| Literature DB >> 29399061 |
Stefania Gedrova1, Jan Galik1, Martin Marsala1,2, Monika Zavodska1, Jaroslav Pavel1, Igor Sulla5, Miroslav Gajdos4, Imrich Lukac4, Jozef Kafka4, Valent Ledecky5, Igor Sulla5, Martina Karasova5, Peter Reichel5, Alexandra Trbolova5, Igor Capik5, Viktoria Lukacova6, Katarina Bimbova1, Maria Bacova1, Andrea Stropkovska1, Nadezda Lukacova1.
Abstract
This study investigated the neuroprotective efficacy of local hypothermia in a minipig model of spinal cord injury (SCI) induced by a computer-controlled impactor device. The tissue integrity observed at the injury epicenter, and up to 3 cm cranially and caudally from the lesion site correlated with motor function. A computer-controlled device produced contusion lesions at L3 level with two different degrees of tissue sparing, depending upon pre-set impact parameters (8N- and 15N-force impact). Hypothermia with cold (4°C) saline or Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM)/F12 culture medium was applied 30 min after SCI (for 5 h) via a perfusion chamber (flow 2 ml/min). After saline hypothermia, the 8N-SCI group achieved faster recovery of hind limb function and the ability to walk from one to three steps at nine weeks in comparison with non-treated animals. Such improvements were not observed in saline-treated animals subjected to more severe 15N-SCI or in the group treated with DMEM/F12 medium. It was demonstrated that the tissue preservation in the cranial and caudal segments immediately adjacent to the lesion, and neurofilament protection in the lateral columns may be essential for modulation of the key spinal microcircuits leading to a functional outcome. Tissue sparing observed only in the caudal sections, even though significant, was not sufficient for functional improvement in the 15N-SCI model.Entities:
Keywords: 3D perfusion chamber; hindlimb function; local hypothermia; minipigs; neurofilaments; spinal cord; tissue integrity
Year: 2017 PMID: 29399061 PMCID: PMC5769223 DOI: 10.3892/etm.2017.5432
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Exp Ther Med ISSN: 1792-0981 Impact factor: 2.447
Figure 1.(A) Computer-operated compression apparatus consisting of a computer-controlled stepping motor and (B) digital force gauge bridged to a 5-mm diameter circular bar with U-shaped tip. (C) Correct localization of laminectomy was determined using plain X-rays of the lumbar vertebral column in a lateral projection.
Figure 2.Special spinal perfusion chamber implanted over the exposed spinal dural sac to allow local perfusion of injured tissue with treating solutions. (A) Closed design of the chamber was not useful due to limited contact of solution with spinal tissue, so we used (B and C) an open chamber enabling cleaning and monitoring of the spinal dural sac surface.
20-point neurological scale for minipigs.
| Scale | Description |
|---|---|
| 0 | Complete paraplegia, no movement in joints of hindlimbs, spontaneous defecation and urination |
| 1 | Slight movement in one joint (hip joint) of hindlimbs, not capable of sitting and plantar placement of hindlimbs during sitting, spontaneous defecation and urination |
| 2 | Slight movement in two joints (hip and knee joint) of hindlimbs, not capable of sitting and plantar placement of during sitting, spontaneous defecation and urination |
| 3 | Slight movement in all three joints of hindlimbs, capable of sitting on the side without plantar placement of hindlimbs during sitting, spontaneous defecation and urination |
| 4 | Extensive movement in one joint (hip joint) and slight movement in two joints of hindlimbs, capable of sitting on the side without plantar placement of hindlimbs during sitting, spontaneous defecation and urination |
| 5 | Extensive movement in twoo joints of hindlimbs and slight movement in third joint of hindlimbs, capable of straight sitting and plantar placement of hindlimbs during sitting, spontaneous defecation and urination |
| 6 | Extensive movement in all three joints of hindlimbs, capable of straight sitting and plantar placement of hindlimbs during sitting, spontaneous defecation and urination |
| 7 | Extensive movement in all three joints of hindlimbs, not capable of standing up, sweeping with one hindlimb, spontaneous defecation and urination |
