Literature DB >> 29400656

Outcome after revascularisation of acute myocardial infarction with cardiogenic shock on extracorporeal life support.

Pavel Overtchouk1, Julien Pascal, Guillaume Lebreton, Jean-Sebastien Hulot, Charles-Edouard Luyt, Alain Combes, Mathieu Kerneis, Johanne Silvain, Olvier Barthelemy, Pascal Leprince, Nicolas Brechot, Gilles Montalescot, Jean-Philippe Collet.   

Abstract

AIMS: The aim of the study was to identify independent correlates of survival in patients undergoing PCI for refractory cardiogenic shock due to myocardial infarction (RCS-MI) with the need for extracorporeal life support (ECLS). METHODS AND
RESULTS: This observational single tertiary centre study enrolled 106 consecutive patients (52.7±10.4 years) with ECLS placed before or after the PCI. Half of the patients had triple vessel disease and PCI was attempted whenever possible (74.5%). The 30-day mortality rate was 63.2%. Left main culprit vessel disease (19% of patients) (adj. HR [95% CI]: 2.31 [1.27-4.18], p=0.006) and sepsis-related organ failure assessment ≥13 (adj. HR 2.17 [1.25-3.75], p=0.005) were independently associated with 30-day mortality. The use of intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) combined with ECLS was an independent protective factor (adj. HR 0.48 [0.28-0.80], p=0.006). Neither complete (p=0.66) nor successful (p=0.69) myocardial revascularisation was associated with 30-day survival.
CONCLUSIONS: RCS in MI patients often reveals a severe multivessel coronary artery disease with no impact of early percutaneous coronary revascularisation on clinical outcome. The survival advantage of IABP when combined with ECLS further suggests that achieving an early effective haemodynamic support should be the major goal in this young patient population.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29400656     DOI: 10.4244/EIJ-D-17-01014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  EuroIntervention        ISSN: 1774-024X            Impact factor:   6.534


  4 in total

Review 1.  Contemporary device management of cardiogenic shock following acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Tariq Suleiman; Alexander Scott; David Tong; Vikram Khanna; Vijay Kunadian
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2021-03-03       Impact factor: 4.214

2.  Protracted aortic valve closure during peripheral veno-arterial extracorporeal life support: is intra-aortic balloon pump an effective solution?

Authors:  Paolo Meani; Thijs Delnoij; Giuseppe M Raffa; Nuccia Morici; Giovanna Viola; Alice Sacco; Fabrizio Oliva; Sam Heuts; Jan-Willem Sels; Rob Driessen; Paul Roekaerts; Martijn Gilbers; Elham Bidar; Rick Schreurs; Ehsan Natour; Leo Veenstra; Suzanne Kats; Jos Maessen; Roberto Lorusso
Journal:  Perfusion       Date:  2018-07-19       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Outcome of Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Combined with Intraaortic Balloon Pump Hemodynamic Support during the Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Process for Patients with Cardiac Shock Complicating Acute Myocardial Infarction.

Authors:  Minghua Luo; Jing Zhou; Chengjie Qiu; He Wang; Huaimin Guan; Yida Tang; Yushan Chen; Jinhong Xie; Yonghua Zong; Wenjie Dong; Shasha Shang; Gang Liu; Chunying Si
Journal:  J Healthc Eng       Date:  2022-03-07       Impact factor: 2.682

4.  Outcomes of Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Plus Intra-Aortic Balloon Pumping for Treatment of Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock.

Authors:  Takeshi Nishi; Masanobu Ishii; Kenichi Tsujita; Hiroshi Okamoto; Satoshi Koto; Michikazu Nakai; Yoko Sumita; Yoshitaka Iwanaga; Satoaki Matoba; Yoshio Kobayashi; Ken-Ichi Hirata; Yutaka Hikichi; Hiroyoshi Yokoi; Yuji Ikari; Shiro Uemura
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2022-04-04       Impact factor: 6.106

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.