ameliorate hepatotoxic effects [14].High performance thin layer chromatography (HPTLC) is considered more sophisticated, efficient and reliable than thin layer chromatography (TLC) having the latest technical developments for quality assessment and evaluation of botanical materials [15]. Moreover, in HPTLC fingerprinting technique, many samples of divergent nature can be run in a single analysis with simultaneous processing of the sample and standard [16], [17].Literature available from all possible scientific sources revealed that there is only one analytical method developed for the estimation of important phyto-constituents from this fern species, and also there is no scientific proof of the plant's use in liver protection. Therefore, the present study deals with hepatoprotective activity of ethanol extract from M. torresiana aerial parts (EEMTAP) on Wistar albino rats and detection of polyphenolic compounds present in the extract by HPTLC fingerprinting analysis.
Materials and methods
Chemicals and reagents
Standards for HPTLC analysis such as Gallic acid, caffeic acid and quercetin were purchased from Natural Remedies Pvt. Ltd. (Bangalore, India). Silymarin was obtained from Micro labs Ltd. (Bangalore, India). High performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) grade methanol was purchased from Merk India Ltd. (Mumbai, India). All other chemicals and reagents were of analytical grades and was purchased from Sisco Research Laboratories Pvt. Ltd. (Mumbai, India) and Merk India Ltd. (Mumbai, India). Diagnostic kits for the estimation of biochemical parameters were purchased commercially (Span Diagnostics Ltd., Surat, India).
Plant material
The aerial parts of the plant M. torresiana was collected from in and around East Godavari dist., Andhra Pradesh, India and authenticated by Prof. K. Madhava Chetty, Dept. of Botany, Sri Venkateswara University, Tirupati, Andhra Pradesh, India. A voucher specimen has been kept in our research laboratory for further reference.
Preparation of the extract
The collected plant materials were gently washed in tapwater to remove dirt and then they were shade dried in the laboratory under room temperature (24±2 °C) for 3–4 weeks. After complete drying, the dried plant materials were pulverized by using a mechanical grinder followed by sieving (sieve no. 40) to obtain a coarse powder. The powdered plant material (500 g) was extracted with 1.5 L of ethanol (90% v/v) for 48 h using a Soxhlet extractor. The extract obtained was evaporated under vacuum using rotary evaporator (Evator, Media Instrument Mfg. Co., Mumbai, India) and concentrated to obtain a dark greenish residue (yield 10.68%, w/w) which was kept in the refrigerator at 4 °C.The percentage yield of EEMTAP was calculated by the following formula
Preliminary phytochemical tests
Preliminary phytochemical studies of EEMTAP were performed for determination of major phytochemical constituents like alkaloids, carbohydrates, proteins, tannins, sterols, triterpenoids, saponins, and flavonoids using standard procedures [16], [18].
Test for alkaloids
The dry crude extract was dissolved in 2 N Hydrochloric acid. The mixture was filtered and the filtrate was divided into three equal portions. Mayer's test: The first portion was treated with a few drops of Mayer's reagent, appearance of buff coloured precipitate proves the presence of alkaloids. Dragondorff's test: few drops of Dragondorff's reagent was added in second portion where appearance of orange brown precipitate confirms the presence of alkaloids. Wagner's test: The third portion was treated with few drops of Wagner's reagent, formation of reddish brown precipitate proves the presence of alkaloids in the test extract.
Test for carbohydrates
The test extracts were divided into three portions and kept in a test tube. Molisch's test: To the first portion, 10% alcoholic solution of α-napthol were added. The mixture was shaken well and few drops of concentrated sulphuric acid were added along the side of the test tube. Appearance of a violet coloured ring at the junction of the two liquids confirms the presence of carbohydrates. Fehling's test: the second portion was treated with 2 mL of Fehling's solution A and 2 mL of Fehling's solution B and boiled. Formation of brick red precipitate confirms presence of reducing sugars. Benedict's test: the third portion was treated with 5 mL of Benedict's reagent and boiled on a water bath. Formation of brick red precipitate at the bottom of the test tube shows the presence of monosaccharides.
