Literature DB >> 29398812

Evaluation of the Role of Novel Aprotic Dimethyl Sulfoxide in Cutaneous Antisepsis Protocols Prior to Blood Donor Phlebotomy with Isopropyl Alcohol, Povidone Iodine or Chlorhexidine.

Suchet Sachdev1, Nandini Sethuraman2, Vikas Gautam2, Deepak Pahwa1, Anuradha Kalra1, Ratti Ram Sharma1, Neelam Marwaha1, Pallab Ray2.   

Abstract

The study was planned to measure the reduction of the load of bacterial flora on the blood donor's arm quantitatively using a three step protocol of donor arm cleansing incorporating either 70% isopropyl alcohol (IPA) or 5% w/v povidone iodine (PVI, 0.5% w/v available iodine) or 4% chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG) with or without the addition of 5% dimethyl sufloxide (DMSO). Single blind randomized study after obtaining ethical clearance, using the Miles and Misra technique for quantification and matrix assisted laser desorption ionization-mass spectrometry for identification of colony morphotypes on blood donor's skin. The mean pre-cleansing colony forming units (CFUs) was 89,318 and mean post-cleansing CFUs was 132, with a mean reduction of 99.85% with a mean log reduction of 3.24 (95% CI 2.01-4.47) at a P value of <0.0001. The post-cleansing CFUs was reduced to zero in all 34 samples in the protocol using CHG with DMSO, in 23 of 31 samples in the protocol using PVI with DMSO and 19 of 29 samples in the protocol using IPA with DMSO. The difference in means of the reduction of CFUs in protocols using CHG with DMSO compared with protocols using PVI or IPA with DMSO and PVI or IPA without DMSO was statistically significant with P value of 0.006, 0.0009, 0.015 and 0.05 respectively. The enhanced cutaneous antisepsis effect of CHG when complimented with DMSO in presence of IPA using the three step protocol of donor arm cleansing could stimulate more research and utilization of this as an additional safety towards the prevention of the problem of bacterial contamination of blood and blood components.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chlorhexidine gluconate; Dimethyl sulfoxide; Isopropyl alcohol; Povidone iodine

Year:  2017        PMID: 29398812      PMCID: PMC5786613          DOI: 10.1007/s12288-017-0816-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian J Hematol Blood Transfus        ISSN: 0971-4502            Impact factor:   0.900


  21 in total

1.  Dangerous contaminants in stored blood.

Authors:  M G MCENTEGART
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1956-11-03       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  A study of bacteria implicated in transfusion reactions and of bacteria isolated from blood products.

Authors:  M PITTMAN
Journal:  J Lab Clin Med       Date:  1953-08

3.  The estimation of the bactericidal power of the blood.

Authors:  A A Miles; S S Misra; J O Irwin
Journal:  J Hyg (Lond)       Date:  1938-11

4.  Alcoholic povidone-iodine or chlorhexidine-based antiseptic for the prevention of central venous catheter-related infections: in-use comparison.

Authors:  Raphaële Girard; Christine Comby; Didier Jacques
Journal:  J Infect Public Health       Date:  2011-12-06       Impact factor: 3.718

5.  Comparison of bactericidal properties of alcohol-based chlorhexidine versus povidone-iodine prior to amniocentesis.

Authors:  Michael T Adler; Kristin R Brigger; Karen D Bishop; Joan M Mastrobattista
Journal:  Am J Perinatol       Date:  2012-03-07       Impact factor: 1.862

6.  Transfusion-transmitted bacterial infection in the United States, 1998 through 2000.

Authors:  M J Kuehnert; V R Roth; N R Haley; K R Gregory; K V Elder; G B Schreiber; M J Arduino; S C Holt; L A Carson; S N Banerjee; W R Jarvis
Journal:  Transfusion       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 3.157

7.  Evaluation of donor skin disinfection methods.

Authors:  M Goldman; G Roy; N Fréchette; F Décary; L Massicotte; G Delage
Journal:  Transfusion       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 3.157

8.  Minimizing wound contamination in a 'clean' surgery: comparison of chlorhexidine-ethanol and povidone-iodine.

Authors:  Sarath Chandra Sistla; Ganesh Prabhu; Sujatha Sistla; Jagdish Sadasivan
Journal:  Chemotherapy       Date:  2010-08-09       Impact factor: 2.544

9.  Post transfusion septicaemia 1980-1989: importance of donor arm cleansing.

Authors:  A Puckett; G Davison; C C Entwistle; J A Barbara
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 10.  Transfusion-associated bacterial sepsis.

Authors:  S J Wagner; L I Friedman; R Y Dodd
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 26.132

View more
  1 in total

1.  Large Fibrinous Coagulum in the Platelet Bag: A Hint Towards Bacterial Contamination.

Authors:  Anubhav Gupta; Kiran Chaudhary; Anupa Pokhrel; Prerna Sachdeva; Shilpi Varshney; Harkiran Arora; Swati Asati
Journal:  Indian J Hematol Blood Transfus       Date:  2020-09-11       Impact factor: 0.900

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.