Thomas Schachtner1,2,3, Natalie M Otto1, Maik Stein2, Petra Reinke1,2. 1. Department of Nephrology and Internal Intensive Care, Charité University Medicine Berlin, Campus Virchow Clinic, Berlin, Germany. 2. Berlin-Brandenburg Center of Regenerative Therapies (BCRT), Berlin, Germany. 3. Berlin Institute of Health (BIH)-Charité and Max-Delbrück Center, Berlin, Germany.
Abstract
Background: The number of kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) being waitlisted for a subsequent transplantation has disproportionately increased to almost 25%. Evidence for the optimal management of the failed allograft, however, remains inconsistent. Methods: We studied 111 KTRs who underwent their second kidney transplantation from 1998 to 2015. In 51/111 KTRs (46%) the failed allograft was removed and in 60/111 (54%) the failed allograft was retained. KTRs with primary non-function and allograft loss <12 months of the first failed allograft were excluded from analysis. Samples were collected before transplantation and at 1 month posttransplantation and donor-reactive T cells were measured using an interferon-γ enzyme-linked immunosorbent spot assay. Results: KTRs with the previous allograft removed showed significantly higher rates of acute cellular rejection compared with KTRs with the previous allograft retained [27/51 KTRs (53%) versus 18/60 KTRs (30%); P = 0.019]. KTRs with the previous allograft removed showed significantly inferior death-censored allograft survival compared with KTRs with the previous allograft retained (P = 0.022). Here, KTRs with the previous allograft removed showed significantly higher donor-reactive T cells pretransplantation compared with KTRs with the previous allograft retained (P = 0.012). Interestingly, no differences were observed for the presence of panel reactive antibodies and for the development of de novo donor-specific antibodies. Conclusions: Our data suggest higher cellular presensitization among KTRs with the previous allograft removed, which is associated with higher rates of acute cellular rejection and inferior allograft survival. Immunological mechanisms that may account for these differences may include prolonged maintenance immunosuppression to save urine output in KTRs with the first kidney allograft retained and cellular presensitization after withdrawal of maintenance immunosuppression, which lead to allograft rejection and ultimately to allograft nephrectomy.
Background: The number of kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) being waitlisted for a subsequent transplantation has disproportionately increased to almost 25%. Evidence for the optimal management of the failed allograft, however, remains inconsistent. Methods: We studied 111 KTRs who underwent their second kidney transplantation from 1998 to 2015. In 51/111 KTRs (46%) the failed allograft was removed and in 60/111 (54%) the failed allograft was retained. KTRs with primary non-function and allograft loss <12 months of the first failed allograft were excluded from analysis. Samples were collected before transplantation and at 1 month posttransplantation and donor-reactive T cells were measured using an interferon-γ enzyme-linked immunosorbent spot assay. Results: KTRs with the previous allograft removed showed significantly higher rates of acute cellular rejection compared with KTRs with the previous allograft retained [27/51 KTRs (53%) versus 18/60 KTRs (30%); P = 0.019]. KTRs with the previous allograft removed showed significantly inferior death-censored allograft survival compared with KTRs with the previous allograft retained (P = 0.022). Here, KTRs with the previous allograft removed showed significantly higher donor-reactive T cells pretransplantation compared with KTRs with the previous allograft retained (P = 0.012). Interestingly, no differences were observed for the presence of panel reactive antibodies and for the development of de novo donor-specific antibodies. Conclusions: Our data suggest higher cellular presensitization among KTRs with the previous allograft removed, which is associated with higher rates of acute cellular rejection and inferior allograft survival. Immunological mechanisms that may account for these differences may include prolonged maintenance immunosuppression to save urine output in KTRs with the first kidney allograft retained and cellular presensitization after withdrawal of maintenance immunosuppression, which lead to allograft rejection and ultimately to allograft nephrectomy.
Authors: Ekaterina Lezoeva; Jakob Nilsson; Rudolf Wüthrich; Thomas F Mueller; Thomas Schachtner Journal: Front Immunol Date: 2022-02-18 Impact factor: 7.561
Authors: Anke Schwarz; Frank Schäfer; Theodor Framke; Silvia Linnenweber-Held; Nicolas Richter; Hermann Haller Journal: Ann Transplant Date: 2021-07-16 Impact factor: 1.530