Literature DB >> 2940314

Memory storage and retrieval processes in category learning.

W K Estes.   

Abstract

The detailed course of learning is studied for categorization tasks defined by independent or contingent probability distributions over the features of category exemplars. College-age subjects viewed sequences of bar charts that simulated symptom patterns and responded to each chart with a recognition and a categorization judgment. Fuzzy, probabilistically defined categories were learned relatively rapidly when individual features were correlated with category assignment, more slowly when only patterns carried category information. Limits of performance were suboptimal, evidently because of capacity limitations on judgmental processes as well as limitations on memory. Categorization proved systematically related to feature and exemplar probabilities, under different circumstances, and to similarity among exemplars of categories. Unique retrieval cues for exemplar patterns facilitated recognition but entered into categorization only at retention intervals within the range of short-term memory. The findings are interpreted within the framework of a general array model that yields both exemplar-similarity and feature-frequency models as special cases and provides quantitative accounts of the course of learning in each of the categorization tasks studied.

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 2940314     DOI: 10.1037//0096-3445.115.2.155

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen        ISSN: 0022-1015


  12 in total

1.  The influence of prior knowledge in intentional versus incidental concept learning.

Authors:  W D Wattenmaker
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1999-07

2.  Categorization of novel stimuli in well-known natural concepts: a case study.

Authors:  G Storms; P De Boeck; W Ruts
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2001-06

3.  Traps in the route to models of memory and decision.

Authors:  W K Estes
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2002-03

4.  Learning categories at different hierarchical levels: a comparison of category learning models.

Authors:  T J Palmeri
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1999-09

5.  Typicality in logically defined categories: exemplar-similarity versus rule instantiation.

Authors:  R M Nosofsky
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1991-03

6.  Presentation order and recognition of categorically related examples.

Authors:  D L Medin; J G Bettger
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1994-06

7.  Comparing decision bound and exemplar models of categorization.

Authors:  W T Maddox; F G Ashby
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1993-01

8.  Influence of manipulated category knowledge on prototype classification and recognition.

Authors:  D Homa; B Goldhardt; L Burruel-Homa; J C Smith
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1993-07

9.  Effects of presentation rate and individual differences in short-term memory capacity on an indirect measure of serial learning.

Authors:  P A Frensch; C S Miner
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1994-01

10.  Comparing models of rule-based classification learning: a replication and extension of Shepard, Hovland, and Jenkins (1961).

Authors:  R M Nosofsky; M A Gluck; T J Palmeri; S C McKinley; P Glauthier
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1994-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.