Literature DB >> 29401089

Biomechanical Comparison of 3 Inferiorly Directed Versus 3 Superiorly Directed Locking Screws on Stability in a 3-Part Proximal Humerus Fracture Model.

David M Donohue1, Brandon G Santoni2, T Kyle Stoops2, Gregory Tanner, Miguel A Diaz2, Mark Mighell3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To quantify the stability of 3 points of inferiorly directed versus 3 points of superiorly directed locking screw fixation compared with the full contingent of 6 points of locked screw fixation in the treatment of a 3-part proximal humerus fracture.
METHODS: A standardized 3-part fracture was created in 10 matched pairs (experimental groups) and 10 nonmatched humeri (control group). Osteosynthesis was performed using 3 locking screws in the superior hemisphere of the humeral head (suspension), 3 locking screws in the inferior hemisphere (buttress), or the full complement of 6 locking screws (control). Specimens were tested in varus cantilever bending (7.5 Nm) to 10,000 cycles or failure. Construct survival (%) and the cycles to failure were compared.
RESULTS: Seven of 10 controls survived the 10,000-cycle runout (70%: 8193 average cycles to failure). No experimental constructs survived the 10,000-cycle runout. Suspension and buttress screw groups failed an average of 331 and 516 cycles, respectively (P = 1.00). The average number of cycles to failure and the number of humeri surviving the 10,000-cycle runout were greater in the control group than in the experimental groups (P ≤ 0.006).
CONCLUSION: Data support the use of a full contingent of 6 points of locking screw fixation over 3 superior or 3 inferior points of fixation in the treatment of a 3-part proximal humerus fracture with a locking construct. No biomechanical advantage to the 3 buttress or 3 suspension screws used in isolation was observed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29401089     DOI: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000001112

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Trauma        ISSN: 0890-5339            Impact factor:   2.512


  3 in total

1.  Factors associated with maintaining reduction following locking plate fixation of proximal humerus fractures: a population-based retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Martin Bouliane; Anelise Silveira; AlJarrah AlEidan; Luke Heinrichs; Sung Hyun Kang; David M Sheps; Lauren Beaupre
Journal:  JSES Int       Date:  2020-09-09

2.  MRI evaluation of axillary neurovascular bundle: Implications for minimally invasive proximal humerus fracture fixation.

Authors:  Eric B Wilkinson; Johnathan F Williams; Kyle D Paul; Jun Kit He; Justin R Hutto; Carl A Narducci; Gerald McGwin; Eugene W Brabston; Brent A Ponce
Journal:  JSES Int       Date:  2021-01-09

3.  How Many Proximal Screws Are Needed for a Stable Proximal Humerus Fracture Fixation?

Authors:  Hyojune Kim; Myung Jin Shin; Erica Kholinne; Janghyeon Seo; Duckwoo Ahn; Ji Wan Kim; Kyoung Hwan Koh
Journal:  Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil       Date:  2021-02-09
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.