Literature DB >> 2939735

Severe cutaneous reactions among American travelers using pyrimethamine-sulfadoxine (Fansidar) for malaria prophylaxis.

K D Miller, H O Lobel, R F Satriale, J N Kuritsky, R Stern, C C Campbell.   

Abstract

In 1982, the fixed combination of pyrimethamine and sulfadoxine (Fansidar) became available in the United States, and was recommended for use in travelers at risk of acquiring chloroquine-resistant Plasmodium falciparum. Prior to that time, no reports of severe cutaneous reactions had appeared in the medical literature despite widespread use for more than 8 years in both Europe and malarious areas of the developing world. In the fall of 1984, the Centers for Disease Control received reports of 4 cases of toxic epidermal necrolysis (including 3 fatalities) among Americans who had used pyrimethamine-sulfadoxine (PYR/SDX) for the prevention of malaria. Subsequent investigation into severe cutaneous reactions associated with the use of this drug by American travelers detected 24 cases of erythema multiforme, Stevens-Johnson syndrome, or toxic epidermal necrolysis. Twenty-three of the 24 patients concurrently used chloroquine. Seven patients died. No risk factors in the development of these reactions other than the use of PYR/SDX could be identified. Among American travelers, we estimate that these reactions occur in 1 per 5,000-8,000 users, and that fatal reactions occur in 1 per 11,000-25,000 users. This higher than expected incidence necessitates that the use of PYR/SDX for the prevention of malaria be reconsidered. In the United States it is now recommended that the routine weekly use of the drug be reserved for those travelers at highest risk of acquiring chloroquine-resistant P. falciparum, when alternate prophylactic regimens are not deemed appropriate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1986        PMID: 2939735     DOI: 10.4269/ajtmh.1986.35.451

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Trop Med Hyg        ISSN: 0002-9637            Impact factor:   2.345


  38 in total

Review 1.  Antiparasitic agent atovaquone.

Authors:  Aaron L Baggish; David R Hill
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Antibiotics for Travelers: What's Good and What's Not.

Authors:  Kathryn N. Suh; Jay S. Keystone
Journal:  Curr Infect Dis Rep       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 3.725

Review 3.  Primary prevention and international travel: infections, immunizations, and antimicrobial prophylaxis.

Authors:  G S Ferenchick; D H Havlichek
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1989 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 4.  Antimalarial pharmacokinetics and treatment regimens.

Authors:  N J White
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 5.  Malaria: prevention in travellers.

Authors:  Ashley M Croft
Journal:  BMJ Clin Evid       Date:  2007-11-29

Review 6.  The safety of antimalarial drugs in pregnancy.

Authors:  P A Phillips-Howard; D Wood
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 7.  Malaria: prevention in travellers.

Authors:  Ashley M Croft
Journal:  BMJ Clin Evid       Date:  2010-07-12

8.  Serious adverse drug reactions to pyrimethamine-sulphadoxine, pyrimethamine-dapsone and to amodiaquine in Britain.

Authors:  P A Phillips-Howard; L J West
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 5.344

9.  Malaria prophylaxis with proguanil and sulfisoxazole in children living in a malaria endemic area.

Authors:  L W Pang; N Limsomwong; P Singharaj; C J Canfield
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 9.408

Review 10.  Adverse effects of antimalarials. An update.

Authors:  G A Luzzi; T E Peto
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 5.606

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.