Fred K Tabung1,2, Lisa S Brown3, Teresa T Fung1,3. 1. Department of Nutrition, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health. 2. Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health. 3. Department of Nutrition, Simmons College.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a global public health problem, with an estimated 1.4 million cases diagnosed worldwide in 2012. Evidence suggests that diet may be important for primary prevention. RECENT FINDINGS: The 2017 WCRF/AICR Continuous Update Project on colorectal cancer concluded that there is convincing evidence linking several individual dietary factors with CRC risk but the evidence for dietary patterns was limited and inconclusive. Also, previous reviews and meta-analyses have not critically synthesized various dietary patterns. This review synthesized data from dietary patterns studies over a 17-year period from 2000 to 2016. SUMMARY: We included 49 studies (28 cohort and 21 case-control) that examined the association of index-based and empirically-derived dietary patterns and CRC risk. A synthesis of food group components comprising the different index-based and empirically-derived patterns revealed two distinct dietary patterns associated with CRC risk. A "healthy" pattern, generally characterized by high intake of fruits and vegetables, wholegrains, nuts and legumes, fish and other seafood, milk and other dairy products, was associated with lower CRC risk. In contrast, the "unhealthy" pattern, characterized by high intakes of red meat, processed meat, sugar-sweetened beverages, refined grains, desserts and potatoes was associated with higher CRC risk. It is notable that the number of food groups, the intake quantity, the exact types of foods in each food group, differed between populations, yet the two dietary patterns remained consistent across regions, especially in empirically-derived patterns, an indication of the high reproducibility of these patterns. However, findings for CRC risk in both index-based and empirically-derived patterns, differed by sex, with stronger associations among men than women; study design, a higher proportion of case-control studies reported significant findings compared to prospective studies. Consuming a dietary pattern high in fruits and vegetables and low in meats and sweets is protective against CRC risk. However, important questions remain about mechanisms underlying differences by sex; life-course timing of exposure to dietary patterns; interaction of dietary patterns with the microbiome or with lifestyle factors including physical activity; and elucidation of subsite differences.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a global public health problem, with an estimated 1.4 million cases diagnosed worldwide in 2012. Evidence suggests that diet may be important for primary prevention. RECENT FINDINGS: The 2017 WCRF/AICR Continuous Update Project on colorectal cancer concluded that there is convincing evidence linking several individual dietary factors with CRC risk but the evidence for dietary patterns was limited and inconclusive. Also, previous reviews and meta-analyses have not critically synthesized various dietary patterns. This review synthesized data from dietary patterns studies over a 17-year period from 2000 to 2016. SUMMARY: We included 49 studies (28 cohort and 21 case-control) that examined the association of index-based and empirically-derived dietary patterns and CRC risk. A synthesis of food group components comprising the different index-based and empirically-derived patterns revealed two distinct dietary patterns associated with CRC risk. A "healthy" pattern, generally characterized by high intake of fruits and vegetables, wholegrains, nuts and legumes, fish and other seafood, milk and other dairy products, was associated with lower CRC risk. In contrast, the "unhealthy" pattern, characterized by high intakes of red meat, processed meat, sugar-sweetened beverages, refined grains, desserts and potatoes was associated with higher CRC risk. It is notable that the number of food groups, the intake quantity, the exact types of foods in each food group, differed between populations, yet the two dietary patterns remained consistent across regions, especially in empirically-derived patterns, an indication of the high reproducibility of these patterns. However, findings for CRC risk in both index-based and empirically-derived patterns, differed by sex, with stronger associations among men than women; study design, a higher proportion of case-control studies reported significant findings compared to prospective studies. Consuming a dietary pattern high in fruits and vegetables and low in meats and sweets is protective against CRC risk. However, important questions remain about mechanisms underlying differences by sex; life-course timing of exposure to dietary patterns; interaction of dietary patterns with the microbiome or with lifestyle factors including physical activity; and elucidation of subsite differences.
Authors: Nitin Shivappa; Anna E Prizment; Cindy K Blair; David R Jacobs; Susan E Steck; James R Hébert Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2014-08-25 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Jill Reedy; Elisabet Wirfält; Andrew Flood; Panagiota N Mitrou; Susan M Krebs-Smith; Victor Kipnis; Douglas Midthune; Michael Leitzmann; Albert Hollenbeck; Arthur Schatzkin; Amy F Subar Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2009-12-21 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Teresa T Fung; Kathryn M Rexrode; Christos S Mantzoros; JoAnn E Manson; Walter C Willett; Frank B Hu Journal: Circulation Date: 2009-02-16 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Nitin Shivappa; Antonella Zucchetto; Maurizio Montella; Diego Serraino; Susan E Steck; Carlo La Vecchia; James R Hébert Journal: Br J Nutr Date: 2015-06-08 Impact factor: 3.718
Authors: Katharina Nimptsch; Vasanti S Malik; Teresa T Fung; Tobias Pischon; Frank B Hu; Walter C Willett; Charles S Fuchs; Shuji Ogino; Andrew T Chan; Edward Giovannucci; Kana Wu Journal: Int J Cancer Date: 2013-11-25 Impact factor: 7.396
Authors: Sarah J O Nomura; Chiranjeev Dash; Lynn Rosenberg; Jeffrey Yu; Julie R Palmer; Lucile L Adams-Campbell Journal: Cancer Causes Control Date: 2016-05-24 Impact factor: 2.506
Authors: Joshua Petimar; Yong-Moon Mark Park; Stephanie A Smith-Warner; Teresa T Fung; Dale P Sandler Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2019-05-01 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: Joshua Petimar; Stephanie A Smith-Warner; Bernard Rosner; Andrew T Chan; Edward L Giovannucci; Fred K Tabung Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2019-06-24 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Joshua Petimar; Stephanie A Smith-Warner; Teresa T Fung; Bernard Rosner; Andrew T Chan; Frank B Hu; Edward L Giovannucci; Fred K Tabung Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2018-11-01 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: Fred K Tabung; Edward L Giovannucci; Franco Giulianini; Liming Liang; Paulette D Chandler; Raji Balasubramanian; JoAnn E Manson; Elizabeth M Cespedes Feliciano; Kathleen M Hayden; Linda Van Horn; Kathryn M Rexrode Journal: J Nutr Date: 2018-05-01 Impact factor: 4.798
Authors: Anna J Dare; Gregory C Knapp; Anya Romanoff; Olalekan Olasehinde; Olusola C Famurewa; Akinwumi O Komolafe; Samuel Olatoke; Aba Katung; Olusegun I Alatise; T Peter Kingham Journal: Cancer Prev Res (Phila) Date: 2021-09-10
Authors: Y Yue; J Hur; Y Cao; F K Tabung; M Wang; K Wu; M Song; X Zhang; Y Liu; J A Meyerhardt; K Ng; S A Smith-Warner; W C Willett; E Giovannucci Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2021-04-01 Impact factor: 51.769