Literature DB >> 29402442

Distribution, source identification and health risk assessment of PFASs and two PFOS alternatives in groundwater from non-industrial areas.

Changlong Wei1, Qing Wang2, Xin Song3, Xing Chen2, Renjun Fan4, Da Ding1, Yun Liu4.   

Abstract

Little research has been carried out for the per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs) in groundwater from non-industrial areas, even though it has been proved that PFASs can transport for long distance. In this study, the concentration profiles and geographical distribution of 14 PFASs, including two alternatives of perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS), 6:2 fluorotelomer sulfonate (6:2 FTS) and potassium 9-chlorohexadecafluoro-3-oxanonane-1-sulfonate (F-53B), were analyzed in groundwater samples (n = 102) collected from water wells in non-industrial areas. The total concentrations of PFASs (Σ14PFASs) in groundwater samples ranged from 2.69 to 556 ng/L (mean 43.1 ng/L). The detection rates of shorter chain (C4-C9) PFASs were 62.75-100%, higher than those of long chain (> C10) PFASs with detection rates of less than 40%. The source identification using hierarchical cluster analysis and Spearman rank correlation analysis suggested that domestic sewage and atmospheric deposition may contribute significantly to the PFAS occurrence in groundwater in non-industrial areas, while the nearby industrial parks may contribute some, but not at a significant level. Furthermore, the human health risk assessment analysis shows that the health hazards associated with perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) and PFOS, two of the main PFAS constituents in groundwater from non-industrial areas, were one or two orders of magnitude higher than those in a previous study, but were unlikely to cause long-term harm to the residents via the drinking water exposure pathway alone.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  6:2 FTS; F-53B; Groundwater contamination; Non-industrial areas; PFASs; Risk assessment

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29402442     DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2018.01.039

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecotoxicol Environ Saf        ISSN: 0147-6513            Impact factor:   6.291


  5 in total

Review 1.  PFAS Molecules: A Major Concern for the Human Health and the Environment.

Authors:  Emiliano Panieri; Katarina Baralic; Danijela Djukic-Cosic; Aleksandra Buha Djordjevic; Luciano Saso
Journal:  Toxics       Date:  2022-01-18

Review 2.  Per- and poly-fluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) and female reproductive outcomes: PFAS elimination, endocrine-mediated effects, and disease.

Authors:  Brittany P Rickard; Imran Rizvi; Suzanne E Fenton
Journal:  Toxicology       Date:  2021-11-10       Impact factor: 4.571

3.  Select Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS) Induce Resistance to Carboplatin in Ovarian Cancer Cell Lines.

Authors:  Brittany P Rickard; Xianming Tan; Suzanne E Fenton; Imran Rizvi
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-05-05       Impact factor: 6.208

4.  Legacy and alternative per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances in the U.S. general population: Paired serum-urine data from the 2013-2014 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.

Authors:  Antonia M Calafat; Kayoko Kato; Kendra Hubbard; Tao Jia; Julianne Cook Botelho; Lee-Yang Wong
Journal:  Environ Int       Date:  2019-07-31       Impact factor: 9.621

5.  Early Warnings by Liver Organoids on Short- and Long-Chain PFAS Toxicity.

Authors:  Stefano Palazzolo; Isabella Caligiuri; Andrea Augusto Sfriso; Matteo Mauceri; Rossella Rotondo; Davide Campagnol; Vincenzo Canzonieri; Flavio Rizzolio
Journal:  Toxics       Date:  2022-02-18
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.