| Literature DB >> 29399453 |
Graham Tytherleigh-Strong1, Lee Van Rensburg1.
Abstract
Osteoarthritis changes at the sternoclavicular joint (SCJ) have been shown to be present on computed tomography in more than 90% of people over the age of 60 years. Although usually asymptomatic, when symptoms do occur, they can be very debilitating. Most patients respond favorably to conservative treatment, but there is a small cohort of patients who continue to be symptomatic despite adequate conservative treatment. Surgical management with an open SCJ excision has been shown to give satisfactory results. However, probably due to concerns with regard to damage to the mediastinal structures, instability, and scarring, there is a high threshold for surgery. Arthroscopic SCJ excision has been shown to achieve similar results to an open procedure while avoiding some of the risks. In this Technical Note, we describe the indications, imaging, and the technique of an arthroscopic excision of the SCJ.Entities:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29399453 PMCID: PMC5795018 DOI: 10.1016/j.eats.2017.06.026
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Arthrosc Tech ISSN: 2212-6287
Fig 1(1) Cadaveric photograph of the medial end of the clavicle, with “A” the insertion point of the superior end of the intra-articular disk and “B” the articular cartilage. (2) “C”: Diagram of the surgical anatomy of the sternoclavicular joint (SCJ) showing the superior insertion of the intra-articular disk into the superior one-third of the medial end of the clavicle and the articular surface occupying the inferior two-thirds. (3) “D”: Black shaded box representing the area articular and subchondral bone that is resected during an arthroscopic excision of the SCJ.
Fig 2(A) Preop tomogram of a right osteoarthritic sternoclavicular joint with joint space narrowing, subchondral sclerosis, and an inferior osteophyte. (B) Postop tomogram of the same patient taken 6 weeks after surgery with the undercut excision of the subchondral bone.
Fig 3(A) Intraoperative external view photograph of a patient, positioned supine, undergoing a left arthroscopic sternoclavicular joint (SCJ) excision. The SCJ boney landmarks have been drawn out and the 18-gauge spinal needle is being inserted into the inferior joint space of the left SCJ. (B) Resection of the medial end of the clavicle is being undertaken with the arthroscope in the inferior portal and the power shaver in the superior portal.
Fig 4Intraoperative arthroscopic pictures of a left sternoclavicular joint arthroscopic excision. The arthroscope is in the inferior portal in all of the images with the shaver, radiofrequency probe, and burr in the superior portal. (A) A 3.5-mm shaver is initially used to resect the remnants of the degenerate disk and clear away any loose intra-articular soft tissue. (B) The radiofrequency probe is next used to clear any remaining soft tissue and articular cartilage from the medial end of the clavicle and to clearly expose the bone of the medial end of the clavicle, circumferentially. (C) The medial end of the clavicle has been prepared and denuded of any residual articular cartilage, the joint space has been completely cleared, and the posterior capsule and the well-preserved sternal articular surface can also be seen. (D) A 4-mm acromionizer burr has begun to resect the superior part of the medial end of the clavicle working from posterior to anterior. (E) The superior part of the medial clavicle has been resected with the inferior osteophyte at the most lateral part of the joint about to be resected by the burr. (F) At the end of the case, the articular part of the medial end of the clavicle has been completely resected circumferentially back to the edge of the capsule with the inferior part of the capsule fully exposed.
Relative Advantages and Disadvantages of Open Versus Arthroscopic Sternoclavicular Joint Excision
| Arthroscopic Excision | Open Excision | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Advantage | Disadvantage | Advantage | Disadvantage | |
| Equipment | Miniscope, instruments, shaver, and radiofrequency probe able to precisely excise the disk | Initial capital outlay and ongoing consumable costs | Standard orthopaedic and surgical instruments | Instruments insufficiently precise to excise the inferior triangular two-thirds of the medial end of the clavicle without collateral damage to the superior disk and capsular insertion |
| Visualization and access | Visualization and easy access to the whole joint | No extra-articular visualization or ability to assess and address any preoperative joint instability | Extra-articular visualization and ability to assess and address any pre-existing joint instability | Poor visualization of the posterior joint and difficult surgical access |
| Postoperative period | Day-case procedure, no sling, immediate mobilization, minimal incision scar | Potential difficulty in managing unexpected pain issues in the immediate days after surgery | Patient remains in hospital, allowing easier adjustment of medication to address any unexpected anesthetic or pain issues | Inpatient procedure, sling required, 4-6 wk of immobilization. Prominent incision scar |
| Risks and complications | Minimal risk to joint stability, minimal risk to posterior vascular structures, minimal risk of infection | Potential risk of joint instability, potential risk of infection | ||
| Surgeon requirements | Advanced arthroscopic experience, high-volume sternoclavicular joint practice | Procedure can be undertaken by a competent and experienced upper limb surgeon | ||