Test for proteins and amino acids
The test extracts were divided into four portions and kept in a test tube. Biuret test: The first portion was treated with 2 mL of 10% sodium hydroxide solution and 2–3 drops of 1% copper sulphate solution and mixed. Appearance of violet or purple colour confirms presence of proteins. Ninhydrin test: The second portion was treated with 0.5 mL of ninhydrin solution and boiled for 2 mins and cooled. Appearance of blue colour confirms presence of proteins. Xanthoproteic test: to the third portion, 1 mL of concentrated nitric acid was added, then boiled and cooled. 40% sodium hydroxide solution was added to the mixture drop by drop. Appearance of coloured solution indicates presence of proteins. Millon's test: the forth portion was treated with 2 mL of Millon's reagent, then boiled and cooled. To the mixture few drops of sodium nitrite solution were added. Appearance of red precipitate or colour indicates presence of proteins.
Test for tannins and phenolic compounds
Ferric chloride test: the test extract was treated with 1% w/w solution of ferric chloride. Appearance of blue/green/brown colour confirms the presence of tannins and phenolic compounds.
Test for steroids and sterols
The test extracts were divided into two portions and kept in test tubes. Liberman Burchard test: The first portion (2 mL test extract solution in chloroform) was treated with few drops of acetic anhydride and mixed well. 1 mL of Conc. H2SO4 was added from side of the test tube. A reddish brown ring is formed at the junction of two layers which confirms the presence of sterols and steroids. Salkowski's test: the second portion (5 mL test extract solution in chloroform) was treated with an equal volume of concentrated sulphuric acid was added gently along the sides of the test tube. The upper chloroform layer and the lower acid layer were observed. The acid layer develops a yellow colour with a green fluorescence and the chloroform layer gives a play of sundry colours first from bluish red to gradually violet red in the presence of sterols and steroids.
Test for triterpenoids
Sulphuric acid test: about 300 mg of extract was mixed with 5 mL chloroform and warmed for 30 min. The chloroform solution was then treated with a few drops of concentrated sulphuric acid and mixed properly. The appearance of red colour indicates the presence of triterpenes.
Test for saponins
Foam test: the test extract of about 300 mg was boiled with 5 mL of distilled water for two minutes. Then the mixture is cooled and mixed vigorously and left idle for three minutes. The formation of frothing indicates the presence of saponins.
Test for flavonoids
The test extracts were divided into three portions and kept in a test tube. Shinoda test: to the first portion a piece of magnesium ribbon and few drops of concentrated hydrochloric acid were added. A pink/magenta colour develops which indicates presence of flavonoids. Ferric chloride test: the second portion was treated with few drops of neutral ferric chloride solution. Appearance of a blackish green colour indicates the presence of flavonoids. Lead acetate test: the third portion was treated with few drops of 10% lead acetate solution. Appearance of yellow precipitate proves the presence of flavonoids in the extract.
Experimental animals and housing conditions
Swiss albino mice (20–25 g) of either sex were used for acute toxicity evaluation and Wistar albino rats (150–250 g) both male and female were used to evaluate hepatoprotective potential. The animals were maintained for at least one week in the animal house at GITAM Institute of Pharmacy, GITAM University, Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh prior to testing and maintained in clean polypropylene cages with optimum light, temperature and humidity (light/dark cycles (12/12 h), Temp: 25±2 °C, and 75% relative humidity) and fed with commercially pelleted rat diet (M/s Hindustan Lever Ltd., Mumbai) and water ad libitum.
Ethical approval
All experimental protocols were approved by the Institutional Animal Ethics Committee (IAEC) of GITAM Institute of Pharmacy, Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh, India (Regd. No.1287/ac/09/CPCSEA and protocol No: IAEC/GIP-1307/B Pharm/IP/SM-HV/11/2012-13). Experiments were performed according to the guide for the care and use of laboratory animals.
Acute toxicity study
The acute toxicity studies were conducted as per the OECD guidelines 423 [19], with slight modifications [20], [21], where the limit test dose of 3000 mg/kg, p.o., was used. The animals were divided into four groups where group I (control group) received only vehicle (3 mL/kg, p.o.), whereas group II, III and IV separately received 100, 2000 and 3000 mg/kg, p.o., of the test extract respectively in a similar manner. Immediately after dosing, the animals were closely observed for the initial 4 h after the administration and then once daily during the following days. The general behavioural changes closely observed were mainly hyperactivity, ataxia, convulsions, salivation, tremors, diarrhoea, lethargy, sleep and coma. They were then kept under observation up to 14 days after drug administration to observe any mortality. One-fifth and one-tenth of the maximum tolerated dose of EEMTAP (600 and 300 mg/kg, body weight, p.o.) was selected for hepatoprotective study.