| 8 | Extensive movement in all three joints of hindlimbs, not capable of standing up, sweeping with both hindlimbs, spontaneous defecation and urination |
| 9 | Sweeping with both hindlimbs, not capable of plantar hoof stepping, attempt to hold stand with initial help to stand up |
| 10 | Sweeping with both hindlimbs, capable of weigh support with plantar surface of hoof with initial help to stand up only, not capable of walking |
| 11 | Capable to stand up itself, not capable to maintain balance, walking with support only (falling back on wall), position only on dorsal surface of hoof |
| 12 | Capable to stand up itself on hindlimbs and capable standing, able to walk 1–3 steps with occasional support without forelimb-hindlimb coordination, occasional plantar-hoof stepping |
| 13 | Capable of standing up spontaneously and able to take 1–3 steps without support before losing balance, no forelimb-hindlimb coordination, frequent plantar-hoof stepping and capable to keep balance between stepping episodes |
| 14 | Capable of standing up spontaneously and able to take 3–5 steps, capable to keep balance between stepping episodes with occasional support only, no forelimb-hindlimb coorination, occasional to frequent plantar-hoof stepping |
| 15 | Capable of standing up spontaneously and able to take 3–5 steps, capable to keep balance between stepping episodes, frequent plantar-hoof stepping, no forelimb-hindlimb coorination |
| 16 | Capable of standing up spontaneously and able to take 5–10 steps, capable to keep balance, frequent plantar-hoof stepping, no or inconsistent forelimb-hindlimb coordination |
| 17 | Capable of standing up spontaneously and able to take 5–10 steps, capable to keep balance, frequent plantar-hoof stepping, occasional forelimb-hindlimb coordination |
| 18 | Capable of standing up spontaneously and able to take 5–10 steps, capable to keep balance, frequent plantar-hoof stepping, frequent forelimb-hindlimb coordination |
| 19 | Capable of standing up spontaneously and able to take more than 10 steps, capable to keep balance, consistent plantar-hoof stepping, frequent forelimb-hindlimb coordination |
| 20 | Capable of standing up and walking spontaneously, consistent plantar-hoof stepping, consistent forelimb-hindlimb coordination |
Scale 1–8, the movement of hindlimbs in each individual joint; scale 9–11, the ability to stand up; scale 12–20, the ability to walk.
Figure 3.Representative pictures of the porcine behavioral scoring system (points 0–20). (A) Points 1–8 represent the movement of hind limbs in each individual joint. (B) Points 9–11 represent hind-limb sweeping and the animal's ability to stand up by itself. (C) Points 12–20 represent the ability to walk. The neurological scale for minipigs is described in detail in Table I.
Figure 4.Representative picture of the spinal cord showing localization of three areas of interest taken for quantitative analysis of neurofilaments.
Figure 5.Graph representing motor function recovery analyzed in control animals and those after L3 spinal cord compression (8N force impact; 15N force impact) using the porcine behavioral scale (0, complete paraplegia with loss of hind-limb movements; 20, normal ambulation and balance) during nine weeks of survival. Kruskall-Wallis testing revealed statistically significant differences between control and spinal cord compression groups (*P<0.05). Data are given as means ± SEM (n=3 in control group, n=4 in SCI groups). SCI, spinal cord injury.
Figure 6.Locomotor function recovery assessed using a 20-point porcine scale in minipigs after undergoing L3 spinal cord compression (force 8N in A; force 15N in B) and treatment with local hypothermia (saline or oxygenated culture medium DMEM/F12 in A; saline in B). All experimental animals survived for nine weeks. Data are given as means ± SEM (n=3–7).
Figure 7.Microphotographs showing neurofilament immunoreactivity in the dorsal, lateral and ventral columns of the lumbar spinal cord (segment −1). Spinal sections were taken from the control group, the group with 8N-force impact injury and the group treated with local hypothermia with saline or porcine medium DMEM/F12 for 5 h after spinal cord injury. Scale bar=100 µm.
