Literature DB >> 29397291

A Randomized Controlled Trial Examining the Effect of the Addition of the Mandibular Block to Cervical Plexus Block for Carotid Endarterectomy.

Nilgun Kavrut Ozturk1, Ali Sait Kavakli2, Kadir Sagdic3, Kerem Inanoglu2, Raif Umot Ayoglu3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Although the cervical plexus block generally provides adequate analgesia for carotid endarterectomy, pain caused by metal retractors on the inferior surface of the mandible is not prevented by the cervical block. Different pain relief methods can be performed for patients who experience discomfort in these areas. In this study, the authors evaluated the effect of mandibular block in addition to cervical plexus block on pain scores in carotid endarterectomy.
DESIGN: A prospective, randomized, controlled trial.
SETTING: Training and research hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Patients who underwent a carotid endarterectomy.
INTERVENTIONS: Patients scheduled for carotid endarterectomy under cervical plexus block were randomized into 2 groups: group 1 (those who did not receive a mandibular block) and group 2 (those who received a mandibular block). The main purpose of the study was to evaluate the mandibular block in addition to cervical plexus block in terms of intraoperative pain scores.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Intraoperative visual analog scale scores were significantly higher in group 1 (p = 0.001). The amounts of supplemental 1% lidocaine and intraoperative intravenous analgesic used were significantly higher in group 1 (p = 0.001 and p = 0.035, respectively). Patient satisfaction scores were significantly lower in group 1 (p = 0.044). The amount of postoperative analgesic used, time to first analgesic requirement, postoperative visual analog scale scores, and surgeon satisfaction scores were similar in both groups. There was no significant difference between the groups with respect to complications. No major neurologic deficits or perioperative mortality were observed.
CONCLUSIONS: Mandibular block in addition to cervical plexus block provides better intraoperative pain control and greater patient satisfaction than cervical plexus block alone.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Carotid endarterectomy; cervical plexus block; intraoperative VAS scores; mandibular block

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29397291     DOI: 10.1053/j.jvca.2017.06.034

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth        ISSN: 1053-0770            Impact factor:   2.628


  4 in total

Review 1.  Local versus general anaesthesia for carotid endarterectomy.

Authors:  Amaraporn Rerkasem; Saritphat Orrapin; Dominic Pj Howard; Sothida Nantakool; Kittipan Rerkasem
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-10-13

2.  Anastomoses (Superficial Cervical Ansa) Between the Cervical Plexus and Peripheral Facial Nerve Branches: Implications for Regional Anesthesia in Carotid Endarterectomies - Anatomical Study.

Authors:  Ronald Seidel; Andreas Wree; Marko Schulze
Journal:  Local Reg Anesth       Date:  2021-10-13

3.  Cervical plexus block.

Authors:  Jin-Soo Kim; Justin Sangwook Ko; Seunguk Bang; Hyungtae Kim; Sook Young Lee
Journal:  Korean J Anesthesiol       Date:  2018-07-04

4.  Outcomes of Carotid Endarterectomy according to the Anesthetic Method: General versus Regional Anesthesia.

Authors:  Jong Won Kim; Up Huh; Seunghwan Song; Sang Min Sung; Jung Min Hong; Areum Cho
Journal:  Korean J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2019-12-05
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.