Assessment of hepatoprotective activity
Experimental groups
Hepatoprotective effect was evaluated against CCl4 induced hepatotoxicity according to standard procedures [22]. Animals were divided into five groups (n=6). Group I (normal control) animals received single dose of water (25 mL/kg, p.o.) daily for 7 days and received single dose of 8 mL/kg olive oil through intraperitoneal (i.p.) injection on 7th day. Group II (toxicant control) animals received 0.2% CCl4 in olive oil (8 mL/kg, i.p.) on 7th day intraperitoneally and were also administered with single dose water (25 mL/kg, p.o.) once daily for 7 days. Group III animals were treated with standard drug silymarin (100 mg/kg, p.o.) once daily for 7 days whereas groups IV and V animals were treated with EEMTAP at doses of 300 and 600 mg/kg, p.o., dissolved in 2% gum acacia once daily for 7 days respectively. Similarly groups III to V animals simultaneously treated with 0.2% CCl4 in olive oil (8 mL/kg, i.p.) on 7th day after 1 h of administration of the silymarin and EEMTAP. After 24 h of treatment, blood from all animals was collected by retro-orbital puncture and after that the animals were sacrificed. Blood was allowed to clot and centrifugation was performed at 3500 rpm for 15 min at 4 °C to separate the serum which was used for the assay of biochemical marker enzyme. Liver tissue samples were taken from the left liver lobe and they were cut into two pieces. One piece was fixed in 10% formalin solution for 24 h for pathological examination; the other piece was used in assessment of lipid peroxidation assay.
Biochemical estimations
Serum which was separated by centrifugation were used to determine the biochemical parameters like serum glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase (SGOT), serum glutamate-pyruvate transaminase (SGPT), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), total bilirubin and total protein using commercially available kits (Span Diagnostics Ltd., Surat, India). Liver weight was also determined by recording the weight of liver with respect to body weight per 100 g.
Assay for hepatic antioxidant activities
Lipid peroxidation (LPO)
Liver tissue (900 mg) was taken from each experimental animals and then it was washed in normal saline and soaked in filter paper. Homogenization of the tissues were done using 3.0 mL (0.15 M) TrisHCl buffer (pH 7.4) and then centrifuged for 1 h at 3000 rpm at 4 °C. The resultant supernatant was collected and estimated for lipid peroxidation. LPO was determined by measuring the amounts of malondialdehyde (MDA) produced primarily which was expressed as n mole/gm liver tissue homogenate [23].
Glutathione (GSH) content
Liver homogenate (30%, m/v) was prepared in 0.15 M Tris–HCl buffer (pH 7.4) and proteins were precipitated by adding trichloroacetic acid. The following samples were centrifuged for 1 h at 15000 rpm at 4 °C. The supernatant obtained was used for determination of glutathione content and was expressed in µmol mg−1 liver tissue homogenate [24].
Catalase (CAT) activity
Homogenization of 900 mg of liver tissue was done using M/150 phosphate buffer in ice and then centrifuged for 1 h at 30000 rpm at 4 °C and the resulting supernatant was collected and catalase activity was measured. An aliquot of the collected liver supernatant (10 μL) was brought in a quartz cuvette, and the reaction was started by the addition of freshly prepared 30 mM hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) in 50 mM phosphate buffer (pH 7.0). The rate of H2O2 decomposition was measured spectrophotometrically by recording the absorbance at 240 nm during 120 s using a Shimadzu UV–VIS spectrophotometer. CAT activity was expressed in µmol×min−1×mg−1 (U/mg liver tissue homogenate). One unit (U) of CAT activity was defined as the amount of extract needed to decompose 1 µmol of H2O2 per min [24].
Histological observation
Fixatives such as picric acid, formaldehyde and 40% glacial acetic acid were used to fix the washed liver for 24 h and were then dehydrated with alcohol. The liver tissue was cleaned and was embedded in paraffin (melting point 58–60 °C). 3–5 µm sections of the liver tissue were cut and stained with haematoxylin and eosin (H and E). After staining they were observed under photomicroscope and the following morphological changes like hepatic cell necrosis, ballooning degeneration, fatty changes or inflammatory cell infiltration and congestion were observed [25].
Statistical analysis
The data obtained in the studies were subjected to one way of analysis of variance (ANOVA) for determining the significant difference. The inter group significance was analysed using Dunnet's t-test. A p-value<0.05 was considered to be significant. All the values were expressed as mean±SEM.
