Literature DB >> 29398334

Visual quality with corneo-scleral contact lenses for keratoconus management.

Juan Carlos Montalt1, Esteban Porcar2, Enrique España-Gregori3, Cristina Peris-Martínez4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess the visual quality achieved by fitting corneo-scleral contact lenses (CScL) for keratoconus management.
METHODS: Thirty patients with keratoconus presented to have CScL fitted because of the unsatisfactory visual quality they experienced with their contact lenses or spectacles. The eye examination included visual acuity assessment, anterior eye biomicroscopy, ocular fundus examination, corneal topographic analysis, endothelial-cell count, contrast sensitivity and aberrometry. The fitting process was performed using a diagnostic trial set. Subjective visual quality and comfort, and contact lens wear time were also reported. Patients were monitored for one year.
RESULTS: Three patients discontinued CScL wear before one year. Therefore, 27 eyes of 27 patients (19 male and 8 female) participated in this study. The mean age was 36.1 ± 13.1 (mean ± SD) years. Statistically significant differences were found in logMAR visual acuity between the best spectacle-corrected vision and after CScL fitting (mean ± SD, 0.23 ± 0.30 and 0.00 ± 0.14, respectively; p < 0.001). The total high-order aberrations decreased significantly (55%), and the spatial frequencies of contrast sensitivity all improved to normal range values of the population. Furthermore, high subjective visual quality and comfort ratings, and prolonged usage times (mean ± SD, 13.44 ± 2.38 h a day) were reported. No adverse ocular effects or clinically relevant changes in corneal parameters, visual quality, comfort or usage time were found one year after wearing CScL.
CONCLUSION: This CScL seems to be safe and healthy, providing optimal visual quality, comfort and prolonged usage times in patients with keratoconus.
Copyright © 2018 British Contact Lens Association. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Corneal ectasia; Corneoscleral contact lens; Keratoconus

Year:  2018        PMID: 29398334     DOI: 10.1016/j.clae.2018.01.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cont Lens Anterior Eye        ISSN: 1367-0484            Impact factor:   3.077


  6 in total

1.  A model of visual limitation in patients with keratoconus.

Authors:  Antonio Pérez-Rueda; Gracia Castro-Luna
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-11-09       Impact factor: 4.379

2.  Effects of Scleral Contact Lenses for Keratoconus Management on Visual Quality and Intraocular Pressure.

Authors:  Martina Formisano; Federica Franzone; Ludovico Alisi; Santino Pistella; Leopoldo Spadea
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2021-01-25       Impact factor: 2.423

Review 3.  How Can We Best Measure the Performance of Scleral Lenses? Current Insights.

Authors:  Rute J Macedo-de-Araújo; Daddi Fadel; Melissa Barnett
Journal:  Clin Optom (Auckl)       Date:  2022-04-07

4.  Effectiveness of More than 2-Year Treatment with Miniscleral Contact Lens in Ocular Surface Diseases: Four Case Reports.

Authors:  Min Sung Oh; Min Seung Kang; Su Hwan Park; Ji Eun Lee
Journal:  Korean J Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-08-05

5.  Characterization and prediction of the clinical result with a specific model of mini-scleral contact lens in corneas with keratoconus.

Authors:  Abdelkader Sidi Mohamed Hamida; García-Barchín Marta; Ruiz-Fortes Pedro; David P Piñero
Journal:  Eye Vis (Lond)       Date:  2022-10-06

6.  Keratoconus and Visual Performance with Different Contact Lenses.

Authors:  Ana Marta; João Heitor Marques; Daniel Almeida; Diana José; Irene Barbosa
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-12-16
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.