| Literature DB >> 29401501 |
Takashi Inomata1, Satoshi Konno1, Katsura Nagai1, Masaru Suzuki1, Masaharu Nishimura1.
Abstract
Pulmonary Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC) infection is increasing in prevalence worldwide even in immunocompetent individuals. Despite its variable clinical course, the clinical and immunological factors associated with radiographical severity and progression are not largely unknown. We aimed to study the association between the inflammatory cell and cytokine profiles at the local infected site, and the radiological severity and/or progression of pulmonary MAC infection. In this retrospective cohort study, 22 healthy subjects and 37 consecutive patients who were diagnosed as having pulmonary MAC infection by positive cultures of bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluids were enrolled. The 37 patients were divided into 2 groups based on the predominant BAL inflammatory cell type: the lymphocyte-dominant (LD) group and neutrophil-dominant (ND) groups. The high-resolution computed tomography score in both the lavaged segment and whole lung and cytokines profiles were compared between the 2 groups. The clinical course after the BAL procedure was also compared between the 2 groups. Both the segment and whole lung scores in the ND group were significantly higher than the LD group (P < 0.001). Levels of IL-8 in the BAL fluids were significantly higher in the ND group compared to the LD group (P = 0.01). In contrast, levels of IL-22 were significantly lower in the ND group compared to the LD group (P < 0.001). The prevalence of patients who showed deterioration of the disease was significantly higher in the ND group (83.3%) than the LD group (12.5%) (P < 0.01). Neutrophil-predominant inflammatory response at the infected site is associated with the radiographical severity and progression of pulmonary MAC infection.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29401501 PMCID: PMC5798761 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0190189
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Summary of the HRCT scoring system of the lavaged lung.
| Category | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | |
| Severity of Bronchiectasis | Absent | Mild (1–2 x diameter of adjacent vessel) | Moderate (2–3 x diameter of adjacent vessel) | Severe (>3 x diameter of adjacent vessel) |
| Severity of bronchial wall thickening | Absent | Mild (<0.5 x diameter of adjacent vessel) | Moderate (0.5–1 x diameter of adjacent vessel) | Severe (>1 x diameter of adjacent vessel) |
| Extent of bronchiectasis | Absent | 1%-25% | 25%-50% | >50% |
| Extent of multiple nodules or small nodules | Absent | 1%-25% | 25%-50% | >50% |
| Sacculations or abscesses (% of segmental area) | Absent | 1%-25% | 25%-50% | >50% |
| Extent of mosaic perfusion (% of segmental area) | Absent | 1%-25% | 25%-50% | >50% |
| Collapse or consolidation | Absent | 1%-25% | 25%-50% | >50% |
HRCT; high-resolution computed tomography
Fig 1Total, differential cell and lymphocyte profiles in the BALF of control and MAC patients.
Cell pellets were counted in a hemocytometer, and Diff-Quik™ (International Reagents, Kobe, Japan)-stained smears were used to identify the differential profiles after cytospin preparation. Differential counts were performed by examining 300 cells using a standard light microscope. Data are represented as means ± SEM. *P < 0.05 ** P < 0.01 †P < 0.001. Mϕ = Macrophage, Neu = Neutrophil, Ly = Lymphocyte. LD: lymphocyte-dominant. ND: neutrophil-dominant. MAC: Mycobacterium avium complex.
Subject characteristics.
| Characteristics | Control | MAC patients | P value | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All | LD | ND | Control | LD | ||
| Age(y), median[min-max] | 60[20–71] | 65[45–78] | 66[45–78] | 62[47–76] | 0.03 | 0.60 |
| Sex (M/F) | 7/15 | 4/33 | 2/20 | 2/13 | 0.08 | 0.90 |
| Cigarette smoking status | ||||||
| Current/Former/Never | 1/4/17 | 1/7/29 | 0/3/19 | 1/4/10 | 0.90 | 0.23 |
| MAC strain | ||||||
| | 33 | 20 | 13 | 0.90 | ||
| | 4 | 2 | 2 | |||
Data are presented as the number of subjects except median age. LD; Lymphocyte-dominant group, ND; Neutrophil-dominant group.
Cell differentiation status in the lungs of different groups.
| Control | MAC patients | P value | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All | LD | ND | Control | LD vs. ND | ||
| Total cell count (x104/ml) | 12.7 ± 1.8 | 41.3 ± 8.5 | 21.2 ± 4.3 | 70.8 ± 17.7 | 0.013 | 0.003 |
| Neutrophils (%) | 0.7 ± 0.2 | 25.9 ± 5.6 | 3.3 ± 0.8 | 58.9 ± 8.0 | 0.001 | <0.001 |
| Neutrophils (x104/ml) | 0.1 ± 0.1 | 22.7 ± 8.0 | 0.8 ± 0.2 | 54.8 ±16.9 | 0.03 | <0.001 |
| Lymphocytes (%) | 7.6 ± 1.4 | 19.9 ± 3.1 | 28.8 ± 4.1 | 6.8 ± 1.5 | 0.004 | <0.001 |
| Lymphocytes (x104/ml) | 0.9 ± 0.1 | 5.8 ± 1.4 | 7.0 ± 2.1 | 4.0 ± 1.3 | 0.007 | 0.3 |
| CD4+ T cells (x104/ml) | 0.4 ± 0.1 | 4.1 ± 1.0 | 5.1 ± 1.5 | 2.7 ± 1.0 | <0.001 | 0.26 |
| CD8+ T cells (x104/ml) | 0.3 ± 0.1 | 1.3 ± 0.3 | 1.7 ± 0.5 | 0.8 ± 0.2 | 0.02 | 0.18 |
| CD4/CD8 ratio | 1.8 ± 0.1 | 3.8 ± 0.4 | 4.1 ± 0.6 | 3.3 ± 0.4 | <0.001 | 0.27 |
Data are presented as mean ± SEM. LD; Lymphocyte-dominant group, ND; Neutrophil-dominant group.
