Literature DB >> 29398975

The Effects of a Delayed Incentive on Response Rates, Response Mode, Data Quality, and Sample Bias in a Nationally Representative Mixed Mode Study.

Katherine A McGonagle1, Vicki A Freedman1.   

Abstract

This article describes the results of an experiment designed to examine the impact of the use and amount of delayed unconditional incentives in a mixed mode (push to web) supplement on response rates, response mode, data quality, and sample bias. The supplement was administered to individuals who participate in the U.S. Panel Study of Income Dynamics, the longest running national household panel in the world. After 10 weeks of data collection, individuals who had not yet completed the interview were sent a final survey request and randomly assigned to one of three treatment conditions: no incentive, US$5, and US$10. The impact of the incentives on response rates and mode, effects on data quality, and sample bias are described. The implications for the use of incentives in mixed mode surveys and directions for future research are discussed.

Entities:  

Year:  2016        PMID: 29398975      PMCID: PMC5791756          DOI: 10.1177/1525822X16671701

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Field methods        ISSN: 1525-822X


  6 in total

Review 1.  Increasing response rates to postal questionnaires: systematic review.

Authors:  Phil Edwards; Ian Roberts; Mike Clarke; Carolyn DiGuiseppi; Sarah Pratap; Reinhard Wentz; Irene Kwan
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-05-18

2.  The Effects of a Between-Wave Incentive Experiment on Contact Update and Production Outcomes in a Panel Study.

Authors:  Katherine A McGonagle; Robert F Schoeni; Mick P Couper
Journal:  J Off Stat       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 0.920

3.  Effectiveness of a Time-Limited Incentive on Participation by Hard-to-Reach Respondents in a Panel Study.

Authors:  Paula Fomby; Narayan Sastry; Katherine A McGonagle
Journal:  Field methods       Date:  2016-10-13

4.  Incentives for college student participation in web-based substance use surveys.

Authors:  Megan E Patrick; Eleanor Singer; Carol J Boyd; James A Cranford; Sean Esteban McCabe
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  2012-09-04       Impact factor: 3.913

5.  The Panel Study of Income Dynamics: Overview, Recent Innovations, and Potential for Life Course Research.

Authors:  Katherine A McGonagle; Robert F Schoeni; Narayan Sastry; Vicki A Freedman
Journal:  Longit Life Course Stud       Date:  2012

6.  Response Rates in National Panel Surveys.

Authors:  Robert F Schoeni; Frank Stafford; Katherine A McGonagle; Patricia Andreski
Journal:  Ann Am Acad Pol Soc Sci       Date:  2013-01
  6 in total
  2 in total

1.  Use of a Targeted Sequential Mixed Mode Protocol in a Nationally Representative Panel Study.

Authors:  Vicki A Freedman; Katherine A McGonagle; Mick P Couper
Journal:  J Surv Stat Methodol       Date:  2017-07-06

2.  Impact of different cover letter content and incentives on non-response bias in a sample of Veterans applying for Department of Veterans Affairs disability benefits: a randomized, 3X2X2 factorial trial.

Authors:  Maureen Murdoch; Barbara A Clothier; Timothy J Beebe; Ann K Bangerter; Siamak Noorbaloochi
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2022-03-06       Impact factor: 4.615

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.