HPTLC fingerprint profile
HPTLC studies were carried out according to the standard methods [26], [27]. The HPTLC fingerprint technique was used to detect possible phenolic acids and flavonoids in EEMTAP.
Sample preparation and stationary phase
EEMTAP was dissolved in methanol which was used for sample. Silica gel 60F 254 HPTLC plates (E. MERCK KGaA) of size (10.0×10.0 cm) were used as the stationary phase.
Sample application
Different applied volume of reference standards gallic and caffeic acid such as 4 μL, 5 μL, 6 μL and 7 μL were used for phenolic acid detection and 2 μL, 3 μL, 4 μL and 5 μL of reference standard quercetin were used for detection of flavonoids. The reference standard along with 10 μL of the extract was applied as a band on the plates using syringe (100 μL), with inert gas flow providing a delivery speed of 150 nL per second. The syringe was mounted on a CAMAG linomat V sample applicator attached to CAMAG HPTLC system and was programmed through WIN CATS software. The length of the applied band was kept at 8 mm.
Development of chromatogram
The plate for phenolic acids was developed in toluene: ethyl acetate: formic acid (4.5:3:0.2, v/v/v) and the plate for flavonoids in toluene: ethyl acetate: methanol: formic acid (4:8:0.5:0.2, v/v/v/v) and 10 mL of mobile phase was used per chromatography run. The linear ascending development was carried out in a (20×10 cm) twin trough glass chamber saturated with the mobile phase.
Detection of spots and photodocumentation
The developed plate was dried by hot air with the help of a hair dryer at a temp of 60 °C to evaporate solvents from the plate. The plate was scanned using D2 lamp at 280 nm in CAMAG TLC Scanner 3. The Rf values and fingerprint data were recorded by WIN CATS software.
Results
Preliminary phytochemical analysis of EEMTAP
Preliminary phytochemical screening of the ethanol extract from M. torresiana aerial parts (EEMTAP) revealed the presence of sterols, flavonoids, saponins, reducing sugar, triterpenoids, tannins and phenolic compounds (Table 1).
Table 1
Preliminary phytochemical tests to identify the presence of various phytochemicals in ethanol extract of Macrothelypteris torresiana aerial parts.
Sl no.
Phytochemicals
Tests performed
Inference
1.
Alkaloids
Mayer's test
−
Dragondorff's test
−
Wagner's test
−
2.
Carbohydrates
Molisch's test
+
Fehling's test
+
Benedict's test
+
3.
Proteins and amino acids
Biuret test
−
Ninhydrin test
−
Xanthoproteic test
−
Millon's test
−
4.
Tannins and phenolic compounds
Ferric chloride test
+
5.
Steroids and sterols
Liberman Burchard test
+
Salkowski's test
+
6.
Triterpenoids
Sulphuric acid test
+
7.
Saponins
Foam test
+
8.
Flavonoids
Shinoda test
+
Ferric chloride test
+
Lead acetate test
+
(−) Absent, (+) Present.
Preliminary phytochemical tests to identify the presence of various phytochemicals in ethanol extract of Macrothelypteris torresiana aerial parts.(−) Absent, (+) Present.
Acute oral toxicity studies
No mortality or morbidity was observed in animals through the 14 day period following single oral administration. Morphological characteristics (fur, skin, eyes and nose) appeared normal. No tremors, convulsions, salivation, diarrhoea, lethargy or unusual behaviours such as self-mutilation and walking backward were observed. Gait and posture, reactivity to sensory stimuli, grip strength was all normal. There was no significant difference in body weights between control and treatment groups. Food and water intake showed daily fluctuations within the range of control animals. This indicates that the ethanol extract from M. torresiana aerial parts was safe up to a single dose of 3000 mg/kg, p.o., body weight in experimental mice.
Hepatoprotective evaluation
Effects of EEMTAP on serum marker enzymes (SGPT, SGOT and ALP), total protein, total bilirubin and liver weight
As indicated from the results (Fig. 1A and B), CCl4 intoxicated animals showed an increase in the activities of SGPT, SGOT, ALP and total bilirubin when compared to the normal control group. Treatment of animals with EEMTAP at the doses of 300 and 600 mg/kg, p.o., or silymarin 100 mg/kg, p.o., significantly decreased the level of serum marker enzymes (SGPT, SGOT and ALP) and total bilirubin compared to the CCl4 intoxicated group. Whereas total protein level was decreased in the CCl4 intoxicated group which was significantly restored to normal level when the animals were treated with EEMTAP at the doses of 300 and 600 mg/kg, p.o., or silymarin 100 mg/kg, p.o., (Fig. 1B). Liver weight was enlarged in CCl4 intoxicated group compared to normal group but it significantly regained its normal size when the animals were treated with EEMTAP at the doses of 300 and 600 mg/kg, p.o., or silymarin 100 mg/kg, p.o., (Fig. 1C).