HRCT scores of lavaged pulmonary segments.
| MAC patients | P value | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| All | LD | ND | ||
| Severity of bronchiectasis | 0.89 ± 0.11 | 0.73 ± 0.12 | 1.13 ± 0.19 | 0.06 |
| Severity of bronchial wall thickening | 0.73 ± 0.10 | 0.55 ± 0.11 | 1.00 ± 0.17 | 0.02 |
| Extent of bronchiectasis | 1.11 ± 0.15 | 0.82 ± 0.13 | 1.53 ± 0.28 | 0.016 |
| Extent of multiple nodules or small nodules | 1.16 ± 0.15 | 0.77 ± 0.10 | 1.73 ± 0.28 | <0.001 |
| Sacculations or abscesses | 0.46 ± 0.11 | 0.18 ± 0.08 | 0.87 ± 0.20 | <0.001 |
| Extent of mosaic perfusion | 0.08 ± 0.06 | 0 ± 0 | 0.27 ± 0.15 | 0.04 |
| Collapse or consolidation | 0.41 ± 0.09 | 0.32 ± 0.10 | 0.93 ± 0.15 | 0.001 |
| Segment score | 4.84 ± 0.57 | 3.27 ± 0.41 | 7.13 ± 1.02 | <0.001 |
Data are presented by mean ± SEM. LD; Lymphocyte-dominant group, ND; Neutrophil-dominant group.
Characteristics of subjects who were followed-up without treatment after the bronchoalveolar lavage.
| Characteristics | MAC patients | P value | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| All | Stable* | Deteriorated† | Stable vs. Deterioration | |
| Age(y), median[min-max] | 67[45–78] | 67[50–78] | 57[45–76] | 0.12 |
| Sex (M/F) | 4/18 | 2/13 | 2/5 | 0.78 |
| Cigarette smoking status | ||||
| Current/Former/Never | 0/4/18 | 0/2/13 | 0/2/5 | 0.78 |
| MAC strain | ||||
| | 20 | 13 | 7 | 0.95 |
| | 2 | 2 | 0 | |
Definition of stable and deteriorated group were described in Material and Methods. Data are presented as the number of subjects except median age.
Local immunological status and disease progression after bronchoalveolar lavage in subjects who were followed-up without treatment.
| MAC patients | P value | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Stable | Deteriorated | ||
| Total cell count (x104/ml) | 26.4 ± 7.0 | 43.5 ± 25.3 | 0.39 |
| Neutrophils (%) | 7.4 ± 4.4 | 31.1 ± 13.2 | 0.04 |
| Neutrophils (x104/ml) | 5.3 ± 4.5 | 29.6 ±22.1 | 0.15 |
| Lymphocytes (%) | 20.3 ± 4.3 | 17.9 ± 8.6 | 0.78 |
| Lymphocytes (x104/ml) | 5.9 ± 2.0 | 3.5 ± 1.4 | 0.46 |
| CD4+ T cells (x104/ml) | 4.4 ± 1.5 | 2.8 ± 1.2 | 0.49 |
| CD8+ T cells (x104/ml) | 1.3 ± 0.5 | 0.6 ± 0.2 | 0.34 |
| CD4/CD8 ratio | 4.4 ± 0.8 | 4.6 ± 0.7 | 0.88 |
| Number of subjects | |||
| Lymphocyte-dominant (LD) | 14 | 2 | 0.0043 |
| Neutrophil-dominant (ND) | 1 | 5 | |
Definition of stable and deteriorated group were described in Material and Methods. Date are presented by mean ± SEM.
‡Fisher’s exact test
HRCT scores of the lavaged pulmonary segment at baseline who were followed-up without treatment after the bronchoalveolar lavage.
| MAC patients | P value | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Stable | Deteriorated | ||
| Severity of bronchiectasis | 0.67 ± 0.13 | 1.29 ± 0.29 | 0.03 |
| Severity of bronchial wall thickening | 0.47 ± 0.13 | 1.14 ± 0.26 | 0.02 |
| Extent of bronchiectasis | 0.67 ± 0.13 | 2.14 ± 0.34 | <0.001 |
| Extent of multiple nodules or small nodules | 0.87 ± 0.10 | 1.71 ± 0.42 | 0.01 |
| Sacculations or abscesses | 0.27 ± 0.08 | 0.86 ± 0.20 | 0.03 |
| Extent of mosaic perfusion | 0.07 ± 0.07 | 0 ± 0 | 0.51 |
| Collapse or consolidation | 0.20 ± 0.15 | 0.43 ± 0.2 | 0.38 |
| Segment score | 3.2 ± 0.55 | 7.57 ± 1.45 | 0.003 |
Data are represented as mean ± SEM. LD; Lymphocyte-dominant group, ND; Neutrophil-dominant group, HRCT; high-resolution computed tomography.