Literature DB >> 2940317

Decision processes in visual discrimination of line orientation.

R Vogels, G A Orban.   

Abstract

The contribution of decision factors to the meridional variations in line orientation discrimination was determined for two-alternative forced-choice experimental designs. Using Johnson's (1980) formalization of decision processes in discrimination tasks, we identified three decision factors: the decision rule, memory variance, and criterial noise. In a first experiment, we showed the effect of experimental design on orientation discrimination to be similar at horizontal and oblique standard orientations, indicating that the meridional variations in orientation discrimination were not due to a decision rule anisotropy. In a second experiment, the effect of the interstimulus interval was also found to be similar at both standard orientations, suggesting that the memory variance is isotropic in the orientation domain. The results of two other experiments supported the hypothesis that the meridional variations in orientation discrimination are not due to a criterial noise anisotropy. These different results strongly suggested that the oblique effect in line orientation discrimination is due to sensorial factors rather than to decision factors. Therefore, they further support the hypothesis linking the anisotropy of the preferred orientation distribution of Area 17-S cells (a single physiologically defined class of cells in the primary visual cortex) and the meridional variations in line orientation discrimination.

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 2940317     DOI: 10.1037//0096-1523.12.2.115

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  17 in total

1.  Enumeration versus multiple object tracking: the case of action video game players.

Authors:  C S Green; D Bavelier
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2005-12-15

2.  The role of early visual cortex in visual short-term memory and visual attention.

Authors:  Shani Offen; Denis Schluppeck; David J Heeger
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2008-03-07       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Quantitative study of striate single unit responses in monkeys performing an orientation discrimination task.

Authors:  R Vogels; G A Orban
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Population coding of stimulus orientation by striate cortical cells.

Authors:  R Vogels
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 2.086

5.  Symmetry-based methodology for decision-rule identification in same--different experiments.

Authors:  Alexander A Petrov
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2009-12

6.  Decision factors affecting line orientation judgments in the method of single stimuli.

Authors:  R Vogels; G A Orban
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1986-08

7.  Decision strategies and visual-field asymmetries in same-different judgments of word meaning.

Authors:  M A Francis; R J Irwin
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1995-05

8.  Different perceptual tasks performed with the same visual stimulus attribute activate different regions of the human brain: a positron emission tomography study.

Authors:  P Dupont; G A Orban; R Vogels; G Bormans; J Nuyts; C Schiepers; M De Roo; L Mortelmans
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1993-12-01       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Occlusion cues contribute to orientation judgments of occlusion-defined contours.

Authors:  P De Weerd; E Vandenbussche; G A Orban
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1993-12

10.  Perceptual asymmetries are preserved in short-term memory tasks.

Authors:  Leila Montaser-Kouhsari; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 2.199

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.