Fig. 1
Effects of EEMTAP on different biochemical parameters (A) serum marker enzymes (SGPT, SGOT and ALP) (B) total protein and total bilirubin (C) liver weight with respect to body weight per 100 g. Values are expressed as mean±S.E. (n=6). All columns are significant using ANOVA; **P<0.01 when compared to CCl4 intoxicated group; Dunnet's t-test.
Effects of EEMTAP on different biochemical parameters (A) serum marker enzymes (SGPT, SGOT and ALP) (B) total protein and total bilirubin (C) liver weight with respect to body weight per 100 g. Values are expressed as mean±S.E. (n=6). All columns are significant using ANOVA; **P<0.01 when compared to CCl4 intoxicated group; Dunnet's t-test.
Effects of EEMTAP on antioxidant enzymes (LPO, GSH and CAT)
The result showed that there was an increase in levels of LPO in CCl4 intoxicated group. Treatment of the animals with EEMTAP at doses of 300 and 600 mg/kg, p.o., and silymarin (100 mg/kg, p.o.) significantly (P<0.01) decreased the levels of LPO compared to CCl4 intoxicated group (Fig. 2A). The levels of GSH and CAT decreased in CCl4 intoxicated group when compared to control but after treatment of animals with EEMTAP (300 and 600 mg/kg, p.o.) or silymarin (100 mg/kg, p.o.) there was a significant rise in activity of GSH and CAT compared to CCl4 intoxicated group (Fig. 2B and C).
Fig. 2
Effects of EEMTAP on hepatic antioxidant enzymes (A) Lipid peroxidase (LPO) (B) Glutathione (GSH) (C) Catalase (CAT). Values are expressed as mean±S.E. (n=6). All columns are significant using ANOVA; **P<0.01 when compared to CCl4 intoxicated group; Dunnet's t-test.
Effects of EEMTAP on hepatic antioxidant enzymes (A) Lipid peroxidase (LPO) (B) Glutathione (GSH) (C) Catalase (CAT). Values are expressed as mean±S.E. (n=6). All columns are significant using ANOVA; **P<0.01 when compared to CCl4 intoxicated group; Dunnet's t-test.
Histopathological observations
In normal control rats, no abnormal appearance or histopathological changes were observed in the liver (Fig. 3A). When compared to the normal tissues, CCl4 administration caused hepatic damage in rat liver, as demonstrated by hepatic cell necrosis, ballooning degeneration, fatty changes or inflammatory cell infiltration (Fig. 3B). Treatment with silymarin almost restored the normal architecture of liver (Fig. 3C) whereas treatment with EEMTAP decreased the abnormality of liver architecture caused by CCl4 and restored the altered histopathological changes in a dose dependant manner (Fig. 3D and E).
Fig. 3
Paraffin sections of liver stained by haematoxylin and eosin for histopathological changes. (A) Liver section of control group showing normal architecture of normal liver histology. (B) Hepatotoxic liver after treatment of CCl4 showing hepatic cell necrosis, ballooning degeneration, fatty changes or inflammatory cell infiltration. (C) Liver section treated with CCl4+silymarin (100 mg/kg) preserves almost the normal structure of the hepatocytes. (D) Liver section treated with CCl4 and EEMTAP (300 mg/kg) showing mild hepatic cell necrosis and infiltration of inflammatory cells. (E) Liver section treated with CCl4 and EEMTAP (600 mg/kg) showing liver restoring to normalcy with little hepatic damage.
Paraffin sections of liver stained by haematoxylin and eosin for histopathological changes. (A) Liver section of control group showing normal architecture of normal liver histology. (B) Hepatotoxic liver after treatment of CCl4 showing hepatic cell necrosis, ballooning degeneration, fatty changes or inflammatory cell infiltration. (C) Liver section treated with CCl4+silymarin (100 mg/kg) preserves almost the normal structure of the hepatocytes. (D) Liver section treated with CCl4 and EEMTAP (300 mg/kg) showing mild hepatic cell necrosis and infiltration of inflammatory cells. (E) Liver section treated with CCl4 and EEMTAP (600 mg/kg) showing liver restoring to normalcy with little hepatic damage.
