Literature DB >> 29400657

National trends, predictors of use, and in-hospital outcomes in mechanical circulatory support for cardiogenic shock.

Jordan B Strom1, Yuansong Zhao, Changyu Shen, Mabel Chung, Duane S Pinto, Jeffrey J Popma, Robert W Yeh.   

Abstract

AIMS: Despite rising rates of cardiogenic shock (CS), data on trends and in-hospital outcomes of short-term non-durable mechanical circulatory support (MCS) are limited. Thus, we aimed to identify recent national trends in MCS utilisation in the USA, patient-level predictors of MCS use, and in-hospital outcomes in CS inclusive of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). METHODS AND
RESULTS: Hospitalisations of US adults with a discharge diagnosis of CS, from January 2004 to December 2014, in the National Inpatient Sample were included. Rates of MCS were stratified by device type and clinical presentation. Outcomes included in-hospital mortality, hospitalisation costs, and number of procedures. A total of 183,516 hospitalisations with CS (47,636 [25.9%] involving MCS) were included. MCS recipients were younger, less frequently female, received more procedures, had higher costs, and more frequently presented with MI (MCS vs. non-MCS: 71.6% vs. 42.9%; p<0.0001). Growth in CS hospitalisations (214.4%) outpaced annual MCS use (160.0%), with relative declines in intra-aortic balloon pump use starting in 2008. Right heart catheterisation rates for both groups remained low (MCS vs. non-MCS: 5.9% vs. 3.3%; p<0.0001). In-hospital mortality declined but remained high in both groups (MCS vs. non-MCS [2014]: 32.7% vs. 41.5%; p<0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS: In-hospital mortality for CS has declined but remains high. Rates of CS have outpaced MCS utilisation which remains uncommon in non-MI hospitalisations with shock. MCS is associated with utilisation of other procedures during hospitalisation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29400657     DOI: 10.4244/EIJ-D-17-00947

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  EuroIntervention        ISSN: 1774-024X            Impact factor:   6.534


  16 in total

Review 1.  Mechanical Circulatory Support: a Comprehensive Review With a Focus on Women.

Authors:  Manal Alasnag; Alexander G Truesdell; Holli Williams; Sara C Martinez; Syeda Kashfi Qadri; John P Skendelas; William A Jakobleff; Mirvat Alasnag
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2020-04-23       Impact factor: 5.113

2.  Clinical Practice Patterns in Temporary Mechanical Circulatory Support for Shock in the Critical Care Cardiology Trials Network (CCCTN) Registry.

Authors:  David D Berg; Christopher F Barnett; Benjamin B Kenigsberg; Alexander Papolos; Carlos L Alviar; Vivian M Baird-Zars; Gregory W Barsness; Erin A Bohula; Joseph Brennan; James A Burke; Anthony P Carnicelli; Sunit-Preet Chaudhry; Paul C Cremer; Lori B Daniels; Andrew P DeFilippis; Daniel A Gerber; Christopher B Granger; Steven Hollenberg; James M Horowitz; James D Gladden; Jason N Katz; Ellen C Keeley; Norma Keller; Michael C Kontos; Patrick R Lawler; Venu Menon; Thomas S Metkus; P Elliott Miller; Jose Nativi-Nicolau; L Kristin Newby; Jeong-Gun Park; Nicholas Phreaner; Robert O Roswell; Steven P Schulman; Shashank S Sinha; R Jeffrey Snell; Michael A Solomon; Jeffrey J Teuteberg; Wayne Tymchak; Sean van Diepen; David A Morrow
Journal:  Circ Heart Fail       Date:  2019-11-11       Impact factor: 8.790

3.  The tightrope walk between temporary and permanent mechanical circulatory support.

Authors:  L Christian Napp; Maximilian Halbe; Federico Pappalardo
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 2.895

4.  Resources for cardiovascular healthcare associated with 30-day mortality in acute myocardial infarction with cardiogenic shock.

Authors:  Masanobu Ishii; Kenichi Tsujita; Hiroshi Okamoto; Satoshi Koto; Takeshi Nishi; Michikazu Nakai; Yoko Sumita; Yoshitaka Iwanaga; Nobuyoshi Azuma; Satoaki Matoba; Ken-Ichi Hirata; Yutaka Hikichi; Hiroyoshi Yokoi; Yuji Ikari; Shiro Uemura
Journal:  Eur Heart J Open       Date:  2021-12-31

5.  Outcomes Associated With Peripheral Artery Disease in Myocardial Infarction With Cardiogenic Shock.

Authors:  Nino Mihatov; Ramya C Mosarla; Ajay J Kirtane; Sahil A Parikh; Kenneth Rosenfield; Siyan Chen; Yang Song; Robert W Yeh; Eric A Secemsky
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2022-04-05       Impact factor: 27.203

6.  Hospital Variation in the Utilization of Short-Term Nondurable Mechanical Circulatory Support in Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock.

Authors:  Jordan B Strom; Yuansong Zhao; Changyu Shen; Mabel Chung; Duane S Pinto; Jeffrey J Popma; David J Cohen; Robert W Yeh
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 6.546

7.  Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Use in Acute Myocardial Infarction in the United States, 2000 to 2014.

Authors:  Saraschandra Vallabhajosyula; Abhiram Prasad; Malcolm R Bell; Gurpreet S Sandhu; Mackram F Eleid; Shannon M Dunlay; Gregory J Schears; John M Stulak; Mandeep Singh; Bernard J Gersh; Allan S Jaffe; David R Holmes; Charanjit S Rihal; Gregory W Barsness
Journal:  Circ Heart Fail       Date:  2019-12-12       Impact factor: 8.790

8.  Prognostic Impact of Active Mechanical Circulatory Support in Cardiogenic Shock Complicating Acute Myocardial Infarction, Results from the Culprit-Shock Trial.

Authors:  Hans-Josef Feistritzer; Steffen Desch; Anne Freund; Janine Poess; Uwe Zeymer; Taoufik Ouarrak; Steffen Schneider; Suzanne de Waha-Thiele; Georg Fuernau; Ingo Eitel; Marko Noc; Janina Stepinska; Kurt Huber; Holger Thiele
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2020-06-24       Impact factor: 4.241

9.  Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation for Cardiac Indications in Adults: A Health Technology Assessment.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2020-03-06

Review 10.  Mechanical circulatory support in acute myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock: Challenges and importance of randomized control trials.

Authors:  Mir B Basir; Duane S Pinto; Boback Ziaeian; Akshay Khandelwal; Jennifer Cowger; William Suh; Andrew Althouse
Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2021-03-07       Impact factor: 2.692

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.