Daniel V Runco1, Cassandra D Josephson1,2, Sunil S Raikar1, Kelly C Goldsmith1, Glen Lew1, Melinda Pauly1, Ross M Fasano2. 1. Aflac Cancer and Blood Disorders Center at Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, Emory University School of Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Division of Hematology/Oncology/BMT, Atlanta, Georgia. 2. Center for Transfusion and Cellular Therapies, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Hyperleukocytosis is a serious, life-threatening complication of pediatric acute leukemia that can cause neurologic injury, pulmonary leukostasis, metabolic derangements, and coagulopathy. Acute leukemia has the highest risk of mortality and morbidity at presentation when associated with hyperleukocytosis. Infant leukemia presents unique challenges and treatment considerations due to the disease itself and size and overall health of the patient. While medical management of hyperleukocytosis in older patients with acute leukemia has been described, including cytoreductive procedures with automated leukapheresis (AL) or manual whole blood (WB) exchange transfusion, very little data exist for standardized management of hyperleukocytosis in infant leukemia patients. CASE REPORTS: We describe four cases of infant acute leukemia presenting with hyperleukocytosis and leukostasis who each received manual WB exchange transfusions in conjunction with induction chemotherapy and review the existing literature on the use of procedural leukoreduction in infants with hyperleukocytosis. Special attention is given to challenges and technical aspects of leukapheresis in infants: when to perform manual WB exchange versus AL, optimal vascular access, blood product selection, exchange rates, and the monitoring for complications. Using published cases, we outline benefits versus risks of manual WB exchange and AL in infants less than 10 kg. CONCLUSION: If providers perform procedural leukoreduction, the literature and our experience demonstrate manual WB exchange transfusion is favored over AL in infants less than 10 kg because of technical and complication risks associated with AL. Additional studies are needed to understand the impact of cytoreduction on long-term outcomes.
BACKGROUND: Hyperleukocytosis is a serious, life-threatening complication of pediatric acute leukemia that can cause neurologic injury, pulmonary leukostasis, metabolic derangements, and coagulopathy. Acute leukemia has the highest risk of mortality and morbidity at presentation when associated with hyperleukocytosis. Infantleukemia presents unique challenges and treatment considerations due to the disease itself and size and overall health of the patient. While medical management of hyperleukocytosis in older patients with acute leukemia has been described, including cytoreductive procedures with automated leukapheresis (AL) or manual whole blood (WB) exchange transfusion, very little data exist for standardized management of hyperleukocytosis in infant leukemiapatients. CASE REPORTS: We describe four cases of infantacute leukemia presenting with hyperleukocytosis and leukostasis who each received manual WB exchange transfusions in conjunction with induction chemotherapy and review the existing literature on the use of procedural leukoreduction in infants with hyperleukocytosis. Special attention is given to challenges and technical aspects of leukapheresis in infants: when to perform manual WB exchange versus AL, optimal vascular access, blood product selection, exchange rates, and the monitoring for complications. Using published cases, we outline benefits versus risks of manual WB exchange and AL in infants less than 10 kg. CONCLUSION: If providers perform procedural leukoreduction, the literature and our experience demonstrate manual WB exchange transfusion is favored over AL in infants less than 10 kg because of technical and complication risks associated with AL. Additional studies are needed to understand the impact of cytoreduction on long-term outcomes.
Authors: Susan E Wiedmeier; Timothy M Bahr; Robin K Ohls; Thomas R Christensen; Vickie L Baer; Sarah J Ilstrup; Kelly Cail; Robert D Christensen Journal: J Perinatol Date: 2020-07-15 Impact factor: 2.521
Authors: Aleksandra Milaszewska; Beth Hanselman; Gary Kwok Cheong Lee; R Darren Wood; Anthony Abrams Ogg Journal: Can Vet J Date: 2022-05 Impact factor: 1.075
Authors: Dalia L Lezzar; Fong W Lam; Ravin Huerta; Anton Mukhamedshin; Madeleine Lu; Sergey S Shevkoplyas Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2022-08-13 Impact factor: 4.996