HPTLC fingerprinting analysis
Detection of phenolic acids
HPTLC fingerprinting of EEMTAP revealed ten peaks whereas six peaks were revealed in HPTLC fingerprinting of the reference standards gallic acid and caffeic acid. The result showed that one spot has similar Rf value with that of standard caffeic acid (Table 2, Table 3) (Fig. 4, Fig. 5). Thus caffeic acid was detected in EEMTAP. This is the first report of the presence of caffeic acid in this fern species.
Table 2
HPTLC chromatogram of reference standards Gallic acid and Caffeic acid.
Peak
Start Rf
Start height
Max Rf
Max height
Max height %
End Rf
End height
Area
Peak Area %
Assigned substance
1
−0.06
1.0
−0.04
18.9
2.07
−0.02
0.7
269.2
1.15
Unknown
2
−0.02
0.7
−0.00
73.9
8.11
0.02
8.9
1102.7
4.71
Unknown
3
0.11
4.8
0.16
300.9
32.99
0.19
0.0
7140.9
30.52
Gallic acid
4
0.24
3.6
0.31
414.8
45.50
0.35
1.2
9924.6
42.42
Caffeic acid
5
0.63
1.0
0.70
60.1
6.59
0.73
47.8
2950.7
12.61
Unknown
6
0.76
42.6
0.77
43.1
4.73
0.87
0.2
2007.8
8.58
Unknown
Table 3
HPTLC chromatogram of EEMTAP for detection of phenolic acids.
Peak
Start Rf
Start height
Max Rf
Max height
Max height %
End Rf
End height
Area
Peak Area %
Assigned substance
1
−0.06
1.2
−0.05
28.8
1.66
−0.03
13.3
379.4
0.68
Unknown
2
−0.03
13.4
−0.01
794.0
45.83
0.05
142.6
21080.2
37.79
Unknown
3
0.06
142.6
0.07
162.2
9.36
0.16
33.1
6407.1
11.48
Unknown
4
0.23
27.2
0.27
42.2
2.43
0.28
41.1
1113.2
2.0
Unknown
5
0.28
40.9
0.33
306.2
17.68
0.39
41.9
12067.0
21.63
Caffeic acid
6
0.39
42.4
0.42
177.1
10.22
0.46
20.1
4276.5
7.67
Unknown
7
0.46
20.2
0.47
21.8
1.26
0.51
9.0
669.8
1.20
Unknown
8
0.58
1.7
0.62
36.4
2.10
0.65
18.5
1074.4
1.93
Unknown
9
0.65
18.8
0.69
65.5
3.78
0.71
61.8
2263.0
4.06
Unknown
10
073
61.6
0.79
98.3
5.68
0.86
9.5
6456.6
11.57
Unknown
Fig. 4
(A) 3D display of HPTLC chromatogram of EEMTAP for detection of phenolic acids. (B) HPTLC chromatographic plate for phenolic acids detection in EEMTAP viewed at 254 nm. (C) HPTLC chromatographic plate for phenolic acids detection in EEMTAP viewed at 366 nm.
Fig. 5
(A) Peak densitogram of reference standards gallic acid and caffeic acid. (B) Peak densitogram of EEMTAP showing the presence of caffeic acid.
(A) 3D display of HPTLC chromatogram of EEMTAP for detection of phenolic acids. (B) HPTLC chromatographic plate for phenolic acids detection in EEMTAP viewed at 254 nm. (C) HPTLC chromatographic plate for phenolic acids detection in EEMTAP viewed at 366 nm.(A) Peak densitogram of reference standards gallic acid and caffeic acid. (B) Peak densitogram of EEMTAP showing the presence of caffeic acid.HPTLC chromatogram of reference standards Gallic acid and Caffeic acid.HPTLC chromatogram of EEMTAP for detection of phenolic acids.
Detection of flavonoids
HPTLC fingerprinting of EEMTAP revealed eleven peaks whereas five peaks were revealed in HPTLC fingerprinting of the reference standard quercetin. The result showed that there was one spot which showed similar Rf value to that of standard quercetin (Table 4, Table 5) (Fig. 6, Fig. 7). Thus quercetin was detected in EEMTAP.
Table 4
HPTLC chromatogram of reference standard Quercetin.
