Literature DB >> 2940318

Attention and interference in the perception of brief visual displays.

P Dixon.   

Abstract

When a single target was displayed 100-200 ms after a five-item array, observers were remarkably poor at deciding whether or not the target was in the array; performance was much better when the target either preceded the array or followed it by a longer interval. This effect was independent of a number of visual display parameters, suggesting that it was not due to visual contour interaction. In addition, visual similarity did not interact with the effect, indicating that it probably did not occur during item identification either. However, when observers added one to a digit target before deciding whether it occurred in the array, the effect was substantially reduced. The results suggested a model in which abstract identity information about the target is confused with the array at certain temporal intervals. A quantitative version of this model fit the data quite well.

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 2940318     DOI: 10.1037//0096-1523.12.2.133

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  4 in total

1.  The word-detection effect: sophisticated guessing or perceptual enhancement?

Authors:  W Prinzmetal; C E Lyon
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1996-05

2.  Effects of global electrosensory signals on motion processing in the midbrain of Eigenmannia.

Authors:  John U Ramcharitar; Eric W Tan; Eric S Fortune
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2005-09-13       Impact factor: 1.836

3.  Conceptual and physical differences in the category effect.

Authors:  P Dixon; J M Shedden
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1987-11

4.  The category effect in visual detection and partial report.

Authors:  P Dixon
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1985-09
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.