Daniel M Siegel1,2,3,4,5, Stephen Tyring1,2,3,4,5, Walter K Nahm1,2,3,4,5, Marie Louise Østerdal1,2,3,4,5, Astrid H Petersen1,2,3,4,5, Brian Berman1,2,3,4,5. 1. Dr. Siegel is with Long Island Skin Cancer and Dermatologic Surgery in New York, New York. 2. Dr. Tyring is with the Center for Clinical Studies in Houston, Texas. 3. Dr. Nahm is with University Clinical Trials, Inc. and the University of California School of Medicine, San Diego in San Diego, California. 4. Dr. Petersen and Ms. Østerdal are with LEO Pharma AS in Ballerup, Denmark. 5. Dr. Berman is with the Center for Clinical and Cosmetic Research in Aventura, Florida.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of ingenol disoxate gel using a once-daily, three-day field treatment regimen in patients with actinic keratosis. DESIGN: This was a Phase II, multicenter, open-label trial (clinicaltrials.gov: NCT02305888). SETTING: The study was conducted in 20 trial sites in the United States. PARTICIPANTS: Participants included patients with 5 to 20 clinically typical actinic keratosis lesions on the full face/chest (250cm2), scalp (25-250cm2), or the trunk/extremities (250cm2). MEASUREMENTS: We measured incidence of dose-limiting events based on local skin responses. Percentage reduction in actinic keratosis lesion count from baseline, complete clearance, and partial clearance (≥75%) of actinic keratosis lesions were assessed at Week 8. RESULTS: Nine of 63 (14.3%) patients in the face/chest group reported dose-limiting events; zero of 63 patients in the scalp group reported dose-limiting events; and 11 of 62 (17.7%) patients in the trunk/extremities group reported dose-limiting events. Mean composite local skin response scores peaked at Day 4, then rapidly declined, reaching or approaching baseline levels by Week 4. Less than five percent of patients reported severe adverse events; the most common treatment-related adverse events were application site pain and pruritus. The reduction in actinic keratosis lesion count was 78.9, 76.3, and 69.1 percent for the face/chest, scalp, and trunk/extremities groups, respectively. Complete clearance was achieved in 36.5, 39.7, and 22.6 percent of patients in the face/chest, scalp, and trunk/extremities groups, respectively. Partial clearance was achieved in 71.4, 65.1, and 50.0 percent of patients in the face/chest, scalp, and trunk/extremities groups, respectively. CONCLUSION: Ingenol disoxate demonstrated adverse events and local skin reaction profiles similar to results seen in trials evaluating shorter two-day regimens and was effective in patients with actinic keratosis. These data support the use of ingenol disoxate gel for actinic keratosis field treatment.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of ingenol disoxate gel using a once-daily, three-day field treatment regimen in patients with actinic keratosis. DESIGN: This was a Phase II, multicenter, open-label trial (clinicaltrials.gov: NCT02305888). SETTING: The study was conducted in 20 trial sites in the United States. PARTICIPANTS: Participants included patients with 5 to 20 clinically typical actinic keratosis lesions on the full face/chest (250cm2), scalp (25-250cm2), or the trunk/extremities (250cm2). MEASUREMENTS: We measured incidence of dose-limiting events based on local skin responses. Percentage reduction in actinic keratosis lesion count from baseline, complete clearance, and partial clearance (≥75%) of actinic keratosis lesions were assessed at Week 8. RESULTS: Nine of 63 (14.3%) patients in the face/chest group reported dose-limiting events; zero of 63 patients in the scalp group reported dose-limiting events; and 11 of 62 (17.7%) patients in the trunk/extremities group reported dose-limiting events. Mean composite local skin response scores peaked at Day 4, then rapidly declined, reaching or approaching baseline levels by Week 4. Less than five percent of patients reported severe adverse events; the most common treatment-related adverse events were application site pain and pruritus. The reduction in actinic keratosis lesion count was 78.9, 76.3, and 69.1 percent for the face/chest, scalp, and trunk/extremities groups, respectively. Complete clearance was achieved in 36.5, 39.7, and 22.6 percent of patients in the face/chest, scalp, and trunk/extremities groups, respectively. Partial clearance was achieved in 71.4, 65.1, and 50.0 percent of patients in the face/chest, scalp, and trunk/extremities groups, respectively. CONCLUSION:Ingenol disoxate demonstrated adverse events and local skin reaction profiles similar to results seen in trials evaluating shorter two-day regimens and was effective in patients with actinic keratosis. These data support the use of ingenol disoxate gel for actinic keratosis field treatment.
Entities:
Keywords:
Actinic keratosis; efficacy; field treatment; ingenol disoxate; safety
Authors: Marc Bourcier; Linda Stein Gold; Lyn Guenther; Camilla M Andreassen; Johan Selmer; Gary Goldenberg Journal: J Dermatolog Treat Date: 2017-04-04 Impact factor: 3.359
Authors: M T Fernández-Figueras; C Carrato; X Sáenz; L Puig; E Musulen; C Ferrándiz; A Ariza Journal: J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol Date: 2014-11-26 Impact factor: 6.166
Authors: Mark Lebwohl; Neil Swanson; Lawrence L Anderson; Anita Melgaard; Zhenyi Xu; Brian Berman Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2012-03-15 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: S Sinnya; J M Tan; T W Prow; C Primiero; E McEniery; J Selmer; M L Østerdal; H P Soyer Journal: Br J Dermatol Date: 2016-01-09 Impact factor: 9.302
Authors: Ida M Heerfordt; Christoffer V Nissen; Thomas Poulsen; Peter A Philipsen; Hans Christian Wulf Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2016-09-27 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Brian Berman; Stephen Tyring; Walter K Nahm; Marie Louise Østerdal; Astrid H Petersen; Daniel M Siegel Journal: J Clin Aesthet Dermatol Date: 2017-11-01