Peak
Start Rf
Start height
Max Rf
Max height
Max height %
End Rf
End height
Area
Peak Area %
Assigned substance
1
−0.06
0.0
−0.04
10.6
1.84
−0.03
2.6
105.9
0.45
Unknown
2
−0.03
3.4
−0.03
19.3
3.34
−0.02
2.2
107.8
0.46
Unknown
3
−0.02
0.6
−0.01
33.2
5.74
0.02
3.2
500.9
2.13
Unknown
4
0.47
22.6
0.60
497.4
85.86
0.64
3.2
21828.3
93.02
Quercetin
5
0.74
4.9
0.80
187
3.22
0.86
2.7
924
3.94
Unknown
Table 5
HPTLC chromatogram of EEMTAP for detection of flavonoids.
Peak
Start Rf
Start height
Max Rf
Max height
Max height %
End Rf
End height
Area
Peak Area %
Assigned substance
1
−0.02
0.8
−0.01
769.2
33.54
0.04
331.8
24409.4
31.26
Unknown
2
0.05
333.1
0.05
338.5
14.76
0.13
119.4
12889.7
16.50
Unknown
3
0.13
118.5
0.14
119.7
5.22
0.18
88.0
3997.4
5.12
Unknown
4
0.18
88.0
0.22
216.7
9.45
0.26
58.5
7292.0
9.34
Unknown
5
0.27
60.3
0.32
107.9
4.70
0.35
54.8
4482.1
5.74
Unknown
6
0.35
55.0
0.37
96.8
4.22
0.44
33.3
4172.5
5.34
Unknown
7
0.50
35.1
0.66
376.5
16.42
0.60
80.0
13864.8
17.75
Quercetin
8
0.60
80.9
0.62
131.2
5.72
0.66
10.4
3459.3
4.43
Unknown
9
0.66
10.6
0.68
13.3
0.58
0.70
1.1
267.8
0.34
Unknown
10
0.70
0.0
0.74
29.0
1.26
0.78
2.9
774.0
0.99
Unknown
11
0.79
0.2
0.84
94.4
4.11
0.87
3.3
2487.3
3.18
Unknown
Fig. 6
(A) 3D display of HPTLC chromatogram of EEMTAP for detection of flavonoids. (B) HPTLC chromatographic plate for flavonoid detection in EEMTAP viewed at 254 nm. (C) HPTLC chromatographic plate for flavonoid detection in EEMTAP viewed at 366 nm.
Fig. 7
(A) Peak densitogram of reference standard quercetin. (B) Peak densitogram of EEMTAP showing the presence of quercetin.
(A) 3D display of HPTLC chromatogram of EEMTAP for detection of flavonoids. (B) HPTLC chromatographic plate for flavonoid detection in EEMTAP viewed at 254 nm. (C) HPTLC chromatographic plate for flavonoid detection in EEMTAP viewed at 366 nm.(A) Peak densitogram of reference standard quercetin. (B) Peak densitogram of EEMTAP showing the presence of quercetin.HPTLC chromatogram of reference standard Quercetin.HPTLC chromatogram of EEMTAP for detection of flavonoids.
Discussion
CCl4 is a hepatotoxin which is used extensively for inducing liver injury in various experimental models to elucidate the mechanisms underlying hepatotoxicity [28]. CCl4 mediated hepatotoxicity is developed from the biotransformation of CCl4 by cytochrome P450 2E1 to the trichloromethyl free radical (CCl3). Conversion of this free radical to a highly reactive species (CCl3O2) is done by reaction with oxygen. Trichloromethylperoxy radical binds covalently to cellular macromolecules and leads to a chain reaction of polyunsaturated fatty acids in the cytoplasmic membrane phospholipids, causing functional and morphological changes to the cell membrane, and finally, cell necrosis [29].Hepatocytic damage is characterised by different hepatic marker enzymes (SGPT, SGOT and ALP) and the levels of total bilirubin and total protein. When liver cells are damaged, these enzymes leak into the bloodstream from liver tissue and produce markedly elevated serum levels [30]. Both SGOT and SGPT are associated with liver parenchymal cells. SGPT is found predominantly in the liver with negligible quantities found in heart, kidneys and skeletal muscles, whereas SGOT is found in liver, cardiac muscles, skeletal muscles, brain, kidney and red blood cells. Thus SGPT is a more specific indicator of liver intoxication as levels of SGOT may also be increased in diseases affecting other organs [31]. On the other hand, serum ALP and bilirubin levels are related to the functions of hepatic cell. Elevation in level of serum ALP is due to increased synthesis, in presence of increased biliary pressure. Our experiment showed that rats which are intoxicated with CCL4 develop a significant liver necrosis which was evidenced by increased level of hepatic marker enzymes (SGPT, SGOT and ALP) and the levels of total bilirubin, whereas levels of total protein were decreased due to liver injury. The result of this study showed that after administration with EEMTAP the levels of the serum marker enzymes (SGPT, SGOT and ALP) and the levels of total bilirubin and total protein were restored to normal level, thus indicated that EEMTAP preserved the structural integrity of hepatocellular components and protected the liver from the harmful effect of this hepatotoxin.Here our research also evaluated the effect of EEMTAP on hepatic antioxidant