| Literature DB >> 29403930 |
Mahesha M Poojary1, Kanivebagilu A Vishnumurthy1, Airody Vasudeva Adhikari1.
Abstract
The present work involves extraction of phytochemicals from the root bark of a well-known Indian traditional medicinal plant, viz. Mammea suriga, with various solvents and evaluation of their in vitro antimicrobial and antioxidant activities using standard methods. The phytochemical analysis indicates the presence of some interesting secondary metabolites like flavonoids, cardiac glycosides, alkaloids, saponins and tannins in the extracts. Also, the solvent extracts displayed promising antimicrobial activity against Staphylococcus aureus, Bacillus subtilis and Cryptococcus neoformans with inhibition zone in a range of 20-33 mm. Further, results of their antioxidant screening revealed that aqueous extract (with IC50 values of 111.51±1.03 and 31.05±0.92 μg/mL in total reducing power assay and DPHH radical scavenging assay, respectively) and ethanolic extract (with IC50 values of 128.00±1.01 and 33.25±0.89 μg/mL in total reducing power assay and DPHH radical scavenging assay, respectively) were better antioxidants than standard ascorbic acid. Interestingly, FT-IR analysis of each extract established the presence of various biologically active functional groups in it.Entities:
Keywords: Antimicrobial activity; Antioxidant assay; FT-IR analysis; Mammea suriga; Phytochemical analysis
Year: 2015 PMID: 29403930 PMCID: PMC5762209 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpha.2015.01.002
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Pharm Anal ISSN: 2214-0883
Yield, color and consistency of root bark extracts of M. suriga.
| Extracts | Extraction yield (%) | Color and consistency |
|---|---|---|
| Petroleum ether | 7.4 | Yellowish gum |
| Chloroform | 8.8 | Reddish gum |
| Ethyl acetate | 9.3 | Reddish gum |
| Ethanol | 11.5 | Reddish semisolid |
| Water | 10.43 | Reddish solid |
Preliminary phytochemical screening.
| Phytochemical group | Petroleum ether extract | Chloroform extract | Ethyl acetate extract | Ethanol extract | Aqueous extract |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Flavonoids | − | + | + | + | + |
| Carbohydrates | − | − | − | − | − |
| Reducing sugars | − | − | − | − | − |
| Cardiac glycosides | + | + | + | + | + |
| Saponins | − | − | − | + | + |
| Tannins | − | − | + | − | − |
| Proteins | − | − | − | − | + |
| Alkaloids | + | + | + | + | + |
+: Present and −: not present.
Antibacterial and antifungal activities of different extracts of M. suriga.
| Extract/standard | Average of inhibition zone diameter (mm) | ||||||
| Bacterial strains | Fungal strains | ||||||
| Petroleum ether | 9±1.2 | 32±1.5 | – | 25±0.8 | 9±0.6 | 11±0.3 | 20±1.4 |
| Chloroform | 9±0.6 | 31±0.5 | – | 23±0.7 | 9±0.8 | 12±0.4 | 13±1.1 |
| Ethyl acetate | 9±0.5 | 28±1.3 | – | 23±0.5 | – | 12±0.8 | 16±1.2 |
| Ethanol | 9±1.3 | 32±0.8 | – | 20±1.2 | – | – | 22±1.2 |
| Aqueous | 10±1.0 | 33±1.4 | 10±1.2 | 24±0.6 | – | – | 23±0.8 |
| CCS | 23±1.4 | – | – | 23± 0.9 | 22±0.7 | NT | NT |
| CT | 23±0.7 | 10±0.8 | 23±0.3 | NT | 23±0.8 | NT | NT |
| TCA | NT | 16±1.2 | 23±0.5 | 19±1.2 | 19±1.3 | NT | NT |
| FZ | NT | NT | NT | NT | NT | 10±0.5 | 40±1.5 |
NT – Not tested.
CCS – Clairo mono cefoperazone sublactum (75 µg/disc).
CT – Cefoxitin (30 µg/disc).
TCA – Ticarcilinclavulanic acid (85 µg/disc).
FZ – Flucanazole (111 µg/mL).
Fig. 1Petri dishes showing an antimicrobial activity with inhibition zones. (A) Staphylococcus aureus and (B) Bacillus subtilis.
Fig. 2Total reducing power assay of extracts.
Fig. 3IC50 values for different extracts in reducing power assay.
Fig. 4DPPH scavenging assay of extracts.
Fig. 5IC50 values for different extracts in DPPH radical scavenging assay.
Major bands observed in the FT-IR spectra of various extracts.
| Extract | IR | Probable phytochemicals |
|---|---|---|
| Petroleum ether | 3322.8 (H-bonded O–H stretching; broad or –N–H stretching), 2966.4 (aldehydic –C–H stretching), 2924.6 (–C–H stretching), 2668.0 (carboxylic acid –O–H stretching), 1705.4 (aldehyde/ketone –C=O stretching), 1668.0 (–C=C– stretching), 1590.5 (–NH bending), 1372.3 (–CH3 bending), 1228.3 (–C–H in-plane bending), 1192.7 (amine C–N stretching), 1125.6 [–C–C(O)–C (acetate) ester stretching] | Alkaloids, flavonoids, poly phenols, carboxylic acid containing phytochemicals etc. |
| Chloroform | 3322.0 (H-bonded O–H stretching; broad or –N–H stretching), 2966.6 (aldehydic –C–H stretching), 2924.7 (–C–H stretching), 2668.7 (carboxylic acid –O–H stretching), 1708.5 (aldehyde/ketone –C=O stretching), 1592.2(–NH bending), 1372.8 (alkane CH3 bending), 1192.8 ( amine C–N stretching) | Alkaloids, flavonoids, poly phenols etc. |
| Ethyl acetate | 3321.7 (H-bonded O–H stretching; broad or –N–H stretching), 2966.8 (aldehydic –C–H stretching), 2925.1 ((–C–H stretching), 2668.6 (carboxylic acid –O–H stretching), 1708.8 (aldehyde/ketone –C=O stretching), 1592.7 (–NH bending), 1373.0 (alkane CH3 bending), 1192.6 (amine C–N stretching) | Alkaloids, flavonoids, poly phenols, tannins etc. |
| Ethanol | 3322.0 (H-bonded O–H stretching; broad or –N–H stretching), 2966.8 (aldehydic –C–H stretching), 2924.0 (–C–H stretching) 2668.9 (carboxylic acid –O–H stretching), 1706.6 (aldehyde/ketone –C=O stretching), 1591.2 (–NH bending), 1372.7 (alkane CH3 bending), 1193.0 ( amine C–N stretching) | Alkaloids, flavonoids, poly phenols etc. |
| Aqueous | 3260.2 (H-bonded O–H stretching; broad), 1606.3 [ alkene C=C stretch (conjugated)], 1518.6 (–NH bending), 1440 (carboxylic acid –OH bending) | Alkaloids, flavonoids, poly phenols etc. |
Fig. 6FT-IR spectrum of petroleum ether extract.
Fig. 7FT-IR spectrum of aqueous extract.