Figure 8.Graph representing the number of neurofilaments (expressed as percentage of NF/mm2) in three areas of interest (dorsal, lateral and ventral columns) in control animals, those after spinal cord compression (8N force impact) and treatment with cold saline or cold porcine medium DMEM/F12. All experimental animals survived for nine weeks. Asterisks indicate significant differences between control and spinal cord compression groups without treatment (*P<0.05). The sharp symbols indicate significant differences between treated and untreated animals (#P<0.05). Data are given as means ± SEM (n=3–4).
Figure 9.Number of neurofilaments (expressed as percentage of NF/mm2) in the dorsal, lateral and ventral columns in control animals, those after spinal cord compression (15N force impact) and treatment with cold saline. All experimental animals survived for nine weeks. Asterisks indicate significant differences between control and spinal cord compression groups without treatment (*P<0.05). The sharp symbols indicate significant differences between treated and untreated animals (#P<0.05). Data are given as means ± SEM (n=3–7).
Figure 10.Transverse spinal cord sections taken from the epicenter of injury and caudal segments (−1) after L3 compression (8N and 15N force impact) and treatment with cold saline (5 h). Animals after SCI and hypothermia survived for nine weeks. Histological sections processed with Luxol fast blue and cresyl violet showed substantial reduction of cavity size at the lesion site and caudally to the epicenter of injury after SCI (8N impact force)+local hypothermia. SCI (15N impact force) and local hypothermia with saline show only partial white and gray matter preservation. Scale bar, 1,000 µm.
Figure 11.Quantitative analysis of gray matter preservation performed on transverse sections dyed with Luxol fast blue and cresyl violet staining. The percentage of preserved gray matter was calculated in the control group, in animals with 8N and 15N force spinal cord injury and after treatment with cold saline or oxygenated culture medium DMEM/F12. Experimental animals survived for nine weeks. Asterisks indicate significant differences between control and spinal cord compression groups without treatment (*P<0.05). The sharp symbols indicate significant differences between treated and untreated animals (#P<0.05). Data are given as mean ± SEM (n=3–7).
Figure 12.Analysis of preserved white matter in three areas of interest (dorsal, lateral and ventral columns). The percentage of preserved white matter was calculated in control animals, in the group after spinal cord injury (8N force impact) and in the group after injury and treatment with cold saline or oxygenated culture medium DMEM/F12. Experimental animals survived for nine weeks. Asterisks indicate significant differences between control and spinal cord compression groups without treatment (*P<0.05). The sharp symbols indicate significant differences between treated and untreated animals (#P<0.05). Data are given as means ± SEM (n=3–7).
Figure 13.Analysis of preserved white matter in three areas of interest (dorsal, lateral and ventral columns). The percentage of preserved white matter was calculated in control animals, those after spinal cord injury (15N force impact) and after treatment with cold saline. Experimental animals survived for nine weeks. Asterisks indicate significant differences between control and spinal cord compression groups without treatment (*P<0.05). The sharp symbols indicate significant differences between treated and untreated animals (#P<0.05). Data are given as means ± SEM (n=3–7).
Figure 14.Correlation coefficients (r2) between the degree of neurological recovery and neurofilament immunoreactivity, and white and gray matter preservation measured nine weeks after spinal cord injury (8N and 15N impact) and hypothermia with saline. There was a high degree of correlation with significance in gray and white matter preservation. Data are given as means ± SEM (n=11); *P<0.05 with respect to neurological outcome.
Figure 15.Plotted values show correlation coefficients (r2) between neurological score and white matter preservation analyzed in the dorsal, lateral and ventral columns nine weeks after spinal cord injury (8N and 15N force impact) and hypothermia with saline. Spinal cord was taken from the lesion site, and rostral and caudal sections. Data are given as means ± SEM (n=11); *P<0.05 neurological outcome with respect to white matter preservation.
Figure 16.Correlation between locomotor function recovery and gray matter preservation nine weeks after spinal cord injury (8N and 15N impact force) and hypothermia with saline. There were high correlation coefficients (r2) with significance between behavioral score and preserved gray matter in each spinal cord section. Data are given as means ± SEM (n=11); *P<0.05 neurological outcome with respect to gray matter preservation.