enzymes such as LPO, GSH and CAT whose levels were impaired due to oxidative stress caused by CCl4. An important mechanism involved in the protection against CCl4-induced liver damage is the inhibition of excessive ROS production. MDA is widely used as a marker of lipid peroxidation and a major parameter for the status of oxidative stress [32]. The hepatic MDA level increases under the enhancement of oxidative stress in a rodent model [33]. Here in our study rats treated with CCl4 exhibited a significant rise in MDA level (Lipid peroxidation assay) compared to control group. Treatment with EEMPTAP significantly reduced the CCl4 induced hepatic MDA elevation. Thus EEMTAP provides protective effect against CCl4 induced liver damage in terms of preventing lipid peroxide formation and blocking oxidative chain reaction. The defence system in the body also includes small molecules such as GSH, vitamin E as well as antioxidant enzymes [34]. The activities of hepatic antioxidants including GSH and CAT were declined by CCl4 administration to rats, which is stated in earlier studies [35]. Here our study revealed that treatment with EEMTAP ameliorated the impaired antioxidative defence system in rat livers, as indicated by the restoration of enzymatic activities.The above inferences were further confirmed by histopathological studies. The result of the histopathology showed that CCl4 administration caused severe acute liver damage in rats which is characterised by hepatic cell necrosis, ballooning degeneration, fatty changes or inflammatory cell infiltration and other histological manifestations, which were consistent with previous findings [36], [37]. After treatment with EEMTAP the severity of hepatic injury caused by CCl4 administration were significantly prevented and the structure of hepatocytes were almost restored to normal. The results of the different biochemical parameters, hepatic antioxidant enzymes and the histopathological finding co-related well with each other, which indicated that EEMTAP possesses significant hepatoprotective effect in CCl4 intoxicated liver injury in rats.HPTLC is an invaluable quality assessment tool for the evaluation of botanical materials, and it allows for the analysis of a broad number of compounds both efficiently and cost effectively. HPTLC analysis were performed to detect possible polyphenolic compounds in EEMTAP. Analysis of the extract for phenolic acids showed the presence of ten peaks out of which one peak is comparable with standard Caffeic acid, whereas in detection of flavonoids, eleven peaks were observed out of which one peak is comparable to standard quercetin. Thus EEMTAP revealed the presence of caffeic acid and quercetin, both of which have been previously reported to possess hepatoprotective properties [38]. Apigenin, a flavonoid derivative was identified from this fern by Xiong et al. [9] which is reported to possess hepatoprotective properties [14].The HPTLC analysis method employed in this work resulted in good peak shape and enabled good resolution of caffeic acid and quercetin from other constituents present in the extract. Thus this HPTLC method was successful in detection of polyphenolic compounds such as caffeic acid and quercetin and this is the first study to report the presence of caffeic acid in this plant. Therefore, we can consider that these identified compounds either individually or synergistically might be responsible for its hepatoprotective action against CCl4 induced hepatotoxicity in rats.
Conclusion
The present study demonstrated that the ethanolic extract obtained from the aerial parts of M. torresiana (family: Thelypteridaceae) possesses significant hepatoprotective activity against CCl4 induced hepatotoxicity in Wistar albino rats. Acute toxicity studies on Swiss albino mice revealed that EEMTAP has a reasonable safety profile. The HPTLC fingerprint analysis of EEMTAP showed the presence of caffeic acid and quercetin. This is the first report of the presence of caffeic acid on this fern species. The hepatoprotective activity of EEMTAP may be due to the presence of caffeic acid and quercetin as they both are reported to possess hepatoprotective effects. Therefore, the study shows that there is a prospective future in the use of plants as a source of natural medicine for curing various diseases due to the presence of medicinally important phyto-constituents in plants.